CC PACKET 10112016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Plaintiffs also argue that they were entitled to attempt to purchase the Park under subdivision 7, after their attempt under subdivision 6 was rejected. This requires the Court to interpret the effect of subdivisions 6 and 7. Defendants argue that Plaintiffs were entitled to the right of first refusal under either subdivision 6 or 7, but not both, depending on when the Park’s use was intended to change. Plaintiffs argue that they had the right of first refusal prior to the sale and again after the sale. This court does not find Plaintiffs’ position persuasive. “A statute should be interpreted, whenever possible, to give effect to all of its provisions; ‘no word, phrase, or sentence should be deemed superfluous, void, or insignificant.’” Schroedl, 616 N.W.2d at 277 (quoting Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hosp., 598 N.W.2d 379, 384 (Minn.1999)). The Court is “to read and construe a statute as a whole and must interpret each section in light of the surrounding sections to avoid conflicting interpretations.” Id. The question before the court is: how does one read and reconcile the language of subdivisions 6, 7, and 9? The wording of subdivision 6 states that it applies “before the execution of an agreement to purchase a manufactured home park . . . if the purchaser intends to close the manufactured home park or convert it to another use within one year of the execution of the agreement.” Minn. Stat. § 327C.095, subd. 6 (emphasis added). The wording in subdivision 7 states that it applies “[i]f the purchaser of a manufactured home park decides to convert the park to another use within one year after the purchase of the park.” Id. at subd. 7 (emphasis added). Subdivision 9 indicates that the right to purchase the park closes, despite non compliances “[i]f the manufactured home is finally sold or converted to another use.” Id. at subd. 9 (emphasis added). Reading the plain language of these statutes together, the statutory framework devised by the legislature is clear. The manufactured homeowners’ right to purchase the Park is contingent upon when the decision to close or convert the Park is made. Subdivision 6 provides the right of 39