Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />October 11, 2016 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />find anyone that would move his mobile home. He was approached to stay in Lowry Grove, built 1 <br />a workshop and a porch, and his mobile home is paid for. Mr. Storic stated if he has to move he 2 <br />will lose over $12,000 for the buildings he has built. 3 <br /> 4 <br />A Lowry Grove resident stated she has lived in Lowry Grove for three years. She has a 10-year-5 <br />old daughter. She asked Council for their help so Lowry Grove does not close and she can 6 <br />remain in her home as she does not have the resources to live elsewhere. She noted that many 7 <br />seniors live in Lowry Grove and asked Council to think of the families. She stated she takes the 8 <br />bus to work, the school is close for her daughter, and asked Council to please not close the Park. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Ms. Lordes Hernandez stated she moved to Lowry Grove last year and they worked hard to get 11 <br />the $6 million to buy the Park. They have knocked on doors and asked neighbors for help to save 12 <br />the land. She stated her son is happy at school now, is getting a good education, good grades, and 13 <br />has friends. Ms. Hernandez stated she does not drive, she rides the bus. She asked if they have 14 <br />the money, why can’t the residents buy the land and stated she hopes the Council can help. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Mr. Cann stated the administrator of the MH Trust Fund has no knowledge of the agreement 17 <br />referred to by the City Attorney. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Ms. Traci Tomas stated the point was made that Lowry Grove is a cheap place to live but the 20 <br />increased real estate taxes would not be possible without raising the rent substantially for the 21 <br />residents. Ms. Tomas stated concerns were raised about demolishing the homes in the Park. She 22 <br />reviewed the process for removal, noting most of the homes contained asbestos. Residents were 23 <br />encouraged to remove whatever they wished from the mobile home prior to it being demolished. 24 <br />The rental agreement includes that 9 month’s written notice is required prior to the Park being 25 <br />sold. Ms. Tomas stated false hopes limited communication with the residents. Valuations on the 26 <br />homes that were moved were based on NADA guides and with negotiation with the residents. 27 <br />She stated no other renters receive this type of compensation. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Mayor Faust asked about the RVs. Ms. Thomas stated the police reports were received on the 30 <br />incidents with the RVs and management was told to evict them immediately. There is no notice 31 <br />for eviction for illegal activity. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Mayor Faust closed the public hearing at 8:55 p.m. 34 <br /> 35 <br />City Attorney Steger reviewed the legal right of first refusal. The Statute provides for a 45-day 36 <br />right of first refusal before the Park is closed. There is not a second right of first refusal 37 <br />following the sale of the Park. He advised the City does not have the right to prevent the closure. 38 <br />The City does not own the Park. The City does not have the authority to prevent the Park from 39 <br />closing. He advised the District Court dismissed the claim and if the sale violated the Statute, the 40 <br />Court does not have authority to invalidate the sale. The only recourse for the residents was to 41 <br />sue for damages. This was the big change. 42 <br /> 43 <br />City Attorney Steger stated the only thing that could prevent the closing of the Park was a Court 44 <br />Order. No such order has been received by the City Council. He stated HUD could request a 45 <br />restraining order from the Attorney General. If the hearing closes tonight, after the 60-day period 46 <br />the owner could begin forcing the relocation of the residents. The City Attorney Steger noted the 47 <br />Attorney General is already involved in the State litigation and would take the request seriously 48 <br />8