Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />February 14, 2017 <br />Page 5 <br />I associated with carbon filtration of potable water became a water fund expense. These costs had <br />2 previously been excluded from the calculation of water rates. Funds provided as part of the <br />3 closing of the Water Filtration Fund allows for a phase -in of these costs into the water rates. The <br />4 Water Fund expenditures have been categorized by two primary operating functions. These <br />5 functions are the production of potable water and the distribution of the potable water. Beyond <br />6 the carbon filtration costs previously carried in the Water Filtration Fund, the Water Fund carried <br />7 the treatment costs associated with iron removal and ground water pumping. These costs <br />8 combined with carbon filtration costs and estimated advanced oxidation process costs equal the <br />9 production costs. The labor costs associated with the maintenance of the distribution system, <br />10 water billing and administrative support, along with other distribution operating costs equal <br />11 distribution costs. <br />12 <br />13 Ms. Rueckert stated the current recommendation is to modify the water rate structure as follows: <br />14 eliminate the use of a Minimum charge; phase -in a quarterly fee for distribution system costs — <br />15 over time; and, usage rate growth decelerates as flat fee is phased -in. Rate structure <br />16 modifications provide: elimination of the minimum charge will extend an incentive for water <br />17 conservation to quarterly usage levels less than 7,500 gallons; aligning revenue sources with <br />18 corresponding costs; the Distribution system charge will be based on distribution costs and <br />19 applied by residential equivalent units; providing greater transparency as to the basis of rates and <br />20 rate adjustments; and, increases ability to maintain a structural balanced operation as revenue <br />21 generated would not be entirely subjected to volatility in water usage (dry vs. wet summers). <br />22 <br />23 Ms. Rueckert stated the current recommendation is to modify the sewer rate structure as follows: <br />24 eliminate the use of a Minimum charge; phase -in a quarterly fee for collection system costs — <br />25 over time; and, usage rate growth decelerates as flat fee is phased -in. Rate structure <br />26 modifications provide: aligning revenue sources with corresponding costs; the collection system <br />27 charge will be based on collection costs and applied by residential equivalent units; and, provide <br />28 greater transparency as to the basis of rates and rate adjustments. Ms. Rueckert reviewed the <br />29 multi -year approach to storm water rates planned for the quarterly single family residential <br />30 charge to increase by thirty -five cents. In 2017, this represents a 2.37% increase in rates and the <br />31 2.37% rate increase will be applied to all levels of storm water charges. <br />32 The sewer rates, water rates and storm water rates were provided by tiers. <br />33 <br />34 Councilmember Gray commented a goal has been for water conservation. Ms. Rueckert stated <br />35 over the last few years the cash flow has been breakeven. <br />36 <br />37 Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Brever, to approve First Reading <br />38 of Ordinance 2017 -01; an Ordinance Setting Sewer, Water and Storm Water Charges for 2017. <br />39 <br />40 Motion carried 5 -0. <br />41 <br />42 C. Ordinance 2017 -02: an Ordinance adding Chapter 132 Predatory Offenders to the Cif <br />43 Code. <br />44 <br />45 Mayor Faust reviewed from a report written by Phil Steger, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, that in <br />46 2006, some local governments in Minnesota began to adopt ordinances restricting where <br />