HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 11132018
If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City Clerk at 612-782-3313 or
email city@savmn.com. People who are deaf or hard of hearing can contact us by using 711 Relay.
Our Mission is to be a progressive and welcoming Village that is walkable, sustainable and safe.
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call.
Consideration, discussion, and possible action on all of the following items:
I.Approval of the November 13, 2018, City Council Meeting Agenda. (action requested.)
II.Proclamations and Recognitions.
III.Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which the item will be removed
from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approval of October 23, 2018, City Council meeting minutes. (pp.1-4)
B. Licenses and Permits. (pp.5)
C. Claims. (pp.7-10)
D. Resolution 18-071 a resolution Establishing an Investment Account with Multi-Bank Securities, Inc.
(pp.11)
E. Resolution 18-072 a resolution approving the 2019 Incentive SCORE Grant application request to
Ramsey County. (pp.13)
IV. Public Hearing.
A. Ordinance 2018-02 an ordinance Setting Sewer, Water, Storm Water charges and Establishment of
Fee Amounts for 2019. Shelly Rueckert, Finance Director presenting. (1st of 3 readings). (pp.15-34)
V. Reports from Commission and Staff.
A. Ordinance 2018-01 an ordinance amending the Zoning Code, Sections 152.008 Definitions and
152.177 Permitted Encroachments in Yards, related to decks. Bibi Neumann, Planning
Commissioner presenting. (1st of 3 readings) (pp.36-42)
VI. General Business of Council.
A. Resolution 18-073 a resolution Accepting the 27th Avenue/Pahl Avenue Neighborhood Traffic Study
and Adopting the Traffic Device Installation Policy. Todd Hubmer, City Engineer presenting.
(pp.43-125)
B. Resolution 18-074 a resolution Approving Ratifying the 2019-2020 Agreement between the Law
Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. #186 Local Representing the St. Anthony Police Department
Licensed Employees and the City of St. Anthony Village. Mark Casey, City Manager presenting.
(pp.127-129)
C. Resolution 18-075 a resolution Approving Ratifying the 2019-2020 Agreement between the
International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 3486 Representing the St. Anthony Fire Department
Employees and the City of St. Anthony Village. Mark Casey, City Manager presenting. (pp.131-133)
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
NOVEMBER 13, 2018
7:00 p.m.
HRA meeting immediately
after council meeting
If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City Clerk at 612-782-3313 or
email city@savmn.com. People who are deaf or hard of hearing can contact us by using 711 Relay.
Our Mission is to be a progressive and welcoming Village that is walkable, sustainable and safe.
D. Resolution 18-076 a resolution Approving Ratifying the 2019-2020 Agreement between the
International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 49 AFL-CIO Representing the St. Anthony
Public Works Department Employees and the City of St. Anthony Village. Mark Casey, City
Manager presenting. (pp.135-137)
E. Liquor Operations Updates. Mike Larson, Liquor Operations Manager presenting. (pp.139-144)
VII. Reports from City Manager and Council members.
VIII. Community Forum
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the regular agenda. Speakers
are requested to come to the podium, sign their name and address on the form at the podium, state their
name and address for the Clerk’s record, and limit their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City
Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may typically refer the matter to
staff for a future report or direct the matter to be scheduled on an upcoming agenda.
IX. Information and Announcements
X. Adjournment
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 1
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 2
OCTOBER 23, 2018 3
4
CALL TO ORDER. 5
6
Mayor Faust called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 7
8
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 9
10
Mayor Faust invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. 11
12
ROLL CALL. 13
14
Present: Mayor Faust, Councilmembers Gray, Jenson, Randle and Stille. 15
Absent: None 16
Also Present: City Manager Mark Casey, Police Chief Mangseth, Police Officer Gerbino, Public 17
Works Director Jay Hartman, GreenCorp Member Minette Saulog, and Finance 18
Director Shelly Rueckert. 19
20
21
CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING 22
ITEMS. 23
24
I. APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 23, 2018 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA. 25
26
Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the City 27
Council Meeting Agenda of October 23, 2018 as presented. 28
29
Motion carried 5-0. 30
31
II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS. 32
33
A.Swearing in of St. Anthony Village Police Officer James Gerbino.34
35
Police Chief Mangseth introduced Police Officer James Gerbino. He is the newest Police Officer 36
with the St. Anthony Police Department. Chief Mangseth provided Officer Gerbino’s 37
background. Mayor Faust conducted the swearing in of Police Officer James Gerbino. Mayor 38
Faust noted Officer Gerbino was selected out of 32 applicants. 39
40
B.GreenCorp Presentation by Minette Saulog41
42
Public Works Director Jay Hartman provided background of the GreenCorp program and 43
introduced Minette Saulog. 44
45
Ms. Saulog provided a PowerPoint presentation and gave a brief background of the program and 46
herself. Her four topics areas are Waste Reduction, Recycling & Organics Management, 47
Community Readiness and Outreach, Green Infrastructure Improvements, and Air Pollutant 48
1
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 23, 2018
Page 2
Reduction. Her service projects include City Energy Assessments, Encouraging Green 1
Transportation, Energy Efficiency Programs and General Professional Training. 2
3
Ms. Saulog reviewed the upcoming events in the City. The Tech Dump & Fix-It Clinic will be 4
held Saturday, October 27, 2018 from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at the St. Anthony Community 5
Center. 6
7
The Sustainability Fair will be held Saturday, November 17, 2018 from 1:30 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. at 8
the St. Anthony Community Center. 9
10
Ms. Minette Saulog can be reached at minette.saulog@savmn.com or 612-782-3340. 11
12
Councilmember Jenson thanked Ms. Saulog for her enthusiasm. Councilmember Stille stated the 13
caliber of people that the City receives through the GreenCorp Program are very impressive. 14
Mayor Faust welcomed Ms. Saulog to the City. 15
16
III. CONSENT AGENDA. 17
18
A. Approval of October 9, 2018, City Council Meeting Minutes. 19
B. Licenses and Permits. 20
C. Claims. 21
D. Resolution 18-070 a resolution Designating Polling Places for the 2019 Election Year. 22
23
Motion by Councilmember Randle, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the Consent 24
Agenda items. 25
26
Motion carried 5-0. 27
28
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE. 29
30
V. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF – NONE. 31
32
VI. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL. 33
34
A. Presentation of Capital Funds 2019 – 2023 & 2024-2035. 35
36
Finance Director Rueckert provided a PowerPoint presentation reviewing the 2019 – 2035 37
capital funds. The presentation reviewed capital fund parameters, capital funds, equipment and 38
fleet, building improvements, storm water improvements, park improvements, utilities 39
infrastructure improvements, streets infrastructure improvements. Ms. Rueckert reviewed each 40
fund in detail. A chart showing the debt levy relief program’s 6th year which mitigates the year to 41
year debt levy increase. Program to date has reduced $1,722,509 from cumulative debt levies. 42
Ms. Rueckert noted the 2019 – 2035 capital funds document is available on the City Website. 43
44
Councilmember Gray stated he appreciates everything Ms. Rueckert does, noting she has made 45
the finances very transparent to the taxpayers. 46
2
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 23, 2018
Page 3
1
Councilmember Stille thanked Ms. Rueckert for implementing the “bucket approach”. Each 2
bucket must be self-sustaining. The detail provided is amazing. 3
4
Councilmember Randle asked about the timeline and date for the projects and asked about the 5
fleet (dump truck). Ms. Rueckert stated there is a replacement schedule for the fleet. 6
7
Councilmember Jenson referred to the complete report and noted it is very detailed. 8
9
Mayor Faust stated the plan through 2035 is a living document and will change from year to 10
year. The plan allows for a systematic approach for replacement of items. Mayor Faust stated 11
Ms. Rueckert did an excellent job on the plan. 12
13
VII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. 14
15
City Manager Casey stated the road construction project on Foss, Macalester, and Highcrest has 16
gone on longer than desired. Beginning November 1, the City could impose any liquidated 17
damages if the project is not done. It is anticipated the project will be completed by October 31, 18
2018. Mayor Faust noted a portion of the contract includes retainage. WSB oversees the work. 19
20
Councilmember Gray reported as the liaison to the North Suburban Communications and Access 21
Corporations. He recapped what is going on with CTV15, noting a summary of the September 22
2018 North Suburban CTV production and programming was provided. 23
24
Councilmember Randle stated on October 20, he and Councilmember Jenson had Coffee with 25
the Council. He suggested the concept be revisited in the future. 26
27
Councilmember Jenson stated the Coffee with the Council was held at Emerald Park. 28
29
Mayor Faust reported on October 17, he and City Staff met with Hennepin County engineers and 30
Hennepin County Commissioner regarding the high-speed turnoff on 88. He is not encouraged or 31
discouraged. The City highlighted the safety issue. 32
33
VIII. COMMUNITY FORUM 34
35
Dr. Bibi Neumann, 3404 Silver Lane NE, read a joint statement from St. Anthony Villagers for 36
Equity and Community and Communities United Against Police Brutality. Dr. Neumann also 37
read a written statement with recommendations. 38
39
IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. 40
41
Mayor Faust encouraged residents to attend the Tech Dump and Fix-It Clinic to be held on 42
Saturday. He also encouraged residents to vote on November 6. 43
44
X. ADJOURNMENT. 45
46
3
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 23, 2018
Page 4
Mayor Faust adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m. 1
2
Respectfully submitted, 3
Debbie Wolfe 4
TimeSaver off Site Secretarial, Inc. 5
6
7
8
Mayor 9
ATTEST: 10
City Clerk 11
12
13
4
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: November 13, 2018 Approved:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: License Clerk
ITEM: License and Permits for Approval:
General Contractors Licenses:
A Tree Service & Landscape, Minneapolis, MN
AllFab Railings & Metalworks, Fargo, ND
Versacon, New Hope, MN
Mechanical Licenses:
Air America Heating & Cooling, Cedar, MN
Michal’s HHH, Anoka, MN
Perfect Climate, Faribault, MN
The Heating Guy, Minneapolis, MN
Woodys Heating, West St Paul, MN
Rental Licenses:
Applicant: Charles Elliott
Location: 3404 Silver Lake Rd NE
5
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
6
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 10/17/2018 - 11/14/2018 Nov 07, 2018 03:19PM
Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
12705 ANDERSON, BENJAMIN 36465 10/17/2018 54.00
11211 PETTY CASH - U.S. BANK 36466 10/19/2018 167.63
11798 CENTRAL PENSION FUND LOCAL #49 36467 10/19/2018 3,840.00
11809 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY SUNSHINE FUND 36468 10/19/2018 231.50
10710 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 36469 10/19/2018 1,625.00
11813 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 36470 10/19/2018 16.00
11808 SAPD ASSOCIATION 36471 10/19/2018 393.00
12077 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 36472 10/19/2018 829.85
10710 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 36473 11/02/2018 1,625.00
11792 INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL #49 36474 11/02/2018 420.00
11793 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES 36475 11/02/2018 833.00
10002 LOCAL UNION IAFF #3486 36476 11/02/2018 297.75
1118 56 BREWING 36477 11/14/2018 566.00
1121 ABLE SEED HOUSE + BREWERY 36478 11/14/2018 364.00
10054 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL 36479 11/14/2018 523.00
10056 ALLIED MEDICAL PRODUCTS 36480 11/14/2018 317.05
1122 AM CRAFTS SPIRITS 36481 11/14/2018 193.20
1054 AMERICAN BOTTLING CO 36482 11/14/2018 126.16
10078 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN 36483 11/14/2018 208.00
10098 ARAMARK 36484 11/14/2018 333.24
1100 ARTISIAN BEER COMPANY 36485 11/14/2018 6,966.77
10115 ASPEN MILLS 36486 11/14/2018 684.78
10116 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC 36487 11/14/2018 159.32
12461 AXON ENTERPRISES INC 36488 11/14/2018 2,245.00
10147 BASARA, JOE 36489 11/14/2018 14.50
10156 BEARCOM 36490 11/14/2018 464.95
10159 BEISSWENGER'S 36491 11/14/2018 8.00
1013 BELLBOY CORPORATION 36492 11/14/2018 6,443.81
1014 BELLBOY CORPORATION 36493 11/14/2018 224.00
1035 BERNICK'S BEVERAGE & VENDING 36494 11/14/2018 5,139.22
2009 BLACK STACK BREWING 36495 11/14/2018 432.00
8544 BOURGET IMPORTS 36496 11/14/2018 243.50
12622 BOYER TRUCKS PARTS DISTRIBUTION CTR 36497 11/14/2018 233.81
10188 BRAKE & EQUIPMENT WAREHOUSE 36498 11/14/2018 50.64
1018 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER 36499 11/14/2018 26,631.89
1011 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS 36500 11/14/2018 5,931.49
1009 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS 36501 11/14/2018 4,383.77
10206 BROCK WHITE COMPANY LLC 36502 11/14/2018 33.50
2014 BROKEN CLOCK BREWING 36503 11/14/2018 198.00
12122 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 36504 11/14/2018 644.26
1114 CANNON RIVER WINERY 36505 11/14/2018 432.00
1017 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 36506 11/14/2018 18,684.71
10254 CENTRAL LOCK & SAFE CO 36507 11/14/2018 96.95
12596 CINTAS 36508 11/14/2018 1,268.70
10290 CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON 36509 11/14/2018 300.84
12150 CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON 36510 11/14/2018 16,449.97
10293 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 36511 11/14/2018 12,161.10
10306 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE INC 36512 11/14/2018 85.50
10308 CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT 36513 11/14/2018 35,400.50
12318 COMMERCIAL BUSINESS FORMS 36514 11/14/2018 643.88
10332 COMPTON'S COMMERCIAL CLNG. INC 36515 11/14/2018 3,578.00
10338 CONNELLY ELECTRONICS 36516 11/14/2018 6,014.00
12561 CORE & MAIN LP 36517 11/14/2018 209.21
7
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 2
Check Issue Dates: 10/17/2018 - 11/14/2018 Nov 07, 2018 03:19PM
Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
1042 CRYSTAL SPRINGS ICE 36518 11/14/2018 341.09
12720 CYCLONE LIGHTING 36519 11/14/2018 5,259.00
10438 D ROCK CENTER & SMALL ENG 36520 11/14/2018 27.95
10411 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 36521 11/14/2018 355.20
10414 DIEGNAU, DANIEL 36522 11/14/2018 31.39
10423 DODGE OF BURNSVILLE,INC 36523 11/14/2018 25,717.00
1063 DOMACE VINO 36524 11/14/2018 2,424.00
10432 DORSEY & WHITNEY 36525 11/14/2018 14,595.11
10436 DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICES 36526 11/14/2018 21.75
