Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br />August 27, 2018 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />unidentified in the audience noted the sign automatically dims in the evening in response to a 1 <br />question from the audience. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Commissioner Neumann noted she did not receive any notification of the meeting for public 4 <br />input. Ms. Perdu described how the notification process works. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Motion by Commissioner Neumann, seconded by Commissioner Kalar to recommend the City 7 <br />Council approve the resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit (CUP to Allow for a Double-8 <br />sided Dynamic Display Monument Sign and a 2’6” Variance from the required setback from the 9 <br />curb on the premises located at 3249 Stinson Boulevard NE. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Motion carried 5-0. 12 <br /> 13 <br />B. Consider a request for re-zoning located at 3329 and 3331 Stinson Boulevard. The 14 <br />specific request is to re-zone the property from R-1 Single Family Residential to R-2 15 <br />Two-Family Residential. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Chair Papatola opened the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Ms. Perdu reviewed staff recommendations to approve the re-zoning request, based on an 20 <br />analysis of the existing and proposed land uses in the neighborhood. The Applicant/Owners are 21 <br />Dan and Michelle Spriggs. The applicants have requested to re-zone the duplex they own located 22 <br />at 3331 and 3329 Stinson Boulevard. The existing structure is a duplex, but they have been using 23 <br />it as a single-family home for many years. They seek to now re-use it as a duplex and re-finance 24 <br />under a two-unit structure. The property is currently zoned R-1 Single-Family, which does not 25 <br />allow two-family structures. Since they have not been using it as a duplex, they are not eligible 26 <br />for such a use either in the zoning code or under the legal, non-conforming use statute. This is 27 <br />the only property that is out of sync as to the zoning and property use. Ms. Perdu described the 28 <br />adjoining properties. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Ms. Perdu reviewed and Applicable Codes and Statutes along with the analysis of the request for 31 <br />re-zoning. Ms. Perdu provided possible actions for the Commission: 32 <br /> 33 <br />1. Motion to recommend that the City Council approve the re-zoning of 3331 and 3329 Stinson 34 <br />Boulevard from R-1 Single Family Residential to R-2 Two Family Residential. 35 <br />2. Motion to recommend that the City Council deny the re-zoning of 3331 and 3329 Stinson 36 <br />Boulevard from R-1 Single Family Residential to R-2 Two Family Residential. 37 <br />3. Request Additional Information and Table the application. The applicant appears to not have 38 <br />provided enough information for the City Council to approve or deny the request. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Ms. Perdu also provided a location map, application materials and a draft resolution. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Mr. Dan Spriggs, lived at residence since 1997 and with the refinancing the underwriters need 43 <br />the zoning change. 44 <br /> 45