Laserfiche WebLink
City of St. Anth <br />Senior Cooperativ <br />Pros <br />Cons <br />Don't approve amended concept and developer will default <br />Work with developer to continue partnership. To date, <br />since they can't obtain financing to construct condominiums <br />developer has worked hard to ensure the redevelopment <br />due to the current state of the market. Land will remain <br />that was envisioned by the Council was implemented. <br />vacant and undeveloped for next several years since no <br />other developer is likely to step in and construct <br />condominiums due to market conditions. <br />Senior Cooperative units were envisioned in the Intial plan <br />as part of Phase IL Since this portion of the land in Phase <br />City doesn't have as many condominiums as originally <br />II will not be purchased, the City has the opporutnity to still <br />planned. <br />provide this housing as originally envisioned. <br />Still an owner occupied solution (most cities are looking at <br />having to convert projects to rental or developer is walking <br />away from development) <br />Less units than originally projected (100+ vs 128) and <br />Finalize Phase I development and bring on 100+ units to <br />assist in strengthening commercial development (more <br />possibly lower property valuation. <br />retail users). <br />Get development of all units sooner (previous plan only <br />had 64 units starting in 2008 and the remainder in 2009) <br />Provide another housing option in the City (don't have <br />Valuation may not be as high ($30.7M vs $22.5M or $8.2M <br />concentration of all condos) to provide more stability and <br />less) which equates to less tax base over time (based upon <br />flexibility with changing markets over time (this type of <br />original estimated value of $240,000 /unit for condos and <br />housing was outlined for development in phase II). <br />now only $225,000 /unit for Cooperative units). <br />Can require remaining special assessments for 39th <br />Assessments don't have to be paid until Certificate of <br />Avenue construction be paid at time of approval of <br />Occupancy (CO) is received for 1st occupant per each <br />contract ($162,500). <br />building (not paid tii 2009 and later) <br />Can negotiate other changes in contract in favor of City. <br />Wouldn't need to renegotiate contract. <br />Continue to provide senior housing product that allows <br />current residents to move out of their homes into this <br />Condos provided the same opportunity. <br />housing product, thus opening up opportunities for families <br />to move in. <br />Owner of this type of unit is limited to level of return on <br />investment when "selling" unit (2 1/2% of what you put <br />down and simple interest), but keeps product "affordable" <br />In condominiums, the owner gets upside equal to where <br />to seniors. Also, seniors have help with resale due to <br />market is at, at the time of sale (possiblity of more "upside" <br />waiting list from demand for product type and don't have to <br />dollar wise). <br />pay realtors fees or any closing costs (just buying shares, <br />like stock certificate). <br />Product is something the market desires (cooperatives are <br />Need to have 60% of units presold before construction can <br />still selling in the metro area and unlike most condominium <br />start. <br />developments). <br />With HUD financing, individuals don't have to go out and <br />Required to put 30% down on unit, whereas in other <br />secure separate mortgage financing in a challenging <br />ownership amount of downpayment may not be dictated or <br />market or inability to secure mortgage due to to being <br />this high. <br />retired. <br />