My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 10252016
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2016
>
CC PACKET 10252016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2016 1:10:59 PM
Creation date
12/29/2016 1:09:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />October 11, 2016 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Mayor Faust opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m. 2 <br /> 3 <br />1. Review Closure Statement 4 <br /> 5 <br />Mayor Faust stated Section 111.092 of the St. Anthony City Code requires that the City “hold” a 6 <br />public hearing within 90 days of receiving a closure statement. Subdivision 3 of the Park Closure 7 <br />Statute also requires the Council hold a public hearing upon receipt of a closure statement in 8 <br />order to initiate a process for compensating home owners displaced by the closure for the cost of 9 <br />relocating their homes. Subdivision 4 requires the public hearing accomplish the following tasks: 10 <br />• Review the closure statement; 11 <br />• Review the impact of closure on home owners and the Park owner; 12 <br />• Inform affected home owners of their potential eligibility for compensation from 13 <br />the Minnesota Manufactured Home Relocation Trust Fund; and, 14 <br />• Appointment of a neutral third party to make compensation recommendations and 15 <br />apply for relocation payments from the Fund on the residents’ behalf. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Mayor Faust reviewed since September 8, there have been three significant developments that 18 <br />have clarified the Park closure and home owner and Trust Fund compensation issues raised by 19 <br />the lawsuit. 20 <br /> 21 <br />First, the Hennepin County Court issued an order decisively ruling that the sale of the Park, and 22 <br />The Village’s ownership of it, will not be disturbed, even if the Court ultimately decides the sale 23 <br />of the Park violated the statute. Thus, the Hennepin County Court has unambiguously declared it 24 <br />will not prevent the Park from closing. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Second, the City Council has received a letter from The Village stating unequivocally that it will 27 <br />close the Park in March 2017 and that it wants to help with relocation as soon as possible so that 28 <br />residents are not forced to try to relocate during the dead of winter. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Third, the City Council has received The Village’s signed, written agreement 1) to reimburse the 31 <br />Trust Fund for all relocation payments made from the Fund in connection with relocations 32 <br />caused by the closure of the Park; and, 2) not to interfere or oppose in any way with 33 <br />compensation paid to home owners and residents from the Fund for any reason, including any 34 <br />future decision that may be issued in the lawsuit. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Mayor Faust stated on October 10, the City received a letter from the Department of Housing 37 <br />and Urban Development (HUD) stating they have a pending fair housing complaint for Lowry 38 <br />Grove residents and HUD plans to start an investigation. The developer has been requested to 39 <br />take no further action while HUD investigates. Mayor Faust noted the HUD action is directed 40 <br />towards the residents and the developer and not toward the City. HUD has not, to the City’s 41 <br />knowledge, obtained a restraining order against the developer. It is not clear how long the HUD 42 <br />process will take or what the outcome will be. The City’s role is to ensure there is a fair market 43 <br />evaluation process and to appoint a third neutral party to help make fair valuations decisions. 44 <br /> 45 <br />City Attorney Phil Steger stated he spoke with the author of the HUD letter, John Mead, to make 46 <br />sure he understood the role of the City. A complaint was filed, but was incomplete and did not 47 <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.