10517 FIRE SAFETY USA, INC.36527 11/14/2018 4,440.00
10526 FLEETPRIDE 36528 11/14/2018 1,489.61
10544 FREEWAY TOWING 36529 11/14/2018 91.27
12706 GETTER, MYRON P 36530 11/14/2018 5.22
12137 GLASS & MIRROR INC 36531 11/14/2018 1,285.00
10571 GOLIATH HYDRO-VAC, INC.36532 11/14/2018 6,720.00
10573 GOODIN COMPANY 36533 11/14/2018 95.76
10578 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 36534 11/14/2018 371.35
10585 GRAINGER 36535 11/14/2018 59.88
1032 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC.36536 11/14/2018 1,414.50
1021 GREAT LAKES COCA COLA 36537 11/14/2018 447.80
12432 GROMEK, BRANDON 36538 11/14/2018 125.00
10624 HAWKINS, INC 36539 11/14/2018 1,635.10
10636 HEDBACK, ARENDT & CARLSON PLLC 36540 11/14/2018 3,500.00
10661 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 36541 11/14/2018 432.00
12711 HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE 36542 11/14/2018 2,905.00
12691 HENSEL, JOHN 36543 11/14/2018 242.00
1019 HOHENSTEIN'S, INC 36544 11/14/2018 5,260.27
12717 HOLMBERG, JOHN 36545 11/14/2018 1,501.00
10684 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 36546 11/14/2018 236.70
2020 HUNYUCK BREWING 36547 11/14/2018 135.00
2013 INBOUND BREWCO 36548 11/14/2018 1,553.50
1027 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 36549 11/14/2018 833.55
11754 INTEGRATED LOSS CONTROL, INC.36550 11/14/2018 604.00
12315 IRC RETAIL CENTERS SALO PARK 36551 11/14/2018 2,812.32
12313 IRC RETAIL CENTERS SLV LIQ 36552 11/14/2018 2,284.83
1016 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 36553 11/14/2018 30,411.64
1102 JOHNSON BROTHERS 36554 11/14/2018 6,273.39
1004 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.36555 11/14/2018 16,470.09
1005 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.36556 11/14/2018 8,786.43
1006 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.36557 11/14/2018 6,426.78
1044 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.36558 11/14/2018 17,422.14
12713 JORDAHL REDLIN, ERIN 36559 11/14/2018 74.50
10786 KEEPERS, INC.36560 11/14/2018 129.58
10797 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 36561 11/14/2018 57.90
10812 LAMERE CONCRETE & MASONRY 36562 11/14/2018 8,078.00
10830 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 36563 11/14/2018 75.00
10831 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 36564 11/14/2018 2,460.00
2010 LUPULIN BREWING 36565 11/14/2018 477.00
1022 M. AMUNDSON LLP 36566 11/14/2018 2,801.36
10874 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT GROUP 36567 11/14/2018 411.35
12712 MAIN STREET LIGHTING 36568 11/14/2018 4,455.00
10882 MAMA 36569 11/14/2018 50.00
11985 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 36570 11/14/2018 11,768.21
8
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 3
Check Issue Dates: 10/17/2018 - 11/14/2018 Nov 07, 2018 03:19PM
Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
12474 MARS SUPPLY 36571 11/14/2018 49.71
10931 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL - WASTEWATER 36572 11/14/2018 59,047.23
10939 MIDWAY FORD 36573 11/14/2018 403.12
10947 MIDWEST SIGN & SCREEN PRINTING 36574 11/14/2018 26.92
2005 MILK AND HONEY CIDERS 36575 11/14/2018 290.00
11037 MINNESOTA DEPT PUBLIC SAFETY 36576 11/14/2018 40.00
10994 MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 36577 11/14/2018 62.00
12718 MINNESOTA REVENUE PETROLEUM TAX 36578 11/14/2018 25.00
12710 MITCHELL, JOE 36579 11/14/2018 578.00
11061 MORRELL ENTERPRISES LP 36580 11/14/2018 1,339.80
12708 NEAL, DON 36581 11/14/2018 108.96
12374 NEOFUNDS BY NEOPOST 36582 11/14/2018 700.00
1051 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY 36583 11/14/2018 105.50
12709 NGUYEN, VAN HA 36584 11/14/2018 36.07
11131 NORTH SUBURBAN ACCESS CORPORATION.36585 11/14/2018 983.70
11163 OFFICE DEPOT 36586 11/14/2018 1,100.49
12112 OREILLY AUTO PARTS 36587 11/14/2018 60.11
11185 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.36588 11/14/2018 1,993.50
1012 PAUSTIS & SONS 36589 11/14/2018 3,362.21
1001 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 36590 11/14/2018 5,716.00
1002 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 36591 11/14/2018 9,818.85
12502 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT, LLC 36592 11/14/2018 831.00
12447 PMG 56 LLC MN SERIES 36593 11/14/2018 77.20
11246 PRAXAIR 36594 11/14/2018 41.35
12008 PREMIER LIGHTING 36595 11/14/2018 412.82
12715 PREMIUM QUALITY LIGHTING 36596 11/14/2018 101.60
12311 PUCKETTS RECYCLING 36597 11/14/2018 40.00
1062 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY 36598 11/14/2018 108.00
1020 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 36599 11/14/2018 89.46
11345 ROSEVILLE CHRYSLER DODGE 36600 11/14/2018 306.68
11359 RUSHTON/KIEL 36601 11/14/2018 131.65
12469 RYAN CONTRACTING COMPANY 36602 11/14/2018 157,401.07
12719 SAULOG, MINETTE 36603 11/14/2018 109.00
12707 SCOVIL, NANCY 36604 11/14/2018 27.38
12346 SHRED IT 36605 11/14/2018 44.00
11430 SOUTH/JAMES 36606 11/14/2018 44.79
1024 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 36607 11/14/2018 5,461.90
1008 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 36608 11/14/2018 6,154.61
1026 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 36609 11/14/2018 9,832.70
1036 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 36610 11/14/2018 407.84
12714 SPRIGGS, MR & MRS 36611 11/14/2018 530.81
12716 ST CROIX RECREATION FUN PLAYGROUNDS 36612 11/14/2018 567.00
11457 ST ANTHONY VILLAGE CENTER, LLC 36613 11/14/2018 2,136.33
2001 STEEL TOE BREWING 36614 11/14/2018 96.00
12366 STREET FLEET 36615 11/14/2018 72.80
11502 STREICHER'S 36616 11/14/2018 122.50
12123 SUMMIT COMPANIES 36617 11/14/2018 594.00
11566 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 36618 11/14/2018 460.50
12702 TOKLE INSPECTIONS INC 36619 11/14/2018 850.40
11586 TRACY PRINTING 36620 11/14/2018 515.80
1040 TRUE BRANDS INC 36621 11/14/2018 1,220.62
11609 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR 36622 11/14/2018 1,075.75
11612 TWIN CITY JANITOR SUPPLY 36623 11/14/2018 288.00
9
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 4
Check Issue Dates: 10/17/2018 - 11/14/2018 Nov 07, 2018 03:19PM
Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
11637 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 36624 11/14/2018 40.80
2007 URBAN GROWLER 36625 11/14/2018 264.00
11674 VERIZON WIRELESS 36626 11/14/2018 1,800.85
11932 VILLAGE EXPRESS WASH 36627 11/14/2018 142.80
1025 VINOCOPIA 36628 11/14/2018 497.50
11704 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 36629 11/14/2018 547.84
11706 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 36630 11/14/2018 279.63
1034 WINE COMPANY/THE 36631 11/14/2018 667.50
1038 WINE MERCHANTS INC 36632 11/14/2018 2,878.11
11731 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GRP, INC.36633 11/14/2018 165.58
11738 WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.36634 11/14/2018 54,546.05
Grand Totals: 713,134.86
10
CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 18-071
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN INVESTMENT ACCOUNT WITH MULTI-
BANK SECURITIES, INC.
WHEREAS, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, is currently providing investments services to
the City of Saint Anthony Village.
WHEREAS, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC, has made the decision to cease providing
investments services to municipalities including the City of Saint Anthony Village, by 3/29/2019.
WHEREAS, In order to transfer investment assets held at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC the
City of Saint Anthony Village needs to establish a new brokerage account in its name.
WHEREAS, In order to maintain continuity in the management of these investment assets the
City of Saint Anthony Village choses to establish an account at RBC Wealth Management,
Minneapolis under the supervision of its former Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC broker.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the City Manager and Finance
Director to establish an Investments account with RBC Wealth Management, Minneapolis.
Adopted this 13th day of November, 2018.
______________________________________
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
ATTEST:____________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Review for Administration: _____________________________________
Mark Casey, City Manager
11
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
12
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 18-072
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2019 INCENTIVE SCORE GRANT REQUEST TO
RAMSEY COUNTY
WHEREAS, Ramsey County is accepting applications for the use of SCORE funds to improve
recycling participation by the public; and
WHEREAS, The Organics policy in the Ramsey County Solid Waste Management Master Plan
states that the yard-waste and organic waste recycling sites are “only for residents of
Ramsey County”; and
WHEREAS, A portion of the City of Saint Anthony is within Hennepin County, and City residents
within that area have been allowed to use the County's yard waste sites since 2005,
pursuant to a joint powers agreement between the City and Ramsey County; and
WHEREAS, the City of Saint Anthony forgoes receipt of its allocated base SCORE funds for use of
the Ramsey County yard waste and organic waste recycling sites available to all of its
residents
WHEREAS, The City of Saint Anthony is eligible to apply for incentive funding for 2019 for public
education and promotion of the new organics drop off site located in the Community
Center parking lot and
WHEREAS, The City of Saint Anthony is eligible to apply for incentive funding for 2019 for
enhanced public education at our annual spring clean-up day held the first Saturday in
May; and
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village approves the 2019
Incentive SCORE grant application to Ramsey County for the maximum amount of $1,694.00.
Adopted this 13th day of November, 2018.
_________________________________________
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
ATTEST:___________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Review for Administration: _______________________________________
Mark Casey, City Manager
13
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
14
TO: MARK CASEY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: SHELLY RUECKERT, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: 2019 UTILITY RATES
DATE: OCTOBER 30, 2018
The utility rates recommended herein for 2019 builds on the multi-year approach
towards rate adjustments that began in 2012. The parameters used for adjusting rates
are as follows:
Align revenue sources with corresponding costs
Provide transparency as to the basis of rates and rate adjustments
Maintain a structural balanced operation
Ensure that rates appropriately support the ability to:
o Provide safe drinking water
o Properly discharge sanitary sewer flows
o Appropriately control and treat stormwater runoff
Water Rates:
As part of the annual rate adjustment process the water production and distribution
costs are categorized as fixed in nature or usage driven. The 2019 budgeted water costs
are comprised of $628,128 in fixed costs and $666,817 in usage driven costs, see table
below:
OPERATING DEPRECIATION OVERALL
FIXED 452,243 45% 175,885 63% 628,128 49%
USAGE 563,520 55% 103,297 37% 666,817 51%
1,015,763 100% 279,182 100% 1,294,945 100%
15
The Multiyear approach to water rates includes the phase in of the flat fee which began
in 2016. The transition process expected the usage rate growth to decelerate as flat fee
was phased-in. Based on estimated actual results for 2018 and updated 2019 budgeted
costs that expectation is reflected in the proposed rates for 2019.
Proposed 2019 water rates:
2018 2019
Per 1000 gallons Rates Rates $ Increase
Water Tier I 3.07 3.07 ‐
Water Tier II 3.24 3.24 ‐
Water Tier III 3.55 3.55 ‐
Water Tier IV 4.08 4.08 ‐
Water Tier V 5.12 5.12 ‐
Irrigation 4.08 4.08 ‐
Quarterly flat fee 6.70 10.05 3.35
The above rates are projected to produce $1,058,928 in revenues assuming water
consumption similar to 2018. At this level of revenues the operating income before
depreciation is budgeted to be $43,165.
The recommendation’s impact on 2019 Water bills are reflected below:
2019 Tier Rates 3.07 3.07 3.24 3.55 4.08 5.12
2019 Usage levels 4,600 7,500 15,000 22,500 30,000 37,500
Fixed Fee 10.05 10.05 10.05 10.05 10.05 10.05
Usage 14.12 23.02 47.30 73.95 104.54 142.93
2019 Billing 24.17 33.07 57.35 84.00 114.59 152.98
2018 Billing 20.82 29.72 54.00 80.65 111.24 149.63
DIFFERENCE 3.35 3.35 3.35 3.35 3.35 3.35
16
Sewer Rates:
As part of the annual rate adjustment process the sewer treatment and collection system
costs are categorized as fixed in nature or flow volume driven. The 2019 budgeted
sewer costs are comprised of $477,265 in fixed costs and $784,407 in flow volume driven
costs (usage), see table below:
OPERATING DEPRECIATION OVERALL
FIXED 406,312 35% 70,953 70% 477,265 38%
USAGE 753,998 65% 30,409 30% 784,407 62%
1,160,310 100% 101,362 100% 1,261,672 100%
The Multiyear approach to sewer rates also includes the phase in of the flat fee. As part
of the transition process the usage rate growth was expected to decelerate as flat fee was
phased-in. Based on estimated actual results for 2018 and updated 2019 budgeted costs
that expectation is reflected in the proposed rates for 2019.
Proposed 2019 Sewer rates are below:
2018 2019
Per 1000 gallons Rates Rates $ Increase
Sewer Usage rate 4.69 4.69 -
Qtr. Collection system charge 6.40 9.60 3.20
The above rates are projected to produce $1,213,153 in revenues in 2018. At this level of
revenues the operating income before depreciation is budgeted to be $52,843.
The recommendation’s impact on 2018 billings is reflected below:
2019 Tier Rates 4.69 4.69 4.69 4.69 4.69 4.69
2019 Usage levels 4,600 7,500 15,000 22,500 30,000 37,500
Fixed Fee 9.60 9.60 9.60 9.60 9.60 9.60
Usage 21.57 35.18 70.35 105.53 140.70 175.88
2019 Billing 31.17 44.78 79.95 115.13 150.30 185.48
2018 Billing 27.97 41.58 76.75 111.92 147.10 182.28
DIFFERENCE 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
17
Stormwater rates:
The multi-year approach to Stormwater rates in place since 2012 called for an annual
increase for single family residential (classifications 2 & 3) of thirty-five cent ($.35)
increase. This represents a 2.22% increase in rate and should generate $4,440 in
additional revenues (assuming no new construction). The 2.22% rate increase will be
applied to all levels of stormwater charges. The historical impact on a residential single
family user is as follows:
The rate increase for other land use categories is consistent with the increase in single
family residential (classifications 2 & 3) as see below:
Quarterly Bill Usage Rate % Change
2011 $13.00 - -
2012 $13.35 $0.35 2.69
2013 $13.70 $0.35 2.62
2014 $14.05 $0.35 2.55
2015 $14.40 $0.35 2.49
2016 $14.75 $0.35 2.43
2017 $15.10 $0.35 2.32
2018 $15.45 $0.35 2.27
2019 $15.80 $0.35 2.22
Classification-Land Use Proposed 2019 Charge 2018 Charge % Change
1-Cemeteries, parks, golf
courses, railroads, vacant land
$65.51 per acre $64.10 per acre 2.22%
2- R-1, R-1a, and R-2
residential
$63.20 per unit $61.80 per unit 2.22%
3- R-3 residential $63.20 per unit $61.80 per unit 2.22%
4- Schools and institutional
uses
$150.87 per acre $147.62 per acre 2.22%
5- R-4 Residential , churches
and manufactured home parks
$192.42 per acre $188.28 per acre 2.22%
6- Commercial and industrial $240.38 per acre $235.21 per acre 2.22%
18
The overall annual impact of the recommended rates for a residential customer at
each of the five tier level is a flat increase per tier, see below:
The Water/Sewer Utility fund summary budget is attached as Exhibit A.
