Laserfiche WebLink
<br />•The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character <br />of the locality; <br />–Criterion met <br />•Economic considerations alone are not the basis of practical <br />difficulties; <br />–Criterion not met <br />•The variance, if granted, would be consistent with the City’s <br />comprehensive land use plan; <br />–Criterion not met <br />• The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general <br />purposes and intent of the zoning code; <br />–Criterion not met <br /> <br />Variance Criteria Review <br />•Recommendation <br /> <br />–The Applicant’s request for a variance from the rear yard <br />setback to allow for the construction of the deck addition is not <br />reasonable, per the findings listed in city code. <br /> <br />–Staff recommends denial of the variance to encroach into the <br />rear yard setback. <br /> <br />–Planning Commission met on September 25, 2017, held a <br />public hearing, and recommended denial of the variance, <br />unanimously. <br />3113 Edward St. NE