PL PACKET 03262018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes February 26, 2018 Page 15 more because of the storm drain. The setback on Stinson would need to be reduced. He noted 1 there is a considerable amount of environmental issues on the site and a traditional rain garden 2 would not be possible because both ponds need to be lined. The sidewalks in the right of way 3 are subject to Hennepin County and Park Board approval. The width of 6 feet would pertain to 4 the interior trails and the developer will work with the Park Board on the access. In addition, 5 they would be open to speed bumps. He stated the project rents are not currently available and a 6 range would be provided to Council for review. 7 8 Ms. Rothstein asked if private security is in the plan. Mr. Wilson stated there is 24-hour staff on 9 hand in the assisted living building. Private security can be discussed with staff prior to review 10 by the City Council. 11 12 Chair Papatola closed the public hearing at 9:03 p.m. 13 14 Commissioner Kalar had some questions on traffic. He would support the consideration of the 15 intersection being further analyzed. He believes this is less a capacity issue and more of a 16 behavior issue. He asked about the proof of parking, stated he wants to make sure the parking 17 decision is based on sound practices and he does not want to over park it. He does not want to 18 see a lot of parking open and asked if the proof of parking could be expanded. He stated he lives 19 adjacent to the property. Mr. Wilson referred to the drawing of the parking and stated they would 20 be open to any amendments expanding the proof of parking. 21 22 Commissioner Bartel asked if there is a baseline that should be considered as the percentage of 23 affordable housing. Ms. Rothstein stated there is no policy that claims a specific level. The Met 24 Council and HUD had levels, 80% AMI is more affordable than market level. She felt the rents 25 are still very high for those units, noting a family size of 4 is generally the standard. She stated 26 this is a policy question as to what the City wants to achieve. Commissioner Bartel confirmed the 27 Planning Commission has nothing to do with the TIF decision. 28 29 Commissioner Socha asked about moving the assisted living 17 feet as the Kenzington had 30 concerns, noting if it was moved the patio would still be protected. 31 32 Commissioner Larson stated it seems the school district has lost quite a few students from the 33 closing of Lowry Grove. The new development has 12 units of 3-bedroom apartments and he is 34 concerned about the provision for housing for families. He stated it is important to provide 35 housing for all demographics as best we can. He feels the prior proposal had several flaws 36 related to density and he finds the current proposal is more appealing. Commissioner Larson 37 asked if affordable housing is not required in this development, can it be required anywhere. He 38 stated it is important to support people in all levels of life and economic situations. He would like 39 to see more affordable housing and asked what the affordable housing component will be in the 40 Comprehensive Plan and if it can they be applied now. Ms. Rothstein stated affordable housing 41 can be controlled through zoning densities, regulation, and/or financial tools. The draft comp 42 plan will have affordable housing policy discussed. She noted there are tools the City can use to 43 subsidize affordable housing. These need to be policy discussions outside of the project review. 44 Commissioner Larson stated he would like to see the code revised so it is applicable for the next 45 project. 46