My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 08282017
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2017
>
PL PACKET 08282017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2017 8:06:25 AM
Creation date
8/29/2017 7:56:51 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
282
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To Whom it May Concern- <br />Please take into consideration the following message and pass along to the members of the St. Anthony City <br />Planning Commission. <br />My name is Alex Walker. I'm a homeowner in the Stinson Triangle, the area of Northeast Minneapolis east of <br />Stinson and south of Lowry. I know there has been a lot of attention paid to the redevelopment likely to occur <br />in this area, and I would like to comment on a couple of issues pertaining to it. <br />I'm concerned about the traffic impact the proposed Lowry Grove development will produce. From my understanding, the traffic study that <br />your commission approved didn't account for the intersection of Stinson Parkway and 18th Ave. NE. As you may know, this intersection <br />already causes a number of problems when heading south on Stinson and backing up the parkway, and causes significantly more issues when <br />cars turn left from New Brighton Blvd. onto the parkway, only to suddenly stop due to the number of cars needing to turn left on 18th. I'm <br />concerned that adding thousands of trips a day will result in that changing from a problem intersection to a dangerous one. In addition to the <br />cars that get jammed up there, there are many pedestrians and bicyclists who cross that intersection, and I'm worried about increased danger <br />for them as well. <br />In addition, I have children -- as do my neighbors -- who cross Stinson at 23rd twice a day every day to get to their school bus drop off/pick <br />up point. While the Parkway is an ideal location for them to cross at this point, more traffic will only make that more dangerous for them. <br />It has also recently been brought to our neighborhood's attention that the St. Anthony city planner has proposed <br />to the city's Land Use Steering Committee that they change the zoning of the area south of Kenzie Terrace and <br />north of Lowry (Catrina's, the Chinese Day Care, and the five homes behind the Legacy senior housing <br />complex) to high density residential. <br />I understand this is just a proposal for your Comprehensive Plan and not a specific plan of action, however I am <br />vehemently opposed to this idea. I see no way in which this will not increase traffic in the Stinson <br />Triangle. Our neighborhood is full of kids who ride and run through the streets. We live here because it's quiet <br />and quaint, much as it is in St. Anthony. I'm sure that with the traffic that will already increase on Stinson due <br />to the Lowry Grove redevelopment people will come through the Triangle as a proposed development on the <br />south side of Kenzie Terrace will likely need to provide access within the Triangle. <br />Again, I understand that this is a proposal at this point, but I want you to understand that this type of <br />development would completely change the dynamic of the Triangle and I'm sure would force many of our <br />residents to consider relocating. I need you to understand the incredibly deleterious effect this would have on <br />your neighbors and ask that you consider that in your decision-making process. <br />I accept that new development is likely to occur at Lowry Grove, and I'm not necessarily opposed to it. However, I want it to be done <br />thoughtfully and with concern for the thousands of residents who use that area already for driving, biking, walking, running, and playing. I <br />don't want to see density for density's sake. I want to see it done in an intelligent way which adds to the established community and increases <br />the tax base of your city without disrupting the lives of the current residents in too great a way. <br />I ask that you consider your neighbors and the effect it would have on us BEFORE considering the revenue implications it would have for <br />your city. Many of us understand the opportunity you have been presented and your desire to pursue it to it's greatest effect. However, our <br />cities seem to have a strong relationship at this point, and moving forward in a careless, aggressive manner would cause serious harm to the <br />relationship with your Northeast neighbors. While we don't have voting power to remove the people who have appointed you to your <br />1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.