My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 06282005
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2005
>
CC MINUTES 06282005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 11:10:56 AM
Creation date
8/25/2016 11:10:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />June 28, 2005 <br />Page 6 <br />2 Motion carried unanimously. <br />3 <br />4 D. Ordinance 2005 -009; Text Amendment; conditional Use Permits Section 1665 04 <br />5 City Attorney Gilligan stated Staff has requested the reviewal of the proposed ordinance text <br />6 amendment that updates the City's Code on its conditional use permit approval process. <br />7 Currently, the City Ordinance requires a 4 /5tbs vote for all requests for a conditional use permit. <br />8 Mr. Gilligan noted that this change is not required by state law. <br />10 Councilmember Stille questioned whether this could jeopardize the City in violating the 60 -day <br />11 rule. Mr. Gilligan answered there are things that can be done and reasons that could be on record <br />12 to supercede this. He noted this would take a lower priority for approval of other things. <br />13 <br />14 Mayor Faust said he thinks the language should not be changed. The state statue made the other <br />15 one necessary to change. He noted this has been the statute for as long as the City was in <br />16 existence. He said he normally doesn't go against legal recommendations, though he believes <br />17 this should not be changed. <br />18 <br />19 Councilmember Stille clarified that this is just trying to be consistent so there isn't one instance <br />20 on the City's Code where a supermajority is required and other instances don't require it. Mr. <br />21 Gilligan said that was correct. <br />22 <br />Councilmember Stille asked whether it could hamper business by keeping it a supermajority, and <br />having a Councilmember gone, for example. Mr. Gilligan said it hasn't been the case. <br />25 <br />26 Councilmember Stille asked if the conditional use permit has to be issued if the findings are <br />27 there. Mr. Gilligan answered affirmatively. <br />28 <br />29 Councilmember Thuesen clarified that is the 4 /5ths vote was kept, it does not put the City in any <br />30 legal danger. Mr. Gilligan said it does not. The provision in the City Code does not violate state <br />31 law. <br />32 <br />33 Councilmember Horst stated he doesn't disagree with a supermajority. There are other instances <br />34 in the Statute that need supermajority. He said he would like to feel that the Council was fully in <br />35 favor of a conditional use and said that 4 /5ths would not be a problem. He said he was inclined <br />36 to leave the text the way it is. <br />37 <br />38 Councilmember Thuesen agreed and said he is inclined to leave it the way it is. He said it sends <br />39 a clear message when you have a supermajority. When it comes to a 3/2 vote, it becomes gray <br />40 area. He said the Ordinance has served the City well, and he would like to see it remain as is. <br />41 <br />42 Councilmember Stille said he agreed with Mayor Faust in that in the future two Councilmembers <br />43 could vote to deny a conditional use permit, and that is something they would like to avoid. <br />44 <br />Councilmember Horst stated that in a 4 /5ths vote, it is opened up to have someone block it. He <br />said on items that relate to all the community, like a conditional use permit, he would like to see <br />47 a strong vote. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.