My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 02142006
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2006
>
CC MINUTES 02142006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 10:33:03 AM
Creation date
8/25/2016 10:33:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />February 14, 2006 <br />Page 6 <br />2 Commissioner Stenglein thanked the Council and the task force for their personal time into this <br />3 project. He said the County is doing large things on Lowry Avenue as well. He said potentially <br />4 there will be a new bridge over the river. <br />6 Mr. Twinem stated this Resolution seeks preliminary layout approval from St. Anthony <br />7 Boulevard to 37a' Avenue NE. He noted he met about five times with the task force. The <br />8 preliminary design evolved through the meetings. The task force was comprised of 25 residents. <br />9 The plan we will present is a plan that takes into consideration all of the stakeholder ideas and as <br />10 well as a road that will swerve the community for 50 years. <br />11 <br />12 Mr. Hubmer said a set of values was developed with the task force. There were a number of <br />13 categories that were important to the task force. The biggest priority was sidewalks on both <br />14 sides. Followed by utilities, then lighting along the corridor, and then preserving the Village <br />15 identity and character. The value that received the largest point total by far was sidewalks on <br />16 both sides. This lines up with the Village statement to create a walkable environment. He said <br />17 in one of the first meetings with task force they tried to identify the existing concerns today and <br />18 what will they be in the future. <br />19 <br />20 Mr. Twinem said they gave the task force the assignment to look at other roads with similar <br />21 characteristics to Silver Lake Road. Out of this came design alternatives. Knowing this would <br />22 be a two -lane road, we recognized there would be a need to have shoulders. Shoulders need to <br />23 be 8 feet so it is safe. As the discussion evolved, more of the people living on the roadway, <br />24 chose to go for parking versus an 8 foot shoulder. There are areas at key intersections where we <br />25 have developed bump outs. They have been placed at intersections to shorten the path for people <br />26 to cross the street. This will also prevent passing on the right. He said they have heard <br />27 comments from the open house and on comment cards that some people do not like the impact <br />28 the sidewalk will have. There will be no green space between the curb and sidewalk. There will <br />29 be a space for utility equipment, snow storage, etc. The sidewalks do not create an additional <br />30 footprint in terms of the project. <br />31 <br />32 Mr. Twinem explained as we move down the road from Hilldale to the north fire station <br />33 entrance, we have developed a lot of right turn lanes. The two lane approach at intersections is <br />34 safer. <br />35 <br />36 He went over the project schedule. They will begin the final design in March. A cost sharing <br />37 agreement will be developed in the fall of 2006. Construction will begin in 2007. Some <br />38 easement permissions are needed for this project. There will be retaining walls as part of the <br />39 project to minimize property impact. He noted an initial assessment has been done. He stated <br />40 they will work closely with power companies to try to bury the lines. There may be a small cost <br />41 associated with this. <br />42 <br />43 Mr. Twinem invited questions from the audience. <br />44 <br />45 Elise Woodhall, 3500 Silver Lake Road, said she does not see the need for an extra turn lane <br />46 there. As this project is proposed, she will lose all the trees in her front yard. <br />47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.