My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 06142005
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2005
>
CC MINUTES 06142005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 11:10:35 AM
Creation date
8/25/2016 11:10:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />June 14, 2005 <br />Page 6 <br />1 Mr. Morris explained in 2001, Decision Resources pointed out that one place the city may need <br />2 to be more aggressive is in communication. This challenge has been met, and the city has one of <br />3 the most effective newsletters in the metro area. People are satisfied with the information that is <br />4 getting out there. Residents strongly endorse what the Council has been doing. Silver Lake <br />5 Redevelopment has one of the strongest approval ratings of any redevelopment in the metro area <br />6 in the past five years. <br />7 <br />8 Mayor Faust said this is flattering. He thanked the Staff for touching residents on a daily basis. <br />9 He noted this information will be available in City Hall and on the web site. <br />10 <br />11 VI. TABLED BUSINESS FROM MAY 24, 2005. <br />12 City Manager Mike Morrison read the titles of each of the Resolutions and noted they are all <br />13 interrelated. <br />14 <br />15 A. Consider Resolution 05 -044 re: Adopt Amendment to Developer Agreement with <br />16 Amcon Comoration. <br />17 Mr. Morrison reviewed the resolution with the Council and indicated that the Council did table <br />18 all the zoning and planning issues on May 24. The Council directed staff to negotiate and this <br />19 did occur on May 31. As has been established in previous Council discussions, the current <br />20 development agreement signed July 2003, between the parties obligated the developer to develop <br />21 a 6,000 square foot restaurant on the front pad site to be substantially completed by September 1, <br />22 2004, or totally completed by September 1, 2005. The developer requested a change to the <br />23 existing agreement to allow a mixed -use 4,500 square foot retail building on the pad site and the <br />24 restaurant in the existing building. In the negotiations with the developer on May 31, 2005, staff <br />25 requested the pad site be turned over to the city immediately in return for an amendment to the <br />26 development agreement which would allow the restaurant to not go on the pad site as originally <br />27 planned. The City staff, as an alternative option, requested a payment of $150,000 for an <br />28 amendment to the development agreement. This would allow the developer to construct the <br />29 4,500 square foot building in lieu of 6,000 square feet and move the restaurant to the main <br />30 building. <br />31 <br />32 The developer was proposing a payment to the City in the amount of $100,000 to amend the <br />33 development agreement a week ago, which would allow them to put the 4,500 square foot <br />34 building on the front pad. They did come forward today with a memo agreeing to pay $150,000. <br />35 <br />36 Mr. Morrison noted there is a copy of a petition included in the packet, which is presented by the <br />37 majority of the business owners in St. Anthony Village who feel Amcon should fulfill the <br />38 agreement they originally made and was approved. <br />39 <br />40 Mr. Foster, of Foster & Brever, and a resident, complimented the Council on the results of the <br />41 survey. He took from the survey that overwhelmingly the city residents favor redevelopment. <br />42 That is what he is here to propose. There was less than 10% of the populace of the City that was <br />43 concerned about future growth. That indicates to him that those that would be opposed to <br />44 development in the City are about 10 %. He asked that as he explained his proposal, the Council <br />45 consider that statistic. <br />46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.