Laserfiche WebLink
Language for Discussion <br />Staff offers the above suggested language for review and discussion by the City Council. Some, all, none, <br />or a modification of the above language could be incorporated into the City's existing Ordinance relating <br />to driveways. The additions to the Code attempt to address some of the concerns of staff regarding the <br />existing language. These concerns are centered on driveway widths and setbacks from adjacent property. <br />As the Code is currently written, there is no limit to the width of a driveway. Driveway sizes in general <br />are limited by the impervious surface requirement. However, a property that is well below the impervious <br />limit could potentially pave the entire front width of their property or portion thereof. While curb cuts are <br />limited to 28 feet in width, this does not prevent a property owner from paving along the front curb and <br />using this space for parking. Staff believes that this scenario would detract from the appearance of <br />existing neighborhoods. <br />In addition, the current language in the Code states that curb cuts simply be 30 feet apart, not a specific <br />distance from a lot line. Therefore one property owner could potentially locate their curb cut along the <br />edge of their property, forcing adjacent property owners to construct any future curb cut at least 30 feet <br />away. Therefore, where one property owner chooses to locate their curb cut has a direct impact on where <br />a neighboring property owner can locate theirs, which is not practical or reasonable. Staff also believes it <br />is important to have a driveway setback requirement in order to allow for proper snow removal /storage <br />and stormwater management/drainage adjacent to a driveway. As it is written currently, the Code allows <br />property owners to pave right up to their side lot lines. The proposed changes to the Code are common <br />requirements found among other similar cities. <br />