Lastly a long range Utility revenues plan is attached as Exhibit B. The plan addressed
a 2017 strategic plan goal to develop long term revenue planning. The rates are being
managed to begin supporting capital needs of the water and sewer operations. The
current plan projects that support to begin in 2022 with a transfer to Utilities
Infrastructure fund.
The plan includes assumptions regarding future City costs and MCES treatment costs. It
also factors in the retirement of water /sewer bonds occurring in 2024. A minimum cash
balance was established to recognize that the quarterly billing and collection process is
recovering 90-120 days of prior cash outlays. No growth in accounts or usage was
factored in the projection. Real growth will be noted annually through the process of
updating the base year results. With these factors in place the phase-in of the flat fee
and usage rate adjustments were determined. Staff believes the model will help guide
year to year rate increases while being flexible enough to keep the annual increases
reasonable for utility customers.
As always your comments and suggestions are welcomed.
Tier Level 1st -7,500 2nd -15,000 3rd -22,000 4th -30,000 5th- 37,500
Distribution (1st Qrt. 2018)32% 46% 17% 3% 2%
2019 Proposed 93.64 153.10 214.93 280.69 354.26
2018 Actual 86.74 146.20 208.03 273.79 347.36
Quarterly Increase 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90
Annual Increase 27.60 27.60 27.60 27.60 27.60
19
20
Fiscal Year 2019
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL BUDGET
REVENUES 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 2019
Water Operations 880,851$ 875,407$ 897,232$ 917,927$ 945,788$ 1,044,818$ 985,721$ 1,058,928$
Sewer Operations 849,032 914,442 947,618 1,005,329 1,098,938 1,174,957 1,131,590 1,213,153
Total Operating Revenues 1,729,883$ 1,789,849$ 1,844,850$ 1,923,256$ 2,044,726$ 2,219,775$ 2,117,311$ 2,272,081$
EXPENDITURES
Water Operations 619,477$ 601,617$ 618,069$ 787,497$ 841,508$ 940,252$ 974,111$ 1,015,763$
Sewer Operations 937,717 982,557 963,621 930,659 1,029,372 1,118,985 1,115,154 1,160,310
Total Operating Expenditures 1,557,194$ 1,584,174$ 1,581,690$ 1,718,156$ 1,870,880$ 2,059,237$ 2,089,265$ 2,176,073$
Combined Operating Income 172,689$ 205,675$ 263,160$ 205,100$ 173,846$ 160,537$ 28,045$ 96,008$
Other (Income)/Expense
Water (41,064)$ (4,214)$ (1,938)$ (11,143)$ (40,051)$ 10,100$ (18,500)$ (26,795)$
Sewer (99,138)(5,828)(21,139)(14,045)(36,189)(550)(22,650)(34,550)
Interest Income - - (499) (23,907) (11,500) (13,605) (13,605) (13,605)
Depreciation Expense 268,981 288,955 308,955 332,399 352,399 371,766 371,766 391,766
Total Other (Income)/Expense 128,779 278,913 285,380 283,304 264,659 367,711 317,011 316,816
Net Income/(Loss) 43,911$ (73,238)$ (22,220)$ (78,204)$ (90,813)$ (207,174)$ (288,965)$ (220,808)$
Other Sources and Uses:
Transfers Out -$ -$ (15,000)$ (225,000)$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Transfers In - - - 1,632,862 - - - -
Debt Service Payments (153,458) (137,700) (140,450) (138,150) (145,750) (148,200) (148,200) (145,600)
Net Change in Assets / Liabilities 11,622 (39,142) (46,105) 49,451 - - - -
Proceeds Bonding/Army 13,524 - - 130,932 - - - -
Add back Depreciation Expense 268,981 288,955 308,955 332,399 352,399 371,766 371,766 391,766
Total Other Sources and Uses 140,669 112,113 107,400 1,782,494 206,649 223,566 223,566 246,166
Net increase (decrease) in cash 184,580$ 38,875$ 85,180$ 1,704,290$ 115,836$ 16,393$ (65,399)$ 25,358$
BEGINNING CASH BALANCE (182,618) 1,962 40,837 126,017 1,830,307 1,946,143 1,946,143 1,880,745
ENDING CASH BALANCE 1,962$ 40,837$ 126,017$ 1,830,307$ 1,946,143$ 1,962,537$ 1,880,745$ 1,906,104$
EXHIBIT A
UTILITY FUND SUMMARY
21
Fiscal Year 2018
Assumptions 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Water Rates
Flat Fee N/A N/A 3.35$ 6.70$ 10.05$ 13.40$ 16.75$ 20.10$ 23.45$ 24.39$ 25.36$ 26.38$ 27.43$ 28.53$ 29.67$ 30.86$ 32.09$
Usage (Tier one)3.10$ 3.10$ 3.07$ 3.07$ 3.04$ 3.01$ 2.98$ 2.95$ 3.07 3.19 3.32 3.45 3.59 3.73 3.88 4.04
Sewer Rates
Flat Fee N/A 3.20$ 6.40$ 9.60$ 12.80$ 16.00$ 19.20$ 22.40$ 25.60$ 26.50 27.42 28.38 29.38 30.40 31.47 32.57
Usage 4.62$ 4.69$ 4.69$ 4.64$ 4.60$ 4.60$ 4.60$ 4.60$ 4.85 5.12 5.40 5.69 6.01 6.34 6.69
Expenses
Met Council - $ Actual 593,381 576,237 643,390 708,567 5.50%5.50%5.50%5.50%5.50%5.50%5.50%5.50%5.50%5.50%5.50%5.50%5.50%
Met Council - % Increase -4.57%-2.89%11.65%10.13%NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
City Water Expenses - % Increase 4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%
City Sewer Expenses - % Increase 3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%
Actual Actual Actual Est. Actual Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected REVENUES 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Water Operations 897,232$ 917,927 945,788 985,721 1,058,928 1,157,839 1,214,736 1,271,707 1,328,814 1,381,967 1,437,246 1,494,735 1,554,525 1,616,706 1,681,374 1,748,629 1,818,574
Sewer Operations 947,618 1,005,329 1,098,938 1,131,590 1,213,153 1,276,503 1,327,371 1,388,557 1,449,742 1,526,225 1,600,071 1,677,491 1,758,657 1,843,750 1,932,960 2,026,487 2,124,539
Total Operating Revenues 1,844,850$ 1,923,256$ 2,044,726$ 2,117,311$ 2,272,081$ 2,434,342$ 2,542,107$ 2,660,264$ 2,778,557$ 2,908,191$ 3,037,317$ 3,172,226$ 3,313,182$ 3,460,456$ 3,614,334$ 3,775,116$ 3,943,113$
EXPENDITURES
Water Operations 618,069$ 787,497 841,508 974,111 1,015,763 1,056,394 1,098,649 1,142,595 1,188,299 1,235,831 1,285,264 1,336,675 1,390,142 1,445,747 1,503,577 1,563,720 1,626,269
Sewer Operations 963,621 930,659 1,029,372 1,115,154 1,160,310 1,228,162 1,286,921 1,348,604 1,413,361 1,481,350 1,552,737 1,627,698 1,706,416 1,789,085 1,875,910 1,967,105 2,062,896
Total Operating Expenditures 1,581,690 1,718,156 1,870,880 2,089,265 2,176,073 2,284,556 2,385,570 2,491,199 2,601,660 2,717,181 2,838,002 2,964,373 3,096,558 3,234,833 3,379,487 3,530,825 3,689,165
Combined Operating Income 263,160$ 205,100$ 173,846$ 28,046$ 96,008$ 149,786$ 156,537$ 169,065$ 176,897$ 191,010$ 199,315$ 207,854$ 216,624$ 225,623$ 234,847$ 244,291$ 253,948$
Other (Income)/Expense
Water (1,938)(11,143)(40,051)(18,500)(26,795)(26,745)(26,695)(26,645)(26,595)(26,545)(26,495)(26,445)(26,395)(26,345)(26,295)(26,245)(26,195)
Sewer (21,139) (14,045) (36,189) (22,650) (34,550) (34,500) (34,450) (34,400) (34,350) (34,300) (34,250) (34,200) (34,150) (34,100) (34,050) (34,000) (33,950)
Interest income (499) (23,907) (11,500) (13,605) (13,605) (28,170) (33,041) (37,055) (40,344) (44,777) (46,505) (48,497) (50,762) (53,306) (56,139) (59,267) (59,564)
Depreciation Expense 308,955 332,399 352,399 371,766 391,766 426,766 461,766 496,766 531,766 566,766 601,766 636,766 671,766 706,766 741,766 776,766 811,766
Total Other (Income)/Expense 285,380 283,304 264,659 317,011 316,816 337,351 367,580 398,666 430,477 461,144 494,516 527,624 560,459 593,015 625,282 657,254 692,057
Net Income/(Loss) (22,220)$ (78,204)$ (90,813)$ (288,965)$ (220,808)$ (187,565)$ (211,043)$ (229,601)$ (253,581)$ (270,133)$ (295,201)$ (319,770)$ (343,835)$ (367,392)$ (390,435)$ (412,963)$ (438,110)$
Other Sources and Uses:
Transfers- in - 1,632,862 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Transfers Out CIP (15,000) (225,000) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Transfers Out - W/S Infrastructure - - - - - - - (75,000) (115,000) (140,000) (175,000) (175,000) (175,000) (175,000) (175,000) (175,000) (175,000)
Army Reimbursements - 130,932 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Debt Service Payments (140,450) (138,150) (145,750) (148,200) (145,600) (147,950) (150,200) (147,400) (149,550) (156,550) - - - - - - -
Net Change in Assets / Liabilities (46,105) 49,451 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Add back Depreciation Expense 308,955 332,399 352,399 371,766 391,766 426,766 461,766 496,766 531,766 566,766 601,766 636,766 671,766 706,766 741,766 776,766 811,766
Total Other Sources and Uses 107,400 1,782,494 206,649 223,566 246,166 278,816 311,566 274,366 267,216 270,216 426,766 461,766 496,766 531,766 566,766 601,766 636,766
Net increase (decrease) in cash 85,180$ 1,704,290$ 115,836$ (65,398)$ 25,358$ 91,251$ 100,523$ 44,765$ 13,635$ 83$ 131,565$ 141,996$ 152,931$ 164,374$ 176,331$ 188,803$ 198,656$
BEGINNING CASH BALANCE 40,837 126,017 1,830,307 1,946,143 1,880,745 1,906,103 1,997,355 2,097,878 2,142,643 2,156,278 2,156,361 2,287,926 2,429,922 2,582,853 2,747,227 2,923,558 3,112,361
ENDING CASH BALANCE 126,017$ 1,830,307$ 1,946,143$ 1,880,745$ 1,906,103$ 1,997,355$ 2,097,878$ 2,142,643$ 2,156,278$ 2,156,361$ 2,287,926$ 2,429,922$ 2,582,853$ 2,747,227$ 2,923,558$ 3,112,361$ 3,311,018$
MINIMUM CASH BALANCE 755,400 779,235 827,325 853,970 902,960 959,397 997,569 1,034,155 1,075,736 1,125,947 1,012,439 1,057,409 1,104,394 1,153,485 1,204,778 1,176,942 1,229,722
EXHIBIT B
22
CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 2018-02
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS §33.018 SEWER CHARGES TO OWNERS;
33.036 WATER CHARGES TO OWNERS, §33.090 CHARGES FOR STORM WATER
FACILITIES AND SECTION §33.061 ESTABLISHMENT OF FEE AMOUNTS
The City Council of the City of Saint Anthony Village ordains as follows:
Section One. Amendment to the City of Saint Anthony Village City Code Sections
§33.018, 33.036 and §33.090 of the City Code of the City of Saint Anthony Village is hereby
amended as follows. The deleted language is represented by strikethrough text. The additional
language is represented by underlined text.
33.018 SEWER RATES: Usage rate $4.69 per 1,000 gallons, quarterly Collection system
charge $9.646.40 per residential equivalency unit.
33.036 WATER RATES.
Water Usage billing will be computed quarterly based on metered water used according to the
tiered rates system below, quarterly Distribution system charge $10.056.70 per residential
equivalency unit.
33.090 STORM WATER FACILITIES: (billed quarterly)
33.061 ESTABLISHMENT OF FEE AMOUNTS.
These fees are set by Resolution as stated in §33.062. The dollar amounts of feess required by
this code as stated in the following table. In addition to the application fee, applicants are
responsible for the City’s out-of-pocket costs for the planner, engineer, attorney and/or other
consultants to review the application. To provide for payment of such costs, the applicant will
make a deposit (escrow) with the city at the end of the tie of application submittal, in an amount
determined by the City Manager. If costs are less than the deposit (escrow), the difference will be
billed to the applicant.
Classification Charge (per acre)
1 $65.5164.10
2 $63.2061.80
3 $63.2061.80
4 $150.87147.62
5 $192.42188.28
6 $240.38235.21
23
BUILDING PERMIT Total Valuation
$1 to $500 $29.50
$501 to $2,000 $28 for the first $500 plus $3.70/additional $100 or
fraction thereof, to including $2,000
$2,001 to $25,000 $83.50 for the first $2,000 plus $16.55/additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof, to including $25,000
$25,001 to $50,000 $464.15 for the first $25,000 plus $12.00/additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof, to including $50,000
$50,001 to $100,000 $764.15 for the first $50,000 plus $8.45/additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof, to including $100,000
$100,001 to $500,000 $1,186.65 for the first $100,000 plus $6.75/additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof, to including $500,000
$500,001 to $1,000,000 $3,886.65 for the first $500,000 plus $5.50/additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof, to including $1,000,000
$1,000,001 and up $6,636.65 for the first $1,000,000 plus $4.50/additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof
Inspections outside of normal business hours
(minimum charge, 2 hours)
$65.0063.25 per hour
Reinspection; fees assessed under provisions of §32.08 $65.0063.25 per hour
Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated
(minimum charge, 1/2 hour)
$65.0063.25 per hour
Additional plan review required by changes, additions,
or revisions to plans (minimum charge, 1/2 hour)
$65.0063.25 per hour
For use of outside consultants for plan checking and
inspections, or both
Actual costs**
NOTES TO TABLE:
* Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision,
overhead, equipment, hourly wages, and fringe benefits of the employees involved.
** Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs.
A plan review fee of 65% of the permit fee will be charged for building permits which require the submittal of
plans. Fees for similar plans will be charged in accordance with provisions of Minn. Rules, Chapter 1300.0160,
subd. 5.
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
Purpose of Fee:
Residential or Commercial
Building or Garage Electrical panel
change out, repair or service
upgrade, new panel replacement is
$100.00
Up to 300 amps $50.00
400 amps $58.00
For each additional 100 amps add $14.00
Reconnected circuits Charge for each $3.00
Residential or Commercial
Building or Garage New circuits or
reconnected circuits spliced outside
of electric panel are at full fee
Charge for each up to 30 amps $8.00
Charge for each up to 100 amps $10.00
For each additional 100 amps add $5.00
New Home
New Single Family Residence or
Building Remodel up to 200 amps
and 30 circuits used or less -
includes a maximum of 3
inspection trips (There is no
maximum fee if the service is larger
than 200 amps)
$150.00
24
All Remodel Projects Single Family Residence or Building Remodel Total
costs equals required number of inspections trips
multiplied by $35 each or the total cost of the circuits
being used whichever is greater, but not both.
Multi-Family Dwelling with 3 or more Units Each
housing unit - up to 200 amps with a meter bank
application and 20 circuits or less
$70.00
Additional inspection trip $40.0035.00
House Wiring and service is separate. Above fees apply
Transformers 0 -10 kilovolt-amperes $10.00
11 - 756 kilovolt-amperes $40.00
over 76-299 kilovolt -– amperes
Over 299 kilovolt amperes
$60.0080.00
$150.00
Retro fit lighting (ballast & lamps
only; new fixture is per circuit fee)
Each fixturefor the first 10 fixtures $.75 cents10.00
each additional fixture $0.65
Sign Transformer $8.00
Solar PV Systems-The
inspection fee for the
installation is as follows (plan
review fee is $100.00 per hour)
0 watts to and including 5,000
watts
$90.00
5,001 watts to and including 10,000 watts $150.00
10,001 watts to and including 20,000 watts $225.00
20,001 watts to and including 30,000 watts $300.00
30,001 watts to and including 40,000 watts $375.00
40,001 watts and largerto and including 1,000,000
watts
$250.00375.00 & $2540 for each additional 10,000
watts over 40,000 watts
1,000,000 watts to 5,000,000 watts $3975 & $25 for each additional 10,000 watts over
1,000,000 watts
5,000,000 watts and larger $12,975 & $15 for each additional 10,000 watts
over 5,000,000 watts
25
Effective Date: This ordinance shall become effective as of its publication.
First Reading: November 13, 2018
Second Reading: November 27, 2018
Adopted: December 11, 2018
CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE
By:_________________________________
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:_________________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
Publication Date: December 19, 2018
26
2019
Align revenue sources with corresponding costs
Provide transparency as to the basis of rates and
rate adjustments
Maintain a structural balanced operation
Ensure that rates appropriately support the ability to:
o Provide safe drinking water
o Properly discharge of sanitary sewer flows
o Appropriately control and treatment of stormwater runoff
2019
27
2019
Water Fund expenditures are comprised of
two primary operating functions:
Production
$666,871
Distribution
$628,128
The current recommendation includes:
Continuing the phase-in of the a quarterly fee to
support distribution system costs
Quarterly Water Distribution
fee will increase by $3.35
2019
28
The current recommendation includes:
Continue to manage the growth in usage rates to
recognize the revenues provided by the phase in of
the Water distribution fee
The Water usage tier rates
will remain the same as 2018
2019
2019
Per 1000 Gallons
2018
Rates 2019 Rates $ Change
Water Tier I 3.07 3.07 -
Water Tier II 3.24 3.24 -
Water Tier III 3.55 3.55 -
Water Tier IV 4.08 4.08 -
Water Tier V 5.12 5.12 -
Irrigation 4.08 4.08 -
Quarterly flat fee 6.70 10.05 3.35
29
2019
Sewer Fund expenditures are comprised of
two primary operating functions:
Treatment
$784,407
Collection
$477,265
The current recommendation includes:
Continuing the phase-in of the quarterly fee to
support collection system costs
Quarterly Sewer Collection
fee will increase by $3.20
2019
30
The current recommendation includes:
Continue to manage the growth in usage rates to
recognize the revenues provided by the phase in of
the Sewer collection fee
The Sewer usage rate will
remain the same as 2018
2019
2019
Recommended 2019 Sewer Rates:
Per 1000 gallons Rates Rates $ Increase
Sewer Treatment rate 4.62 4.62 0.00
Quarterly flat fee 6.40 9.60 3.20
31
The multi-year approach to Stormwater
rates planned for the quarterly single family
residential charge to increase by thirty-five
cents ($.35).
In 2019 represents a 2.22% increase in rate
The 2.22% rate increase will be applied to all levels of
stormwater charges
2019
The impact of the recommended rates on a residential
customer at each tier level would be as follows:
2019
Tier Level 1st -7,500 2nd -15,000 3rd -22,000 4th -30,000 5th- 37,500
Distribution (1st Qrt. 2018)32%46%17%3%2%
2019 Proposed 93.64 153.10 214.93 280.69 354.26
2018 Actual 86.74 146.20 208.03 273.79 347.36
Quarterly Increase 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90
Annual Increase 27.60 27.60 27.60 27.60 27.60
32
2019
33
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.savmn.com (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that on November 13, 2018, 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, the City
Council will hold a public hearing to solicit public response to the Ordinance Amendments for Sections
§33.015 Sewer Charges to Owner; §33.036 Water Charges to Owner; and §33.090 Charges for storm
water facilities .
Those persons having an interest in said amendments are encouraged to attend. Oral testimony will be
accepted on the above subject at this meeting. Written comments may be taken at the St. Anthony
Village City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony Village, Minnesota 55418 until the date of the
hearing. Questions may be directed to the City Clerk at 612‐782‐3313.
The City Council agenda and packet item relating to this application will be made available prior to the
meeting online at www.savmn.com
Nicole Miller
City Clerk
Publication:
St. Anthony Bulletin
November 7, 2018
34
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
35
MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers, City Manager Mark Casey
From: Breanne Rothstein, AICP, City Planner
Date: City Council meeting on November 13,2018
WSB Project No. 011104‐00
Request: Ordinance to amend certain sections of city code related to decks
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Motion to approve the enclosed ordinance to make changes to the deck provision in the City Code.
CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE REQUEST
Based on an administrative appeal to staff’s interpretation of the regulations applicable to decks, the
Planning Commission directed staff to prepare an ordinance relating to and regulating the setbacks for
decks.
Currently the city code does not have any regulations relating to decks. Up until now, the city staff has
used the principal structure setbacks for attached decks (interpreting “attached” to be within 5 feet of
the home) and the accessory structure setbacks for detached decks.
The enclosed ordinance adds the following language to the city code.
1) A definition of “deck”.
DECK - A platform attached to and projecting from the wall of a building or constructed on top of a building
designed to be used by people as space which is part of the structure. For the purpose of this Zoning Ordinance a
deck is considered “attached” if any part of it is within five (5) feet of an adjacent wall or building. An unattached
platform, or a platform attached to an accessory structure, shall be considered an accessory structure.
2) Add language in “permitted encroachments” relating to decks.
(G) Decks which are not higher than thirty (30) inches above grade at any given point along the grade are
permitted to encroach into the rear yard setback and the side yard setback, as long as a minimum side or rear yard
setback of 5 feet is maintained. This encroachment does not apply in the R-1A Residential Lakeshore District or to
decks higher than thirty (30) inches above grade at any given point along the grade. Such decks must comply with
the setbacks for principal structures.
36
ORDINANCE NO. 2018-01
SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 152.008 DEFINITIONS AND 152.177
PERMITTED ENCROACHMENTS IN YARDS
The City Council of the City of Saint Anthony Village ordains as follows:
Section One. Amendment to the City of Saint Anthony Village City Code to Amend Section
§152.008 Definitions of the City Code of the City of Saint Anthony Village is hereby amended as follows.
The deleted language is represented by strikethrough text. The additional language is represented by single
underlined text.
DECK. A platform attached to and projecting from the wall of a building or constructed on top of a
building designed to be used by people as space which is part of the structure. For the purpose of this
Zoning Ordinance a deck is considered “attached” if any part of it is within five (5) feet of an adjacent
wall or building. An unattached platform, or a platform attached to an accessory structure, shall be
considered an accessory structure.
Section Two. Amendment to the City of Saint Anthony Village City Code to Amend Section
§152.177 Encroachments in Yards of the City Code of the City of Saint Anthony Village is hereby amended
as follows. The deleted language is represented by strikethrough text. The additional language is
represented by single underlined text.
(G) Decks which are not higher than thirty (30) inches above grade at any given point along the grade
are permitted to encroach into the rear yard setback and the side yard setback, as long as a minimum side
or rear yard setback of 5 feet is maintained. This encroachment does not apply in the R-1A Residential
Lakeshore District or to decks higher than thirty (30) inches above grade at any given point along the
grade. Such decks must comply with the setbacks for principal structures.
Section Three. Effective Date. This Ordinance amendment shall be in full force and effect upon
its publication as provided by law.
37
Adopted:
CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE
By:_________________________________
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:_________________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
Publication Date:
38
Deck Ordinance Updates
City Council Meeting
November 13, 2018
Planning Commission Report
o Currently, there are no provisions for decks in City Code
o Staff has been applying the principal structure setback to deck
o An administrative appeal of staff interpretation went to Planning
Commission
o Planning Commission directed staff to prepare provisions for decks
o Planning Commission reviewed the terms and ordinance at the past
two meetings
Background
39
•Definition for deck. Attached (any detached
deck will be considered an accessory
structure) and define “attached”
Ordinance Policy Changes
Ordinance Policy Changes
•Permitted encroachment for a deck into the
rear yard setback allowing a 20 foot
encroachment for decks 30 inches or shorter
(must maintain the same setback (5 feet in R-
1) as accessory structures)
40
Is the platform attached (5 feet or
closer to the home)?
Yes No
It’s a deck!
Is the deck less than 30
inches off the ground?
It’s an accessory structure!
Yes No
Must meet 5 feet rear yard
and side yard setback
Must meet principal
structure setbacks
Must meet 5 feet rear yard
and side yard setback
Planning Commission
Recommendation
Planning Commission held a public hearing in
October and took public comment from one
person (administrative appeal applicant), and
recommended approval of the enclosed
ordinance.
41
Questions?
42
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Meeting Date: November 13, 2018
Resolution- a resolution accepting the 27th Avenue/Pahl Avenue Neighborhood Traffic Study and
Adopting the Traffic Device Installation Policy.
OVERVIEW:
In front of you this evening is a resolution accepting the 27th Avenue/Pahl Avenue Neighborhood Traffic
Study and Adopting the Traffic Device Installation Policy.
At the April 24, 2018 City Council meeting, Council authorized WSB to conduct a traffic study on 27th
Avenue and Pahl Avenue.
On July 16, 2018 a public information meeting was held at City Hall. At the public information meeting, it
was requested to extend the study to include the alley during school hours.
At the October 1, 2018 City Council Work Session, a draft of the study was presented to the City Council,
and subsequently the Council directed staff to bring forward the study to a future City Council meeting,
along with a policy for driver feedback signs installation.
Within the Traffic Device Installation Policy, is our Intersection Control Policy that was previously
approved by the City Council.
New items added to the Traffic Device Installation Policy include: Driver Feedback Sign Installation
Policy, and Speed Limit Determination, which provides information taken from the Minnesota Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD) guidelines.
Attached is the 27th Avenue/Pahl Avenue Traffic Study and Traffic Device Installation Policy.
43
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
44
TRAFFIC STUDY
27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE Area
October 1, 2018 City of St Anthony Village 3301 Silver Lake Road NE St Anthony Village, MN 55418 WSB PROJECT NO. 12064-000
45
27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE Area
Traffic Study
For:
City of St Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
St Anthony Village, MN 55418
October 1, 2018
Prepared By:
WSB & Associates, Inc.
701 Xenia Ave. South, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN, 55416
(763) 541-4800
(763) 541-1700 (Fax)
46
Table of Contents
Certification ................................................................................................................... 1
Introduction / Background ....................................................................................... 2
Public Input .................................................................................................................... 4
Existing Traffic Characteristics ............................................................................... 5
Identified Issues ......................................................................................................... 17
Improvement Opportunities .................................................................................. 19
Issue Analysis/Conclusions .................................................................................... 22
Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 24
Figures / Tables
Figure 1 - Location / Study Area ............................................................................... 3
Figure 2 – Daily Traffic Volumes .............................................................................. 6
Figure 3 – Hourly Traffic Volumes (Weekday) .................................................... 7
Figure 4 – Hourly Traffic Volumes (Weekend) ................................................... 8
Figure 5 – Heavy Vehicle Volumes ........................................................................... 9
Figure 6 – Hourly Pedestrian Volumes (Weekday) ........................................ 12
Figure 7 – Hourly Pedestrian Volumes (Weekend) ........................................ 13
Figure 8 – 85th Percentile Vehicle Speeds .......................................................... 14
Figure 9 – Crash History Location ......................................................................... 15
Figure 10 – Existing Traffic Control ..................................................................... 16
Figure 11 – Recommended Improvements ....................................................... 25
Table 1 – Crash Summary by Year ........................................................................ 11
Table 2 – Crash Summary by Type ....................................................................... 11
Appendix
• Public Information Meeting Material
• ADT and Speed Data Summary by Day
• FHWA Vehicle Classifications
47
Certification I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Charles T. Rickart, P.E. Date: October 1, 2018 Reg. No. 26082
48
Introduction / Background
St. Anthony Village residents within the neighborhood located immediately east of St. Charles Borromeo Church along 27th Avenue NE, Pahl Avenue NE, Roosevelt Street NE, Wilson Street NE and Coolidge Street NE have raised concerns with the speed and volume traffic on these roadways. As a result, the St Anthony Village City Council requested a Traffic Study be prepared to evaluate the existing traffic conditions and recommend possible improvements for the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE area.
