My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WORKSESSION 06022005
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
2005
>
CC WORKSESSION 06022005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2016 3:26:36 PM
Creation date
11/14/2016 3:26:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
contract or joint powers agreement that restricted them from breaking away and what concessions <br />did they have to do in order to remove any responsibilities or liabilities to the commission. Mr. <br />Mayer indicated that while they do not belong to a cable commission, their franchise agreement <br />with Time - Warner at the time did not preclude the City from becoming a Wireless Internet Service <br />Provider (WISP). Currently, though, there appears to be many telecommunications companies <br />who do want legislative action to limit or restrict a local government's ability to become a WISP <br />(This statement based on comments heard at the FiberFirst Minnesota FTTH Conference, March 30, <br />2005). Arizona and Texas are two states that are currently trying to pass legislation to preclude <br />cities from being able to become WISP'S. Texas wants to go further by taking away a city's <br />authority to negotiate and become a party to franchise agreements with cable or <br />telecommunications companies. It is apparently their desire for the state to be the only <br />governmental agency to negotiate franchise agreements. <br />Revenues and Expenses. Another important aspect of this project was the City's contribution to <br />the investment costs of installing the wireless technology. The City Council understood the <br />importance of providing this service to the community for its continued viability and accepted the <br />responsibility to provide accessible Internet when the private sector provider would not. Mr. <br />Mayer indicated that the City's share of the capital costs were approximately $800,000 and were <br />related to providing high -speed Internet service to about 18,000 residents. <br />The City of Chaska had an agreement already in place with the school district that gave the City <br />access to much of the fiber optic cable that is used as the backbone to the network. This fiber optic <br />system had, in addition to servicing the school, provided limited Internet service to the business <br />community. Some of the City's money was also used to add a residential component to this <br />already existing base of business customers. Also incorporated into the wireless plan, was an <br />Internet system that the City had previously installed but was limited in its serviceability to the <br />community. As a result, the City had much of the routing equipment needed, some servers and in- <br />house knowledge of wireless gained from their past experience with a "fixed" wireless Internet <br />system. <br />Mr. Mayer indicated that at the end of the installation of the TROPOS Network system, there <br />remained a small portion of Chaska that is not serviced and these areas are made up of existing <br />large farms. He felt, though, that eventually, service will be run to these areas as the system grows <br />or the properties are developed. <br />Mr. Mayer also wanted to make the point that the City did not and does not now consider this <br />service as a revenue enhancement for the City; they are simply providing a community desired <br />service that their private sector provider, Time - Warner, has refused to provide because it wasn't <br />cost effective and affected profitability too much. Once the equipment certificates that they used <br />to fund the project are paid, the monthly fees of $15.99 will be used to maintain and upgrade the <br />wireless system. <br />In Conclusion. A summary of Chaska's experience has been compiled by TROPOS Networks and <br />is included with this staff report for your review. It describes the history of this project, what was <br />required technically and financially to get this project off the ground and the level of maintenance <br />to keep the system running. In addition to acquiring additional equipment, the City also owns <br />some of the needed infrastructure, including their utility poles. Obviously, the more of the basic <br />infrastructure that a City owns to support a wireless Internet network, the less capital investment <br />is required. In reviewing the information on the Tropos MetroMesh System, it states that cost is <br />dependent on several variables: The city's topography, denseness of foliage of the trees, <br />availability of mounting locations, interference sources and the level of system management <br />H:Wlemos \2005 \Wire1ess Internet 05032005.doc rev. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.