Laserfiche WebLink
A <br />WSB <br />- <br />& A. odw., Inc. <br />Infrastructure • Engineering . Planning a Construction <br />9 9 9 <br />701 Xenia Avenue South <br />Sui[e 300 <br />Minneapolis, MN 55416 <br />Tel: 763 - 641 -4600 <br />Fax: 763- 541.1700 <br />CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE MEMORANDUM <br />To: <br />St. Anthony Village Planning Commission <br />From: <br />Jacqueline Corkle, PTP, AICP Interim City Planner <br />Date: June 11, 2012 <br />Planning Commission Regular Meeting for June 19, 2012 <br />City Council Regular Meeting for June 26, 2012 <br />WSB Project No. 01626 -630 <br />Request: Request for a Variance to Exceed the Amount of Lot Coverage <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The Applicant's request for a variance to exceed the maximum amount of impervious surface is <br />reasonable and consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Based on our review, staff recommends <br />approval of the requested variance to exceed the maximum amount of impervious surface for the property <br />located at 33013 1 st Avenue subject to the conditions as outlined in Exhibit D. <br />GENERAL INFORMATION <br />Applicant: Curt and Jane Wollan <br />Owner: Same as above <br />Location: 33013 Ist Avenue NE <br />Existing Land Use / Low Density Residential/zoned: Rl; Single Family <br />Zoning: <br />Surrounding Land North: Low Density Residential; zoned Rl; Single Family <br />Use / Zoning: East: Low Density Residential; zoned Rl; Single Family <br />South: Low Density Residential; zoned Rl; Single Family <br />West: Low Density Residential; zoned Rl; Single Family <br />Deadline for Agency Application Date: 05 -4 -12 <br />Action: 60 Days: 07 -2 -12 <br />Letter Sent: N/A <br />120 Days: 08 -30 -12 <br />CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE PROPOSED VARIANCE <br />1. Background <br />The property owners are interested in adding steps to the front of their house and constructing a <br />sidewalk and patio from the driveway to the front steps. The property currently does not have <br />permanent steps to the front door area. The property owner had submitted a building permit for staff <br />approval of the proposed improvement. Staff reviewed the proposed improvement and recognized <br />that the subject property already exceeded the impervious surface limits for the R -1 district and that <br />the proposed improvement would exacerbate the situation. <br />