To address the residents’ concerns WSB collected necessary traffic volume, pedestrian and speed data, and; identify and evaluate traffic improvements/measures to improve the safety and operation on the area streets. In addition, data from the recently completed Lowery Grove EAW Traffic Study was used to document the traffic conditions on Stinson Boulevard and St. Antony Boulevard. The evaluation process focused on determining if and where traffic issues exist and if they could be improved or eliminated by the application of alternative traffic improvements. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD); Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Design and Traffic Engineering Manuals; and traffic engineering standard practices and principal were used as the basis for the evaluation process. The steps in the process included: 1. Documenting that a problem exists such as excessive traffic volumes and/or speeds or vehicle crashes 2. Determine the frequency or recurring nature of the problem and that it is not a random or isolated event. 3. Identifying potential measures that would improve or eliminate the problem. This includes intersection controls and/or addressing other conditions at the problem locations. Any recommendations for changes in the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE area have been developed keeping the following goals in mind:
• Improvement to vehicle and pedestrian safety.
• Application of least restrictive control type possible.
• Traffic control consistency within the area.
• Would not promote cut-through or diversion of traffic to other streets in the area.
• Would not promote speeding on streets within the area. The 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE area for the purposes of this study is bounded by St Anthony Boulevard on the north, 27th Avenue on the south, Stinson Parkway on the west and Kenzie Terrace on the east. The Project Location is shown in Figure 1. The following sections of this report document the existing traffic data collected, analysis of the data, improvement alternatives and recommended improvements.
49
50
Public Input Public input is a critical element in the identification of issues and concerns in the area. For the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE Traffic Study a public information meeting was held on July 16, 2018 at the St Anthony Village City Hall. There were 17 residents that signed in at the meeting. The primary purpose of the open house was to update the residents on the data collection, discuss the identified issues and concerns, outline the potential opportunities and, to receive input on the issues and concerns. The primary comments received include:
• Need for pedestrian / school zone improvements
• Need for blinker signs in the corridor
• Need for additional traffic counts on Roosevelt Street
• Concern with the posted speed limit
• Concern with traffic rolling through stop signs Copies of the meeting notice, sign-in sheets and presentation materials is included in the
Appendix. Also included are all comment cards received at the Open House meet, comment cards mailed to the City and phone/email comments received.
51
Existing Traffic Characteristics
In order to evaluate the current safety and operational conditions in the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE area, the existing traffic characteristics were collected. This included:
• Traffic volumes (hourly and daily)
• Heavy vehicle volumes
• Pedestrian volumes
• Crash history
• Vehicle speeds
• Current traffic control (signing, pavement markings, sidewalks, etc.).
Traffic Volumes Hourly turning movement and daily traffic volumes were collected over a two-week period from May 18, 2018 to May 31, 2018 for most of the area roadway system. Based on comments at the public information meeting additional traffic counts were collected over a one-week period from September 5, 2018 to September 11th, 2018. In both cases the counts were conducted when school was in session to assure a worst-case condition. In general, the counts show that the volumes in the area are at those of typical residential neighborhood streets. Typical residential streets will have traffic volumes between 500 and 1000 vehicles per day(vpd). The ADT volumes on the streets in the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE area range from less than 100 to 750vpd
Figure 2 shows the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes for an average weekday, average Saturday and average Sunday in area. Included in the Appendix is a table showing a summary of the ADT traffic volumes per day.
Figure 3 shows the hourly traffic volumes on an average weekday for the AM peak hour (7:15am-8:15am), PM peak hour (4:30pm-5:30pm) and school peak hour (3:15pm – 4:15pm). Figure 4 the hourly traffic volumes on an average Saturday peak hour and average Sunday peak hour.
Heavy Vehicle Volumes Heavy vehicle traffic volumes were collected in conjunction with the average daily traffic counts. The vehicle classification was based on the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) standard vehicle splits. The standard FHWA Vehicle Classification table is included in the Appendix. Figure 5 shows the percent vehicles, percent single unit trucks / buses and percent of heavy trucks. Typical residential streets will have heavy vehicle traffic ranging from 2% to 5%. The percent heavy vehicles in the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE area range from 0 to 4.7%.
52
53
54
55
56
Pedestrian Volumes Pedestrian volumes were collected with the hourly turning movement counts conducted at the intersections in the study area. The data indicates that the pedestrian volumes are slightly higher during the afternoon school peak hour time. The heaviest volumes were recorded: along Roosevelt Street adjacent to the school; at the Stinson Parkway crossing at 27th Avenue NE, and; at the Roosevelt Street crossing at St Anthony Boulevard.
Figure 6 shows the hourly pedestrian volumes on an average weekday for the AM peak hour (7:15am-8:15am), PM peak hour (4:30pm-5:30pm) and school peak hour (3:15pm – 4:15pm). Figure 7 shows the hourly traffic volumes on an average Saturday peak hour and average Sunday peak hour.
Vehicle Speeds In conjunction with the daily traffic counts, vehicle speeds were also collected. Vehicle speed data is typically given as the 85% speed. The 85% speed represents the speed at which 85% percent of the counted vehicles are traveling at or below. Research indicates that this value is where most drivers will operate their vehicle in a reasonable manor. The posted speed limit on the area roadways is 30 mph which is the typical speed limit on most residential streets. The data indicates that most streets in the study area have vehicles that are traveling at or below the posted speed. The 85% speed ranges from 25.0mph to 32.4mph. Figure 8 shows the average 85% vehicle speed for the average weekday and weekend on the streets within the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE area. Included in the Appendix is a table showing a summary of the vehicle speeds per day.
Crash History Using the State of Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (CMAT), crash data from the past 5 years (2011-2015) was documented. The data shows that over the past five years five locations have had at least one crash. The locations that have had more than one crash are at the intersections outside the study area including: Stinson Parkway at 27th Avenue NE; St Anthony Boulevard at Wilson Street, and; Kenzie Terrace at 27th Avenue NE. NE. Of the crashes reported the majority have been either rear-end or sideswipe type crashes.
Figure 9 shows the location of the crashes from 2011-2015 in the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE area. Table 1 show the crash data by year for each location. Table 2 shows the type of crash by location.
57
Table 1: Crash Summary by Year
Location
Crashes
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
Crashes PD PI PD PI PD PI PD PI PD PI Stinson Parkway at 27th Ave NE 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 27th Ave NE at Roosevelt St 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Wilson St at Pahl Ave NE 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 St Anthony Blvd at Wilson St 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Kenzie Terrace at 27th Ave NE 1 0 1 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 7 PD = Property Damage PI = Personal Injury
Table 2: Crash Summary by Type
Location
Type Total
Crashes Sideswipe Right
Turn
Rear
End
Right
Angle Unknown Stinson Parkway at 27th Ave NE 0 1 2 0 0 3 27th Ave NE at Roosevelt St 1 0 0 0 0 1 Wilson St at Pahl Ave NE 1 0 0 0 0 1 St Anthony Blvd at Wilson St 1 0 0 0 1 2 Kenzie Terrace at 27th Ave NE 1 0 3 2 1 7
Existing Conditions/Traffic Control Devices The existing traffic control was documented within the study area. This included location of; warning signs, stop signs, speed limit signs, no-parking signs and pedestrian crosswalks.
Figure 10 shows the existing conditions in the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE study area.
58
59
60
61
62
63
Identified Issues Issues were identified based on two primary sources including neighborhood input and the data collected. The issues and concerns identified include: 1. Vehicle traffic volumes 2. Speeding 3. Cut-through traffic 4. Pedestrian and bicycle traffic / circulation 5. School traffic 6. Adjacent development
Based on the data collected three primary issues were reviewed including, safety, speed and cut-through traffic. In order to determine the magnitude of the issues and the level of improvements needed, screening criteria was developed and discussed below.
Safety The safety of an intersection or roadway segment is defined by the number, frequency and type of crashes at a location. An intersection or roadway segment is not considered to have a safety issue if there have only been one or two crashes during any multiyear analysis period. However, if there have been more than three crashes the following criteria should be used to trigger further study of an intersection or roadway segment.
• One (1) crash per year for three or more years, or
• More than three (3) crashes in one year. Based on these criteria the only location in the study area that was identified for additional study is the intersection of Kenzie Terrace at 27th Avenue NE with 7 reported crashes. All other intersections or roadway segments had three crashes or less in the 5-year period.
Speed The 85% speed is used as the primary measure of the speed on a segment of street. If the 85% speed is greater than the posted (30mph) speed limit, then the street segment should be further studied. Based on this criterion the only roadway segment that had a 85% speed over 30mph was 27th Avenue NE between Roosevelt Street and Wilson Street at 32.4mph.
Cut-Through Traffic The potential for cut-through traffic was evaluated for the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE area. The study area is fairly captive with a limited number of street accesses in and out. Based on a review of the area there are approximately 92 homes in the study area that could use the area streets to St Anthony Boulevard, Stinson Parkway or Kenzie Terrace.
64
By using standard Institute of Transportation (ITE) trip generation factors for residential homes the number of estimated daily trips that could use the area roadway was determined to be approximately 920 vehicles per day (vpd). Comparing this the existing traffic count on the adjacent streets in and out of the area, it can be concluded that the level of traffic entering or exiting the area does not indicate a cut-through issue. However, reviewing the hourly peak hour turning movement counts there appears to be two routes that may be experiencing some cut-through traffic. The first route is between St Anthony Boulevard and Kenzie Terrace using Coolidge Street to 27th Avenue NE. The second is between St Anthony Boulevard and Stinson Parkway using Wilson Street to 27th Avenue.
65
Improvement Opportunities For each of the identified issues there are several low cost, low impact improvement opportunities that could be implemented depending on further analysis of the conditions and data. Discussed below are some of the possible improvement opportunities and the criteria for implementations.
Vehicle Safety Improvements Safety improvements include items that could provide potential benefits by reducing the number of crashes. These improvements would include:
1. Removing obstructions – When the analysis indicates that a sight line issue is present at an intersection; where possible the sight line triangle should be cleared of obstructions. Based on a typical 25mph/30 mph city street the sight triangle is a distance between 30’ and 50’ (depending on right of way width) measured along the right of way line at the intersection. This distance should be based on calculations from the AASHTO “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets” Green Book. If clearing the obstruction is not possible, further consideration to other intersection control should be explored.
2. Advance warning signs – Advance warning signs could include “Stop Ahead”, “Intersection Ahead”, etc. These signs would be installed where intersection control is typically in place and/or crashes indicate that sight lines to the intersection may be an issue.
3. “Blinker” signs – Blinker signs are typically used where vehicles need additional warning or in extreme cases with limited sight distance and higher traffic volumes. They can be used on either warning signs (advanced signs) or regulatory signs (stop or yield signs).
4. Pavement markings – This could include either center line or edge line markings. They would typically be used where crashes indicate issues with vehicles staying in their own lane.
5. Lighting – Intersection lighting could be used to clearly locate an intersection at night. Typically, lighting could be installed where there are a significant number of crashes occurring at night.
66
6. Yield signs – Yield signs are typically used in locations where there is confusion on which vehicle approaching the intersection has the right of way. These signs can be used to help clearly assign the right-of-way at an intersection with a balanced traffic flow on all approaches.
7. Stop signs – The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices outlines warrants for the installation of stop signs. These warrants include criteria for installation of both all-way or 2-way stops. In addition, stop signs could be considered where sight distance cannot be improved.
8. Turn Lanes/By-Pass Lanes – The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Road Design Manual and Local Road Research Board have established criteria for the addition of turn lanes or by-pass lanes based on traffic volumes and crash data. Specifically, the number of turning vehicles vs opposing vehicles and/or rear-end type crashes.
Speed Reduction Improvements Speed improvements include items that would provide potential benefits by reducing speeding in the neighborhood. These improvements could include:
1. Speed limit signs – In locations where the ADT volume is over 750 vehicles per day and there is currently not a posted speed limit sign and the 85% speed is over the posted speed limit, consideration should be given to installing speed limit signs.
2. Driver feed-back (dynamic) speed signs – Driver feed-back signs are signs that display the actual speed of a vehicle as it drives by the location. On neighborhood streets where the 85% speed is determined to be greater than 3mph above the posted speed limit, a driver feed-back sign could be used to warn the driver that they are speeding.
3. Additional enforcement – Based on the traffic speed data collected if the 85% speed is up to 3mph over the posted speed limit, consideration should be given to requesting additional police enforcement.
Pedestrian Safety Improvements Pedestrian safety improvements include items that would provide potential benefits by reducing conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians or increasing awareness of pedestrians in the neighborhood. These improvements could include:
67
1. School Speed Zone Signing – The City may establish school speed limits within a school zone of public or non-public school on a basis of engineering and traffic investigations based on the following parameters: The school speed zone shall only be in effect when children are present going to or leaving the school; school speed zones cannot lower the posted speed zone more than 30 mph and shall not be established below 15 mph; school zones are defined as a segment of street or highway that abuts school grounds where children have access to the roadway or where a school crossing is in place; school speed zone signing and stripping must be in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD), and; any traffic violations of a school speed limit are subject to a double fine.
2. Pedestrian-activated Flashing LEDs in the Border of a
Warning Sign - Section 2A.07 in the MnMUTCD describes the use of flashing white or yellow LEDs in the border of a pedestrian crossing warning sign. The flashing LEDs may be pedestrian activated to increase their effectiveness in making the crossing sign more conspicuous when pedestrians desire to cross the roadway.
3. Signed and Marked Crosswalks – Signed and
marked pedestrian crosswalks may be used to
delineate preferred pedestrian paths across
roadways under the following conditions: at
locations with stop signs or traffic signals to direct
pedestrians to those crossing locations and to
prevent vehicular traffic from blocking the
pedestrian path when stopping for a stop sign or
red light; at non-signalized street crossing locations
in designated school zones, or; at non-signalized locations where engineering judgment
dictates that the number of motor vehicle lanes, pedestrian exposure, average daily traffic
(ADT), posted speed limit, and geometry of the location would make the use of specially
designated crosswalks desirable for traffic/pedestrian safety and mobility.
4. Sidewalk / Path Construction – In areas where pedestrian volumes and vehicle volumes are at a level where safety of the pedestrian is jeopardized, construction of a separated sidewalk or path can be considered. Sidewalks or paths provide many benefits including safety, mobility, and healthier communities. In addition to reducing walking along roadway crashes, sidewalks reduce other pedestrian crashes. Providing walkways for pedestrians dramatically increases how well pedestrians perceive their needs are being met along roadways.
68
Issue Analysis/Conclusions Based on the identified issues and the criteria discussed above for each improvement opportunity, the following analysis conclusions were made:
• Safety Issues: As indicated, the only location that was identified with safety (crash) issues is the intersection of Kenzie Terrace at 27th Avenue NE. The majority of the crashes are northbound or southbound on Kenzie Terrace. There are no other trends with the crashes such as time of day or day or week or time of year. Based on the number of vehicles on Kenzie Terrace and with the type and number of crashes a request should be made to Hennepin County to consider a safety improvements at the intersection.
