My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 10242017
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2017
>
CC PACKET 10242017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2017 9:02:51 AM
Creation date
10/19/2017 10:06:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />October 10, 2017 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Ms. Thomas stated to deny a proposal due to density is wrong. The City is relying on the 2008 1 <br />Comprehensive Plan as the guiding source. That Plan does not address current factors. There are 2 <br />existing issues that need to be resolved and less density creates an unfeasible development. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Mr. Jared Ward, Civil Engineer, reviewed the site challenges. He stated there are a number of 5 <br />things to consider for the site such as traffic, grading challenges, storm water treatment 6 <br />restrictions, building and garage entrances, building setbacks, walkability and connectivity of the 7 <br />site, and fire requirements. Mr. Ward stated the revised proposal addresses these concerns. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Mr. Christopher Pelpovich, BKV Architect, reviewed the overall design of the project and 10 <br />pointed out some of the major elements. He reviewed the buildings and their heights and 11 <br />reviewed the pieces that have changed including Building C, exterior of townhomes, Building A, 12 <br />Buildings B and E, Building D. Mr. Pelpovich stated the current plan shows 712 units with 867 13 <br />enclosed parking stalls and 237 additional surface stalls with 100 being parallel parking along the 14 <br />streets. Mr. Pelpovich reviewed the stages of the project and indicated the entire site would be 15 <br />completed in 2022. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Mr. Brady Halvorson reviewed the overall concept of the site and landscape plan. There will be 18 <br />sidewalks on both sides of the streets with lighting and boulevard trees. They wanted to make 19 <br />this a comfortable inviting neighborhood that is consistent with the neighboring properties. Good 20 <br />neighborhood and community design principles have been implemented. He reviewed the 21 <br />outside space available to all residents, noting there would be room for 38 additional parking 22 <br />spaces if some of the green space was given up. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Mr. Pelpovich returned to the podium and reviewed the outside of Building B and the number of 25 <br />units within the building and parking. He also reviewed Building D, which would be the largest 26 <br />building on the site, and the townhomes plan. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Ms. Mindy Michaels, Sr. Project Manager, provided insight into the design for the senior 29 <br />components included in senior services building and the senior co-op building. She reviewed the 30 <br />services available in the senior services building. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Ms. Traci Thomas returned to the podium and quoted from the Comprehensive Plan regarding 33 <br />Lowry Grove development. She then reviewed the settlement. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Mr. Christopher Pelpovich reviewed Building E and stated one of the challenges is the ground 36 <br />water contamination that is occurring. The same applies to Building B. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Mr. Alan Arthur, President and CEO of AEON, stated he is frustrated and confused with the 39 <br />recommendation from the City Manager to deny the strong and compelling proposal by The 40 <br />Village. He feels they have appropriately responded to most of the comments and concerns with 41 <br />the previous proposal. He is discouraged the 97 homes from the Lowry Grove Mobile Home 42 <br />Park might not be replaced. He does not see how 41.4 units per acre compared to the 43 <br />Comprehensive Plan of 40 units per acre is a deal breaker. If that is the case, AEON would only 44 <br />do 75-80 affordable apartment homes to keep the density at 40 units/acre. He stated he is sad the 45 <br />City would turn down the revised proposal. 46 <br />5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.