My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 07282009
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2009
>
CC MINUTES 07282009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:57:55 PM
Creation date
8/24/2016 3:57:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />July 28, 2009 <br />Page 5 <br />Councilmember Stille stated criteria #4 requires that the message changeability be limited to the <br />minimum amount of changes required to accomplish the purpose of the sign, and asked if this <br />was discussed by the Planning Commission. <br />Planning Commissioner Cincoski stated this was not discussed by the Planning Commission. <br />7 City Manager Mornson stated his interpretation of this language is that the sign has to stay on <br />8 long enough for somebody to be able to read it. He added the City Council and Planning <br />9 Commission discussed this in 2004 and determined that eight seconds between messages was <br />10 appropriate; in this case, the School District will have to determine message changeability. <br />11 <br />12 Mayor Faust stated that staff, acting as the zoning administrator, has the ability to enforce this <br />13 provision. <br />14 <br />15 City Manager Morrison stated if staff receives complaints about the sign, staff would work with <br />16 the School District to resolve any issues. He added because this is a Conditional Use Permit, the <br />17 City has the ability to revoke the CUP. <br />18 <br />19 Linn Bjornrud, Wold Architects and Engineers, appeared before the City Council and stated the <br />20 sign will be located between the two existing signs which have since been demolished. He <br />21 indicated there will also be some lighting on the sign so that after the electronic portion is turned <br />22 off, the School District logo will be lit; there will be no light pollution from that because it is a <br />23 short range light on the masonry portion of the sign. He then presented a graphic depiction of <br />24 the sign placement on the property. <br />25 <br />26 Councilmember Stille stated that there were some concerns expressed at the Planning <br />27 Commission meeting about the overall lighting. <br />28 <br />29 Mr. Bjornrud replied that in terms of overall lighting, there are light pollution requirements that <br />30 must be met and their engineers will perform scenarios showing how far certain foot candles will <br />31 reach. <br />32 <br />33 Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Roth, to adopt Resolution 09- <br />34 066, Conditional Use Permit for Placement of an Electronic Sign at 3303 — 33`a Avenue. <br />35 <br />36 Councilmember Thuesen stated there was a note contained in the agenda packet from a resident <br />37 who expressed concerns about the sign. He encouraged residents to attend City Council or <br />38 Planning Commission meetings to voice their concerns in public which allows for further <br />39 discussion, rather than just writing. <br />40 <br />41 Motion carried unanimously. <br />42 <br />43 D. Resolution 09 -067; Conditional Use Permit for Placement of an Electronic Sign at 3600 <br />44 Highcrest Road. <br />45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.