• Speeding Issues: As indicated by the neighborhood concerns and verified with the collected data, the speed of traffic on 27th Avenue between Roosevelt Street and Wilson Street has an 85% speed over the posted 30mph limit. Based on the traffic volume review it was documented that most of the traffic on these streets is local to the neighborhood. These should be people that know the area and what the speed limit and road conditions are. Based on the review of the alternatives available there are two improvements that could be considered. 1. Additional Enforcement – With the majority of the streets in the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE area having an 85% speed below the posted 30mph speed limit, and; with the majority of the traffic being local to the area, and; with the recommended installation of the School Speed Zone (see below); additional enforcement should be implemented. The streets should continue to be monitored and evaluated to determine if the speed limit is reduced. 2. Driver Feed-Back (DFB) Signs – Should the 85% speed not be reduced with the additional enforcement. DFB signs could be considered. Research has shown that installation of DFB signs can reduce the 85th speed by up to 3mph. This would reduce the 85% speed on 27th Avenue NE to below the posted speed limit. If this alternative is implemented, a temporary DFB should be installed as a test to determine if the installation provides the benefit anticipated.
• Pedestrian Safety: Based on the pedestrian and vehicle data collected consideration should be given to providing accommodation and/or awareness of pedestrians, especially adjacent to the St. Charles Borromeo Church and School.
There are two primary options for improving the safety for pedestrian traffic in the area.
69
1. School Speed Zone Establishment – Based on the State requirements and the
MnMUTCD the City can establish a school speed zone adjacent to the St. Charles
Borromeo School on 27th Avenue NE between Stinson Parkway and Roosevelt
Street. Based on the traffic volumes and speeds a 20mph school speed zone is
recommended as a solution to improve safety of the students and pedestrians
adjacent to 27th Avenue NE.
2. Construction of a Sidewalk Connection – Currently there is sidewalk connections in the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE area located: on the north side of 27th Avenue NE between Stinson Parkway and Roosevelt Street adjacent to the St Charles Borromeo Church and School; on both sides of Stinson Parkway between 27th Avenue NE and St Anthony Boulevard adjacent to St Charles Borromeo Church and School; on both sides of St Anthony Boulevard between Stinson Parkway and Kenzie Terrace. Based on pedestrian data collected and standard practices construction of sidewalk connections could be considered in the area. This would need to be requested by the adjacent land owners.
• Cut-Through Traffic: As discussed in the issues identification section most of the traffic in the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE area is local from the neighborhood. However, based on a review of the traffic volume data there appears to be to two possible cut-through routes. 1. Between St Anthony Boulevard and Kenzie Terrace using Coolidge Street to 27th Avenue NE. – The traffic using this cut-through route appears to be trying to avoid the traffic signal at St Anthony Boulevard and Kenzie Terrace. In order to discourage this cut-through route it will require making it less desirable. An option to address this issue would be to install “Stop” signs on Coolidge Street at the Pahl Avenue NE intersection making it an all-way stop consistent with the adjacent intersection. 2. Between St Anthony Boulevard and Stinson Parkway using Wilson Street to 27th Avenue – The traffic using this route appears to be avoiding the intersection of St. Anthony Boulevard and Stinson Parkway. It is unclear if this traffic is actually cutting through or destined for St Charles Borromeo Church and School. One of the concerns is with this traffic using the alleys between Wilson Street and Roosevelt Street. An option to address this issue would be to install “No Thru Traffic” signs on both ends of the two alleys between Wilson Street and Roosevelt Street.
Concern has also been raised that as the adjacent area continues to develop, traffic will used 27th Avenue NE as a cut-through. Based on the Traffic Study completed for the Lowry Grove project the majority of the traffic (approximately 85%) is entering and exiting the area from the south and west. The remining traffic will access the Lowry Grove site from Stinson Parkway or Kenzie Terrace. There is no advantage for traffic to cut-through on 27th Avenue to access the Lowry Grove site.
70
Recommendations Based on the issues analysis and the analysis conclusions, the following low impact, low cost improvements are recommended for the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE area.
Figure 11 shows the location for the proposed improvements.
Safety Improvements
• Continue working with Hennepin County on the future improvements at Kenzie Terrace and 27th Avenue NE.
Speed Improvements
• Provide additional speed enforcement in the area.
• Develop a policy for the use of and possible installation of driver feed-back signs in the City.
Pedestrian Improvements
• Develop City policy for the location of a School Speed Zone (20mph). This may be applied to 27th Avenue NE and Stinson Boulevard.
• Changes to Stinson Boulevard will require approval from the Minneapolis Park Board.
Cut-Through Traffic
• Review additional signage on northbound and southbound Coolidge Street at Pahl Avenue NE.
• Consider “No Thru Traffic” signs on both ends of the alleys between Wilson Street and Roosevelt Street.
• Continue to monitor the traffic in the 27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE area as the adjacent development continues.
71
72
APPENDIX
73
27th Avenue NE / Pahl Avenue NE Area Traffic Study
Public Information Meeting
July 16th, 2018
6:00 PM to 7:00 PM
The City of St Anthony Village has initiated a Traffic Study for the neighborhood located
immediately east of St. Charles Borromeo Church along 27th Avenue NE, Pahl Avenue NE,
Roosevelt Street NE, Wilson Street NE and Coolidge Street NE. The map below shows the
project study area. The study is being prepared to address residents’ concerns with traffic and
pedestrian safety related to the speed and volume of traffic on these roadways.
The traffic data has now been collected and tabulated and the initial review has been completed.
In order to prepare the draft study, the City wishes to get public input. A Public Information
Meeting is scheduled for July 16th, 2018. The meeting will be held at the St. Anthony Village
Hall beginning at 6:00 pm with a short presentation beginning at 6:15 pm.
The purpose of the meeting will be to review the traffic data collected, discuss the traffic calming
and safety improvement options and to receive input from adjacent property owners on their
issues and concerns. Following the meeting a final report will be prepared with final conclusions
and recommendations.
If you are unable to attend the Public Information meeting and are in interested in providing
input please contact the City’s consultant engineer Chuck Rickart at (612) 360-1283 or
crickart@wsbeng.com.
74
9/19/2018
1
Public Information Meeting
July 16, 2018
6:00 PM
27th Avenue NE/Pahl Avenue Area NE
Traffic Study
Study Location Map
75
9/19/2018
2
•Review Study Purpose, Objectives and Process
•Discus data collection
•Discuss identified neighborhood traffic issues and concerns
•Discuss alternative solutions
•Receive public input on issues and solutions
Purpose of the Meeting
•Improve vehicle and pedestrian safety
•Apply least restrictive control type possible
•Traffic control consistency
•Not to promote cut-through traffic or diversion of traffic
•Not to promote speeding
Study Objectives
76
9/19/2018
3
•Identify neighborhood issues:
1. Traffic operations (signing, pavement markings, pedestrians,
sight distance, etc.)
2. Speeding
3. Cut-through traffic
•Determine potential low impact, low cost improvements
Study Purpose
•Collect existing data –Completed
•Gather neighborhood input –Tonight
•Collect additional data if needed
•Conduct preliminary analysis
•Present findings to City Council
•Prepare final report and recommendations
•Present findings to neighborhood for additional input
Study Process
77
9/19/2018
4
•Existing Traffic Control / Signing
•Traffic Volumes
1. Weekday hourly peak hours (AM, PM, School)
2. Weekend hourly peak hours (Saturday, Sunday)
3. Daily
•Pedestrian Volumes
•Speed
•Vehicle Classification (Heavy Vehicles)
Data Collection
Traffic Control / Signing
78
9/19/2018
5
Hourly Traffic Volumes –Weekday
Hourly Traffic Volume - Weekend
79
9/19/2018
6
Daily Traffic Volumes
Hourly Pedestrian Volumes - Weekday
80
9/19/2018
7
Hourly Pedestrian Volumes - Weekend
85% Speed
81
9/19/2018
8
Vehicle Classification
•Vehicle traffic volumes
•Speeding
•Cut-through traffic
•Pedestrian and bicycle traffic / Circulation
•School traffic
•Adjacent development
Identified Issues
82
9/19/2018
9
•Traffic is Local to the Neighborhood
–Typical residential street 500 –1000vpd
–Volumes range from 110 to 750vpd
•Heavy vehicles
–Typical residential street 2%-5% trucks
–% trucks range from 0% to 4.7%
Issues Review –Traffic Volumes
•Guideline - 85% Speed
•Typical speed limit on neighborhood streets is 30mph
•Existing 85% speed ranges from 25.0 to 32.4
Issues Review –Speed
83
9/19/2018
10
•Study Area captive with limited number of streets
•Standard ITE Traffic Generation rate of approximately 10 trips/day
•Approximately 92 homes in area or 920 trips from the residential
area
•Travel time with stop signs
•Traffic volumes show possible cut through
–Wilson St/27th St
–Coolidge St/Pahl Ave
Issues Review –Cut Through Traffic
•Traffic control changes
•Revised / additional signing
•Revised pavement markings
•Technology (driver feedback signs, blinker signs, etc.)
Possible Low Cost/Low Impact Examples
84
9/19/2018
11
•Collect additional data, conduct analysis, prepare preliminary
findings
•Final report
•City Council meeting
•Neighborhood meeting #2
•Implement approved recommendation (based on funding
availability)
Next Steps
Jay Hartman –City of St Anthony
612-782-3314
jhartman@savmn.com
Charles Rickart –WSB & Associates
612-360-1283
crickart@wsbeng.com
Contacts/Additional Information
85
9/19/2018
12
Questions / Comments
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
ALL CARS CARS
CARS W/ 1-AXLE TRAILER
CARS W/ 2-AXLE TRAILER
2
3
4
2
MOTORCYCLES 21
NO. OF AXLESDESCRIPTION
Figure 1
CLASS
GROUP
FHWA VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION
PICK-UPS & VANS
1 & 2 AXLE TRAILERS
2, 3, & 43
BUSES 2&34
2-AXLE, SINGLE UNIT
25
3-AXLE, SINGLE UNIT
36
4-AXLE, SINGLE UNIT
47
2-AXLE, TRACTOR,
1-AXLE TRAILER (2&1)
3
8 2-AXLE, TRACTOR,
2-AXLE TRAILER (2&2)
4
3-AXLE, TRACTOR,
2-AXLE TRAILER (3&2)
5
9
3-AXLE, TRACTOR,
1-AXLE TRAILER (3&1)
4
TRACTOR W/ SINGLE TRAILER
6&710
5-AXLE MULTI-TRAILER
511
6-AXLE MULTI-TRAILER
612
13
14
15
7 or moreANY 7 OR MORE AXLE
NOT USED
UNKNOWN VEHICLE TYPE
3-AXLE, TRUCK
W/ 2-AXLE TRAILER
5
HEAVY TRUCKS
95
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
96
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
TRAFFIC DEVICE INSTALLATION POLICY
INTERSECTION CONTROL POLICY
PURPOSE
This document outlines policies for determining the location and type of intersection control signage on
roadways owned and maintained by the City of St. Anthony Village. The City of St. Anthony Village is
implementing this policy for several reasons:
Effective traffic control is achieved by exercising the least intrusive control to achieve safe traffic
flow. When excessive control or unnecessary control is used, motorists feel imposed upon and
frequently will ignore the traffic control device. This can lead to severe consequences involving
collisions and possibly personal injury.
Consistent application of intersection control devices increases safety to both motorists and
pedestrians within the community.
Research conducted by the Federal Highway Administration shows that adding stop signs are not
effective in addressing the issue of speed. The purpose of stop signs is to assign right‐of‐way at an
intersection, not to control speeding.
The Federal Highway Administration also concluded that adding stop signs do not necessarily
improve safety at an intersection.
A common misconception is that stop signs at an intersection are needed because an accident has
occurred there recently. It is important to keep in mind that accidents are random events. Many
collisions are the result of driver error and are not the fault of poor design or insufficient traffic
control.
Public understanding of the function of stop signs is one of the most critical elements in reducing
speeding and traffic accidents.
A consistent application of the policy serves both the motorist and resident within the City. Stop signs
can be an effective safety measure if properly warranted. However, they should not be installed
inappropriately where they may be ignored by drivers, needlessly interrupt traffic flow, and negatively
affect fuel consumption, the environment, or cause needless noise.
The traffic control at an intersection is critical to the operation of both intersecting roadways. If
incorrect traffic control is installed for the existing traffic conditions and topographic characteristics of
the intersection, undue delays and even unnecessary accidents could occur. The traveling public,
especially persons not familiar with the area, typically drive based on instinct. Drivers subconsciously
evaluate their surroundings to determine if a stop sign should or should not be located on an
intersection approach.
97
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
PROCESS
City staff will formalize the traffic safety concern or request. City staff will assist concerned residents to
complete a “Traffic Study Request Form” (appendix A) and gather the pertinent facts to help clearly
define the problem and seek a possible solution. Traffic Study Request forms will be reviewed by the
City Manager (or designee), Public Works Director, Police Chief and City Engineer. City staff will
complete an “Intersection Control Justification Worksheet” (Appendix C) and share the results with all
interested parties. If a disagreement with the decision or additional information and/or facts that are
persuasive as related to the City warrants/policies for the requested sign, interested parties may appear
at a City Council meeting and present viewpoint. Any subsequent review of the same or similar request
is at the discretion of the City Council.
The City Council is the final authority on traffic safety matters, in all cases of traffic control changes to
intersections under City of St. Anthony Village jurisdiction, approval by resolution by Council shall be
required. Requests for removal of a sign will follow the same process.
POLICY
The following information explains St. Anthony Village’s policies on intersection traffic control and the
correct use of stop signs.
LOCAL STREET “RESIDENTIAL” STOP SIGNS
The purpose of the local street stop sign policy is to provide fair and uniform treatment of all
requests for stop signs in residential areas.
1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be
followed. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight obstructions shall be reviewed
when considering the installation of a stop sign. The following MUTCD standards will be applied:
a. If an intersection experiences five (5) or more right angle accidents in a three (3) year
period, stop signs should be considered.
b. If the presence of a sight obstruction is contributing to accidents at an intersection, removal
of the sight obstruction should be sought before considering a stop sign.
c. If the 85th percentile speed on any leg of an intersection is more than five (5) MPH over the
posted speed limit, a stop sign should be considered for the intersecting street.
d. If traffic volumes exceed 500 vehicles per day on each of the intersecting streets, stop signs
should be considered.
2. Absent traffic data which clearly indicates the need for a stop sign, a residential intersection
should be left uncontrolled.
3. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed.
4. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume.
5. Residential stop sign appropriateness will be reviewed as part of any street reconstruction.
98
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
COLLECTOR STREET STOP SIGNS
The purpose of the collector street stop sign policy is to provide fair and uniform treatment of all
requests for multiway, all way, and 4‐way stop signs.
1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be
followed. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight obstructions shall be reviewed by
City Staff when considering the installation of a stop sign.
