Laserfiche WebLink
-3 - <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />• The Chair recessed the meeting at 9:06 P.M. so the Council could be reconvened to <br />act on the above H.R.A. recommendations. When that had been accomplished, the <br />H.R.A. was reconvened at 9:11 P.M. to receive the Council's response in the forms <br />of Resolutions 85-015, 85-016, and 85-017 acceding to the H.R.A. requests. <br />The Attorney then presented for H.R.A. guidance regarding several issues, the <br />proposed Redevelopment Agreement to be finalized with Brighton Development the <br />next day. <br />The H.R.A. members agreed with staff's intention of standing fast on --, <br />n the City's <br />not taking on the responsibility for paying the taxes for 1985_and 1_986, as <br />requested -by the redevelopers: Mr --Krieg agreed with co <br />that. nsensus indicating <br />he perceived to do so would probably affect the increment cash flows for the <br />project. <br />There was also H.R.A. agreement with staff that the $70,000 Letter of Credit would <br />provideadequate_protection without requiring personal guarantees from the <br />Brighton Development shareholders. The Attorney's suggestions for restricting the <br />transfer of ownership was also acceptable. The H.R.A. perceived the soil testing <br />results to be submitted the next day would resolve any hazardous waste questions, <br />one way or another, although, the Executive Director reiterated he would not <br />expect any unforeseen problems to develop in that regard. <br />In spite of the complicated land description for the Walbon property, Mr. Soth <br />indicated he had found no title problems with the redevelopment property and he <br />• confirmed that the triangular shaped parcel on the west side of the property had <br />been satisfactorily handled. <br />The Executive Director indicated the drawings for Schedule A-1 would have to be <br />for 29 units rather than 32 and Mr. Soth gave the following tentative figures for <br />Schedule B-1 and C, which he reminded the H.R.A. would have to correspond to <br />the Springsted cash flow projections: <br />Allocation of Purchase Price <br />Phase I $ 43,200 <br />Phase II 79,200 <br />Phase III 85,600 <br />$208,000 <br />Mr. Soth said the dates on which Brighton Development would purchase the land, tc <br />be inserted on Schedule D, would -6f 30-1985 for the six units of Phase'I; <br />September 30, 1985 for the 11 units of Phase II; and April 30, 1986 for the final <br />12 units in Phase III. The completion dates would have to correspond to the <br />Springsted projections just accepted for Schedule C, according to the Executive <br />Director. <br />The H.R.A. instructed the staff to accede to Brighton Development's request that <br />several items in the deed covenants be deleted as being too specific and since the <br />• City already has control over the type of sidewalks which would be installed. They <br />also concurred with the insertion of "and a statement by the H.R.A. that Brighton <br />Development is in default"•shoul'.d'be sufficient in the second paragraph of the <br />Irrevocable Letter of Credit, Exhibit B. <br />