Laserfiche WebLink
8 <br /> <br />Audit <br /> <br />Law enforcement agencies are required to conduct an independent biennial audit of portable recording <br />system data. The results are public, unless otherwise classified under the Minnesota Government Data <br />Practices Act (MGDPA). In cities, the city council determines whether the law enforcement agency is <br />complying with the law. If not, the city council can order additional independent audits. A summary <br />report must be provided to the Legislative Committee on Data Practices and Personal Data Privacy <br />within 60 days following completion of the audit. If the city council finds that there is a pattern of <br />substantial noncompliance, it must suspend the use of portable recording systems until the city council <br />reinstates their use. Suspension can only happen after providing the law enforcement agency and the <br />public a reasonable opportunity to respond to the audit findings in a public meeting. State statute does <br />not specify what makes the audit “independent.” This is a similar auditing requirement that is in the <br />automated license plate reader (ALPR) statute, so we could rely on their ALPR auditing practices. For <br />further guidance, we will consult with our city attorney. <br /> <br />Tri-City Body Cam Workgroup <br /> <br />A Tri-City Body Camera Workgroup was convened to review current police policies and protocols, best <br />practices and trends, and policy development in order to present recommendations to the Chief of <br />Police for the drafting of a BWC policy. The group was made up of appointed residents and City Council <br />liaisons from St. Anthony, Falcon Heights, and Lauderdale. The group met on a monthly basis from <br />January through April, during which a BWC draft policy was reviewed and considered. The meetings <br />were facilitated by Burnsville Police Chief Eric Gieseke, who was able to provide his vast base of <br />knowledge and experience, as his police department was one of the first police agencies to bring BWC <br />technology to Minnesota back in 2010. <br /> <br />The group received information presented by outside subject matter experts: <br />• Current MN State Statutes regarding BWCs (Chief Gieseke/Chief Mangseth) <br />• BWC demonstration (Chief Gieseke and Burnsville PD staff) <br />• MN Data Practices and how MN State Statute deals with information recorded by portable video <br />recording devices (Don Gemberling – MN Data Practices Author) <br />• How outside agencies assist in investigating police critical incidents, including policy <br />considerations reference BWCs (Jeff Hanson – Deputy Superintendent of Investigations, MN BCA) <br />• Technology considerations concerning BWCs, data storage, and redaction (Burnsville PD staff) <br />• IT and back end client considerations pertaining to operating hardware, software, media/data <br />storage and technical support (Terre Heiser – IT Manager, City of Roseville/Metro I-Net. <br /> <br />The draft policy was presented to the League of MN Cities legal division, by the St. Anthony Police Chief, <br />for review by a League Attorney, assigned by the League of MN Cities. No changes were recommended. <br /> <br />Funding <br /> <br />In February, 2017, the St. Anthony Police Department applied for funding under the U.S. Department of <br />Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance Body-Worn Camera Policy and <br />Implementation Program. The grant holds a matched funding requirement to assist in purchasing <br />equipment, policy development, training, and other needs related to implementing a BWC program. We <br />were recently notified that we will be awarded funding under this DOJ grant. We will be working <br />through the process of accepting this grant and remain encouraged to begin the implementation <br />process. <br /> <br />26