2. Any of the following conditions may warrant a multiway stop sign installation:
a. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents in a 12‐month period
of a type susceptible to correction by a multiway stop installation. Such accidents include
right‐ and left‐turn collisions as well as right angle collisions.
b. Minimum traffic volumes:
1) The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average
at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and
2) The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must
average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor
street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hours, but
3) When the 85‐percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per
hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements.
3. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed.
4. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume.
5. Absent traffic data, which clearly indicates the need for a multiway stop sign, control devices at
an intersection will remain unchanged.
6. Multiway stop sign appropriateness will be reviewed as part of any street reconstruction.
99
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
DRIVER FEEDBACK SIGN INSTALLATION POLICY
PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy is to outline the processes and procedures for installing Driver Feedback (DFB)
signs as a traffic calming device. The City of St. Anthony Village is implementing this policy for several
reasons:
Currently local City streets in the City of St. Anthony Village have a speed limit of 30 mph. On some
of these streets the speed of traffic is a concern that maybe actual or perceived.
Driver feedback signs are traffic calming devices designed to slow speeders down by alerting them
of their speed. They are designed to increase driver speed awareness and roadway safety in
residential communities, schools, hospital zones, business parks, highway and road construction
sites, police enforcement zones or just about anywhere speeding is a problem.
Vehicle speeds on local City streets are determined based upon guidelines from Minnesota Statutes,
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) policies and Minnesota Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD) (see Appendix B).
DFB signs display the speed of approaching vehicles, making speeding drivers aware that they are
exceeding the speed limit.
DFB signs may be used to address excessive mean speed and 85th percentile speed issues. Studies
have shown that: speeders will slow down up to 80% of the time when alerted by a radar sign;
typical speed reductions are from 10‐20%, and; overall compliance with the posted speed limit will
go up by 30‐60%.
PROCESS
City staff will have primary responsibility for determining the need for installation of DFB’s on St
Anthony Village city streets. City staff will assist concerned residents to complete a “Traffic Study
Request Form” (Appendix A) and gather the pertinent facts to help clearly define the problem and seek
a possible solution. Traffic Study Request forms will be reviewed by the City Manager (or designee),
Public Works Director, Police Chief and City Engineer.
It is the policy of the City of St Anthony Village to follow the guidelines and recommendations contained
in the most current approved Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD) to
make decisions on design, locations, installation and maintenance of signs, pavement markings and
traffic calming devices. Minnesota State Statute 169.06, Sub. 3 states, "All traffic control devices
erected shall conform to the state manual and specifications." (Appendix B)
Following a determination that the street segment meets the eligibility guidelines; City staff will
complete a Driver Feedback sign justification and share the results with all interested parties. If a
disagreement with the decision or additional information and/or facts that are persuasive as related to
the City warrants/policies for the requested installation, interested parties may appear at a City Council
meeting and present viewpoint. Any subsequent review of the same or similar request is at the
discretion of the City Council.
100
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
The City Engineer or designee is responsible for coordinating with other agencies (park board, state and
county) when a traffic evaluation request is received regarding a park board, state or county roadway
within the city limits.
The City Council is the final authority on traffic safety matters, in all cases of traffic changes to streets
under City of St. Anthony Village jurisdiction, approval by resolution by Council shall be required.
Requests for removal of a sign will follow the same process.
EVALUATION
If a speed concern is identified where a Driver Feedback (DFB) sign is an appropriate solution, the
following guidelines should be followed:
Step 1 ‐ Eligibility:
In order for a roadway to be eligible for consideration of a DFB, it needs to meet the following minimum
criteria.
Classified as a local or collector street
Length greater than 1,000 feet
Traffic volumes greater than 1,000 vehicles per day
Posted speed of 30 mph
Cannot be a cul‐de‐sac
Step 2 ‐ Data Collection:
For eligible roadway segments, available data should be collected including:
Average Daily Traffic Volume
Crash History
Pedestrian Traffic Volumes (if applicable)
Vehicle Speeds
Site Topography
Step 3 ‐ Evaluation Process:
If the roadway is eligible for consideration for a DFB sign, a study will be conducted using the collected
data. In analyzing the speed data, the 85th percentile speed and Pace of the traffic of the collected data
will be calculated. Pace and 85th Percentile speed are defined as follows:
Pace – The 10 MPH range of speeds containing the largest number of observations
85th Percentile Speed – The speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving.
Typically, the 85th Percentile Speed is within two miles per hour of the upper limit of the Pace. A normal
speed distribution will contain approximately 70% of the sample within the Pace with 15% above and
15% below.
101
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
Based on the data collected for streets with a posted speed limit of 30 mph the following criteria will be
used to determine if a DFB sign or other mitigations should be considered:
1. 85% Speed less than 30 mph with less than 15% over the Pace:
No further action required
2. 85% Speed between 30 mph and 33 mph with less than 15% over the Pace:
Continue to monitor location
Additional enforcement
3. 85% Speed between 33 mph and 35 mph with more than 15% over the Pace:
Installation of Driver Feedback Signs
4. 85% Speed is greater than 35 mph with more than 15% over the Pace:
Installation of Driver Feedback Signs
Consider evaluation for potential engineering solutions.
Step 4 – Implementation/Funding:
Upon the recommendation of City staff and approval by the City Council, the appropriate measures will
be implemented by the City once funding is secured. Possible funding sources include:
Inclusion in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Special request from the City Council
Assessment process
Figure 1 represents the decision diagram used in the speed concern evaluation process.
102
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
Figure 1 – Driver Feedback Sign Evaluation Process
Request Received
Staff Evaluation
(Data collection and evaluation)
85th
Percentile
Speed > 33
mph
Council to consider
Driver Feedback Signs
Council to consider
potential engineering
solutions
Additional Speed Enforcement
if perceived speed concern
is still present
(No further action by City Council)
NO
Roadway
Eligible
NO
YES
No further action
YES
Feasibility, Funding, and Installation
85th
Percentile
Speed > 35
mph
NO YES
103
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
Appendix A
104
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
Traffic Study Request Form
Date:__________________
Requested by (Name, Address, & Phone Number):
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Description of the Problem:
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Time of Day Problem Occurs:
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Requested Action of the City:
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Sketch intersection of roadway segment showing where the problem occurs:
Return form to City Hall
3301 Silver Lake Rd NE
St. Anthony, MN 55418
105
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
Appendix B
106
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
SPEED LIMIT DETERMINATION
The City of St Anthony Village will address speed limit related concerns based upon guidelines
from Minnesota Statutes, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) policies,
Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD), and engineering
judgement.
The basis for setting a speed limit follows the Minnesota State Statutes and the MnMUTCD. The
following segments of information were taken from the Minnesota Statutes and MnMUTCD,
those of which apply to the City of St Anthony Village. A exert from the FHWA discussing best
practices is also included showing how engineering studies are used to set new speed limits or
change existing ones.
Minnesota Statues:
169.011 DEFINITIONS
Subdivision 64. Residential Roadway
A “residential roadway” is a city street or town road whose length is up to a half‐mile.
169.14 SPEED LIMITS, ZONES; RADAR.
Subdivision 1. Duty to drive with due care.
No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent
under the conditions. Every driver is responsible for becoming and remaining aware of the
actual and potential hazards then existing on the highway and must use due care in operating a
vehicle.
In every event speed shall be so restricted as may be necessary to avoid colliding with any
person, vehicle or other conveyance on or entering the highway in compliance with legal
requirements and the duty of all persons to use due care.
Subdivision 2. Speed limits.
(a) Where no special hazard exists the following speeds shall be lawful, but any speeds in excess
of such limits shall be prima facie evidence that the speed is not reasonable or prudent and that
it is unlawful; except that the speed limit within any municipality shall be a maximum limit and
any speed in excess thereof shall be unlawful:
(1) 30 miles per hour in an urban district;
(Subdivisions 2.2‐2.7 do not apply here, therefore were excluded)
(8) 35 miles per hour in a rural residential district if adopted by the road authority
having jurisdiction over the rural residential district.
(c) A speed limit adopted under paragraph (a), clause (8), is not effective unless the road
authority has erected signs designating the speed limit and indicating the beginning and end of
the rural residential district for the roadway on which the speed limit applies.
107
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
MnMUTCD:
2B.13 Speed Limit Sign
A Standard: Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the
basis of an engineering study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering
practices.
The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free‐flowing
vehicles.
The speed limit (R2‐1) sign shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as
adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study. The speed limits displayed
shall be in multiples of 5 mph. Speed Limit signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is
required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another.
An Option: Other factors that may be considered when establishing speed limits are the
following:
Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance
The pace speed
Roadside development (nearby school) and environment
Parking practices and pedestrian activity (mainly children)
Reported crash experience for at least a 12‐month period
Methods and Practices for Setting Speed Limits: An Informational Report by the FHWA Safety
Program:
Most engineering approaches to speed limit setting are based on the 85th percentile speed—
the speed at which 85 percent of free‐flowing traffic is traveling at or below. The typical
procedure is to set the speed limit at or near the 85th percentile speed of free‐flow traffic.
Adjustments to either increase or decrease the speed limits may be made depending on
infrastructure and traffic conditions.
The 85th percentile speed method is also attractive because it reflects the collective judgment
of the vast majority of drivers as to a reasonable speed for given traffic and roadway conditions.
This is aligned with the general policy sentiment that laws (i.e., speed limits) should not make
people acting reasonably into law‐breakers. Setting a speed limit even 5 mph below the 85th
percentile speed can make almost half the drivers illegal; setting a speed limit 5 mph above the
85th percentile speed will likely make few additional drivers legal.
Under the operating speed method of setting speed limits, the first approximation of the speed
limit is to set the speed limit at the 85th percentile speed. The MnMUTCD recommends that the
speed limit be within 5 mph of the 85th percentile speed of free‐flowing traffic. The posted
speed limit shall be in multiples of 5 mph.
108
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
While the MnMUTCD recommends setting the posted speed limits near the 85th percentile
speed, and traffic engineers say that agencies are using the 85th percentile speed to set speed
limits, the speed limit is often set much lower. At these locations, the 85th percentile operating
speeds exceed the posted speed limits; and, in many cases, the 50th percentile operating speed
is either near or exceeds that posted speed limit as well. Many agencies deviate from their
agency's written guidelines and instead post lower speed limits. According to an ITE Engineering
Council Technical Committee survey, these reduced speed limits are often the result of political
pressures.
NOTE: Federal and State speed limit guidelines define the 85th percentile speed as a
“reasonable speed” or the speed in which 85% of motorists travel at or below. Experience has
shown that the 85th Percentile Speed most closely provides for a safe and reasonable speed
limit. Therefore, it can be expected that on a typical roadway, approximately 15 percent of the
vehicles may be traveling at speeds greater than the posted speed limit.
It is important to note that setting speed limits lower than 85th percentile speed does not
encourage compliance with the posted speed limit.
109
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
Appendix C
110
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418‐1699 www.ci.saint‐anthony.mn.us (612) 782‐3301 Fax (612) 782‐3302
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village which is sustainable, safe and secure.
INTERSECTION LOCATION: ____________________________________________________________________
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONTROL: _______________________________________ DATE: ____________________
This Residential Street Stop Control Justification Worksheet is applicable only to intersections of residential streets with speed limits of 30 miles
Per hour. This procedure is “not” to be applied to the intersection of a local residential street with a major collector or arterial street as
identified in the City’s Transportation Plan.
APPROACH SPEEDS 1 2
Uncontrolled approach speed. Check two boxes, one for the 30 miles per hour or less 0 points
85th percentile approach speed group and one for the highest
recorded speed group with two or more observations. 31 to 35 miles per hour 10 points
= 85th percentile approach speed (highest approach) 36 to 38 miles per hour 20 points
= highest recorded speed group with two or more
39 to 42 miles per hour 30 points
observations. 43 to 45 miles per hour 40 points
46 miles per hour or more 50 points
TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1 2
Intersection approach daily traffic volume. Check one box Less than 250 vehicles per day 0 points
for the total major street approach volume and one box for the
highest minor street leg. 250 to 450 vehicles per day 10 points
= total daily traffic volume for both major street 450 to 700 vehicles per day 20 points
approaches
= highest minor street approach daily traffic
700 to 1000 vehicles per day 30 points
volume (times two). More than 1000 vehicles per day 40 points
The safe stopping sight distance on any uncontrolled approach is restricted to less than 300 feet by
horizontal and/or vertical roadway alignment, or by other “permanent” obstructions to sight distance.
(See Figure 1)
The safe stopping sight distance on any uncontrolled approach is greater than 300 feet but less than
450 feet due to horizontal and/or vertical roadway alignment, or other “permanent” obstructions
to sight distance. (See Figure 1)
50 points
10 points
The number of reported traffic accidents at the subject intersection within the past 12 months _= ________x 10 points = __________
School, park, bus stop or other major pedestrian generator causing many pedestrians to cross the 20 points
subject intersection.
PREPARED BY: _________________________________________________________
Total Points
*If the worksheet point total is greater than or equal to 100 points, all-way stop control may be “justified” at the subject intersection.
RESIDENTIAL STREET ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL JUSTIFICATION WORKSHEET
SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTION
OTHER CONDITIONS
1
2
1
2
111
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
112
City Council Meeting
November 13, 2018
7:00 PM
27th Avenue NE/Pahl Avenue Area NE
Traffic Study
Study Location Map
113
•Review Study Purpose, Objectives and Process
•Discuss data collection
•Discuss identified neighborhood traffic issues and concerns
•Discuss alternative solutions and recommendations
•Receive input on issues and solutions
Purpose of the Meeting
•Improve vehicle and pedestrian safety
•Apply least restrictive control type possible
•Traffic control consistency
•Not to promote cut-through traffic or diversion of traffic
•Not to promote speeding
Study Objectives
114
•Identify neighborhood issues:
1.Traffic operations (signing, pavement markings, pedestrians,
sight distance, etc.)
2.Speeding
3.Cut-through traffic
•Determine potential low impact, low cost improvements
Study Purpose
•Collect existing data –Completed
•Gather neighborhood input –Completed
•Collect additional data if needed -Completed
•Conduct preliminary analysis -Completed
•Present findings to City Council -Tonight
•Prepare final report and recommendations
Study Process
115
•Existing Traffic Control / Signing
•Traffic Volumes
1.Weekday hourly peak hours (AM, PM, School)
2.Weekend hourly peak hours (Saturday, Sunday)
3.Daily
•Pedestrian Volumes
•Speed
•Vehicle Classification (Heavy Vehicles)
•Alley Counts
Data Collection
Traffic Control / Signing
116
Hourly Traffic Volumes –Weekday
Hourly Traffic Volume -Weekend
117
Daily Traffic Volumes
Hourly Pedestrian Volumes -Weekday
118
Hourly Pedestrian Volumes -Weekend
85% Speed
119
Vehicle Classification
•Vehicle traffic volumes
•Speeding
•Cut-through traffic
•Pedestrian and bicycle traffic / Circulation
•School traffic
•Adjacent development
Identified Issues
120
•Traffic is Local to the Neighborhood
–Typical residential street 500 –1000vpd
–Volumes range from 110 to 750vpd
•Heavy vehicles
–Typical residential street 2%-5% trucks
–% trucks range from 0% to 4.7%
Issues Review –Traffic Volumes
•Guideline -85% Speed
•Typical speed limit on neighborhood streets is 30mph
•Existing 85% speed ranges from 25.0 to 32.4
Issues Review –Speed
121
•Study Area captive with limited number of streets
•Standard ITE Traffic Generation rate of approximately 10 trips/day
•Approximately 92 homes in area or 920 trips from the residential
area
•Travel time with stop signs
•Traffic volumes show possible cut through
–Wilson St/27th St
–Coolidge St/Pahl Ave
Issues Review –Cut Through Traffic
•Traffic control changes
•Revised / additional signing
•Revised pavement markings
•Technology (driver feedback signs, blinker signs, etc.)
Possible Traffic Improvements
122
•Safety:
–Continue working with Hennepin County on future improvements at
Kenzie Terrace and 27th Avenue NE
•Speed:
–Provide additional speed enforcement
–Develop a policy for the use and possible installation of a driver feed-
back signs in the city.
Recommendations
•Pedestrian:
–Develop City policy for location of a School Speed Zone (20mph).
This may be applied to 27th Avenue NE and Stinson Boulevard.
–Changes to Stinson Boulevard will required approval from the MPRB
•Cut-Through:
–Review additional signage on northbound and southbound Coolidge
St at Pahl Avenue NE
–Consider “No Thru Traffic” signs on both ends of the alleys between
Wilson Street and Roosevelt Street
–Continue to monitor traffic as adjacent development continues
Recommendations
123
Questions / Comments
124
S:\1Council Meetings\2018\11132018\Resolution 18-073- Neighborhood Traffic.docx
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 18-073
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE 27TH AVENUE AND PAHL AVENUE
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY AND ADOPTING THE TRAFFIC DEVICE
INSTALLATION POLICY
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony residents have requested the study of traffic in the 27th Avenue
and Pahl Avenue Neighborhood;
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony has completed the requested neighborhood traffic study.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village
accepts the 27th Avenue and Pahl Avenue Neighborhood Traffic Study and;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City adopts the Traffic Device Installation Policy; and
NOW BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City Manager, is hereby authorized to work collaboratively
with the Counties of Ramsey and Hennepin, and the Minneapolis Park Board to develop and install
school zone speed limits where permitted.
Adopted this 13th day of November, 2018.
_____________________________
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
ATTEST:____________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Reviewed for administration: ______________________________
Mark Casey, City Manager
125
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
126
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Meeting Date: November 13, 2018
Resolution- a resolution Ratifying the 2019-2020 Agreement between the Law Enforcement Labor
Services, Inc. #186 Local Representing the St. Anthony Police Department Licensed Employees and the
City of St. Anthony Village
OVERVIEW:
In from of you this evening is a resolution ratifying the contract agreement with the police union. This is a
two (2) year contract with the St. Anthony Police Department’s licensed employees. There will be a 3.25%
increase for both 2019 and 2020. Health insurance premium increases will be split equally between City
and employees.
127
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
128
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 18-074
A RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE 2019 - 2020 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. #186 LOCAL
REPRESENTING THE ST. ANTHONY POLICE DEPARTMENT LICENSED
EMPLOYEES AND THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the 2019 – 2020 Agreement between the Law Enforcement
Labor Services, Inc., Local #186 representing the St. Anthony Police Department
Licensed Employees, and the City of St. Anthony Village is hereby ratified. The Mayor
and City Manager are authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.
Adopted this 13th day of November, 2018.
_________________________________
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Reviewed for administration: _________________________________
Mark Casey, City Manager
129
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
130
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Meeting Date: November 13, 2018
Resolution- a resolution Ratifying the 2019-2020 Agreement between the International Association of Fire
Fighters, Local 3486 Representing the St. Anthony Fire Department Employees and the City of St.
Anthony Village.
OVERVIEW:
In from of you this evening is a resolution ratifying the contract agreement with the fire union. This is a two
(2) year contract with the St. Anthony Fire Department’s employees. There will be a 3.25% increase for
both 2019 and 2020. Health insurance premium increases will be split equally between City and employees.
131
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
132
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 18-075
A RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE 2019 - 2020 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS, LOCAL 3486
REPRESENTING THE ST. ANTHONY FIRE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES
AND THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the 2019 – 2020 Agreement between the International
Association of Fire Fighters, Local 3486 Representing the St. Anthony Fire Department
Employees and the City of St. Anthony Village is hereby ratified. The Mayor and City
Manager are authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.
Adopted this 13th day of November, 2018.
_________________________________
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Reviewed for administration: _________________________________
Mark Casey, City Manager
133
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
134
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Meeting Date: November 13, 2018
Resolution- a resolution Ratifying the 2019-2020 Agreement between the International Union of Operating
Engineers Local No. 49 AFL-CIO Representing the St. Anthony Public Works Department Employees and
the City of St. Anthony Village.
OVERVIEW:
In from of you this evening is a resolution ratifying the contract agreement with the public works union.
This is a two (2) year contract with the St. Anthony Public Works Department employees. There will be a
3.25% increase for both 2019 and 2020. Health insurance premium increases will be split equally between
City and employees.
135
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
136
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 18-076
A RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE 2019 - 2020 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO. 49
AFL-CIO REPRESENTING THE ST. ANTHONY PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES AND THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the 2019 – 2020 Agreement between the International Union of
Operating Engineers Local No. 49 AFL-CIO Representing the St. Anthony Public Works
Department Employees and the City of St. Anthony Village is hereby ratified. The
Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.
Adopted this 13th day of November, 2018.
_________________________________
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Reviewed for administration: _________________________________
Mark Casey, City Manager
137
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
138
St. Anthony Village
Liquor Operations
Operations Update
November 13, 2018
Convenient Locations
Silver Lake Village
Store is located at
2602 39th Ave.
Marketplace Store
is located at 2700
Highway 88.
139
Mission Statement
Our goal is to actively prevent
the sale of beverages that contain
alcohol to minors and intoxicated
persons, while simultaneously
generating revenue for the
community, in accordance with
all city, state and county liquor
laws and ordinances.
Vision Statement
The St. Anthony Village Wine and
Spirits brand is committed to
providing a unique retail
environment that is based on
excellent customer service,
product selection, competitive
pricing, while providing safe,
bright and clean stores that drive
long term customer loyalty.
140
Sales Update
New Point of Sale
System
L.E.D. Lighting
Project at Silver Lake
Village Location
Customer Royalty
Program
Holiday Wine Event
Liquor Operations Update
Sales and Profit Update:
January -September 2017 vs January -September 2018
Increase
(Decrease)
Sales $58,789.96
Less: Purchases/Cost
of Goods Sold ($893.42)
Gross Profit $59,683.38
Operating Expense:
Salaries, Wages,
Benefits $46,463.94
All Other Expenses $1,855.57
Total Operating
Expense $48,319.51
Profit from Operations $11,363.87
Non/Operating
Rev/Expenditures $476.50
Net Income $11,840.37
141
New Point of Sale System
New System Replaced
Equipment Purchased in
2010
Faster Credit Card
Processing Time
Up To Date Credit Card
Security Compliance
Larger Customer Display
Monitors
Loyalty Rewards Program
Ability
L.E.D. Lighting Project
Silver Lake Village
Store
Sales Floor Lights
Interior Cooler Lights
Back Room Lights
Exterior & Office
Lighting Completed
in 2017
142
Customer Royalty Program
Kick-off on Saturday
November 17th
No Cost to Join!
Customers Earn
Royalty Points
Special Pricing for
Members
Program is Designed
to Create and Reward
Customer Loyalty
Program Will Be Used
to Market New
Promotions, Products
and limited release
items
Program Rules Will be
Available on Our Web
Site and In-Store
Holiday Wine Sampling Event
Saturday
November 17,
2018
Marketplace
Store
2:00-5:00 pm
Wine, Spirits &
Beer
All Sampled
Items On Sale
Sign Up for the
Royalty Program!
143
Website www.savmn.com
Event Calendar
Royalty Program
Product Requests
Store Hours
Contact Information
“Notify Me”,Email &
Text Alerts
144
Date Type Staff Present
November 19 Special
5:30 pm Work Session - Emergency Management Exercise
City Council
City Manager
Dept. Heads
November 27 Regular
Fire Prevention Poster Winners
Municipal Consent for Co. Rd. C project
Water Conservation Poster Winners
2nd Reading Water, Sewer, & Stormwater
Sheriff Jack Serier
Authorizing Submittal of final comp plan to Met Council
Authorizing polling places for 2019
City Council
City Manager
Fire Dept
Public Works Director
December 3 Special
5:30 pm Work Session City Council
City Manager
December 11 Regular
Planning Commission items from November
Appoint Parks and Planning Commissioners and Chair/Vice Chairs
Setting Salary of City Manager
Authorizing Transfers & Closing of Specified Funds
Setting the 2019 City & HRA Budgets and Final Property Tax Levy -Public Hearing
Final Reading Water, Sewer, & Stormwater
2019 Fee Schedule
2019 Street Project Approve Plans & Specifications, Authorize Advertisement for Bids
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
City Engineer
December 26 Regular
City Council
City Manager
January 8 Regular
Planning Commission items from December
Housekeeping Resolutions
Resolution for the Street Improvement Bond Reimbursement
Quarterly Donations & Grants
City Council
City Manager
January 10 Special
9:00 a.m.Goal Setting
City Council
City Manager
Dept Heads
January 11 Special
9:00 a.m.Goal Setting
City Council
City Manager
Dept Heads
January 22 Regular
2019 Parks Commission Work Plan- (motion only)
Solsmart Designation
City Council Outside Organization assignments
City Council
City Manager
January 29 Special
5:30 p.m.Joint Meeting with School Board
City Council
City Manager
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
2018
2019
145
Date Type Staff Present
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
February 12 Regular
Planning Commission items from January
2019 Street Project Call for Hearing on Improvements, Call for Hearing on Assessments,
Order Preparation of Assessments
Snow Plowing presentation
City Council
City Manager
City Engineer
Public Works Director
February 26 Regular Administration Annual Report
Adoption of Strategic Plan
City Council
City Manager
March 12 Regular
Planning Commission Items from February
Presentation from Ramsey County Sheriff Jack Serier
Liquor Annual Report
Fire Annual Report
Liquor License Renewals
GreenCorp Member application-resolution
City Council
City Manager
Fire Dept
Liquor Op Manager
March 26 Regular
2019 Street Project Public Hearing, Order Improvements, Adopt & Confirm Assessments,
Award Contract for Construction, Call for Sale of GO Bonds
Police Annual Report
City Council
City Manager
Police Dept
City Engineer
April 9 Regular
Planning Commission Items from March
Quarterly Donations & Grants
Public Works Annual Report
Spirit of St. Anthony Award
City Council
City Manager
Public Works Director
April 23 Regular
Arbor Day Proclamation
1st Quarter Goals Update
2019 Street Project Approve Sale of Bonds
Students in Governement Presentation
2019 Planning Commission Work Plan-(motion only)
City Council
City Manager
City Planner
May 14 Regular
Planning Commission items from April
Chamber of the Year and Business of the Year
Finance Annual Report
Public Hearing-Budget Calendar
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
May 28 Regular
Salo Park Concert Series
Insurance Renewal
Tort Limits - Consent
Order 2021 Street & Utility Recon Feasibility Study
City Council
City Manager
City Engineer
May_Special
4:30 p.m.Tour of the City City Council
City Manager
June 11 Regular Planning Commission Items from May City Council
City Manager
146
Date Type Staff Present
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
June 25 Regular Audit Presentation
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
July 9 Regular
Planning Commission items from June
Quarterly Donations & Grants
Quarterly Goals Update
City Council
City Manager
July 23 Regular
Night to Unite Presentation
Night to Unite Proclamation
Liquor Operations Mid Year Report
VillageFest Presentation
City Council
City Manager
Police Chief
Liquor Op Mgr
August 13 Regular
Planning Commission items from July
SANB #282 Presentation
City Council
City Manager
August 27 Regular
Budget Presentation
Sheriff Stanek presentation
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
September 10 Regular
Planning Commission items from August
2020 Preliminary Operating Budget and Levy-Public Hearing
Kiwanis Peanut Day
Approve 2020 Street & Utility Recon Feasibility Study & order 2020 Plans and Specs
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
City Engineer
September 24 Regular Fire Prevention Presentation
Commissioner Mary Jo McGuire
City Council
City Manager
Fire Dept
October 8 Regular
Planning Commission items from September
Quarterly Donations & Grants
Certification of Delinquent Waste Hauler Accounts-Consent Agenda
Certification of Delinquent Utility Accounts-Consent Agenda
Quarterly Goals Update
City Council
City Manager
October 22 Regular Approval of CIP
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
November 12 Regular
Planning Commission items from October
1st Reading Water, Sewer, & Stormwater-Public Hearing
Union Contracts
City Council
City Manager
147
October 2018
Production & Programming
PRODUCTION
PROGRAMMING
SOCIAL MEDIA/WEB
• RAMSEY COUNTY LIBRARY “Tuesday with a Scholar”
ü Oct. 2: Teresa Collett, St. Thomas Law Professor - ‘Constitution-Pt. 3’ (1hr 35m)
ü Oct. 9: Mark Osler, St. Thomas Professor, ‘Presidential Pardon’ (1hr 28m)
ü Oct. 16: Elaine May, U of M Professor, ‘Fortress America’ (1hr 22m)
ü Oct. 23: Nancy Wagner, Author, ‘Alice in France’ (58m)
• NORTH SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION October 25th Meeting
• CTV NEW PROGRAMS (84 Total) = 118.45 hours of programming
• CITY MEETINGS (41 Total): 3 – St. Anthony meetings
• HOUSE 41B Candidates Forum: Oct. 1 – tape delayed
• 282 SCHOOL BOARD MEETING (2 Total): Oct. 2 & Oct. 30
• COUNTY MEETINGS (5 Total): Ramsey County Board Meetings live on Ch19 (9am)
• RICE CREEK WATERSHED MEETINGS (2 Total): Oct. 10 & Oct. 24
• SPORTS PROGRAMS (19 Total new) 2 events featuring St. Anthony High School
ü St. Anthony HS: Football (1), Boys Soccer (1)
• FACEBOOK (37 posts for the month)
• Daily average of people reached = 165
• CTV Facebook page: Total Likes = 730
• LIVE WEB STREAMS (non-meeting)
ü 10 Total = 5,101 hits through 11/1
§ Sports (8) 3,427 hits
§ Candidates Forums (2) 1,674 hits
148