Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br />October 22, 2018 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br /> 1 <br />(G) Decks which are not higher than thirty (30) inches above grade at any given point along the 2 <br />grade are permitted to encroach into the rear yard setback by 10 feet and the side yard setback, as 3 <br />long as a minimum side yard setback of 5 feet is maintained. This encroachment does not apply 4 <br />in the R-1A Residential Lakeshore District or to decks higher than thirty (30) inches above grade 5 <br />at any given point along the grade. Such decks must comply with the setbacks for principal 6 <br />structures. 7 <br /> 8 <br />City Planner Rothstein noted this is the zoning code and does not need to match the building 9 <br />code. She reviewed the discussion held at the last meeting. This Ordinance will have a policy 10 <br />impact closer to the rear property line than currently written. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Commissioner Neumann asked about not including the R-1A Residential Lakeshore District. Ms. 13 <br />Rothstein stated this section of code allows for an exception and within the R-1A no exceptions 14 <br />are available. If there is a platform deck or a deck at grade those are okay to encroach but if there 15 <br />is a tall deck, on the second story, the 25-foot property setback should remain. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Commissioner Larson asked if a structure is under 30 inches but closer than 5 feet to the house 18 <br />will it be subject to the setbacks of the primary structure. Ms. Rothstein responded if it is under 19 <br />30 inches that is what is allowed to encroach into the setback. It must maintain 5 feet on the side 20 <br />but can encroach up to 10 feet in the rear setback. A deck is defined as an attached structure if 21 <br />within 5 feet. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Commissioner Westrick asked for clarification on the definition of deck. Ms. Rothstein stated 24 <br />there are two different sections and if a deck is free standing, it is considered an accessory 25 <br />building. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Commissioner Neumann asked about those properties that have alleys. Ms. Rothstein stated 28 <br />when setbacks are determined it is from the property line. The property line is at the alley. 29 <br />There are no stricter requirements for alleys than for properties without an alley. Commissioner 30 <br />Neumann asked if someone was not on an alley and wanted to construct a carriage house with a 31 <br />deck on top, would that be exempt. Ms. Rothstein stated that would be allowed. Grade is an 32 <br />issue. Commissioner Neumann asked if Mary Friend would be able to build her deck as she 33 <br />wishes. Ms. Rothstein stated it would not allow her to build her deck at eight feet. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Commissioner Larson asked what the R-1 rear yard setback is and Ms. Rothstein stated 25 feet 36 <br />or 20% of the depth of the lot whichever is greater. Ms. Rothstein stated the setback varies based 37 <br />on the zoning district and the lot depth. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Vice Chair Socha opened the public hearing at 7:28 p.m. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Ms. Mary Friend, 3113 Edward Street NE, stated she is hoping to build a low-level deck in her 42 <br />backyard. She attended the Planning Commission Meeting in September and noted the setback is 43 <br />now 15 feet. The plan she brought to the Commission last year had a 7- or 8-foot setback. She 44 <br />does not think she is asking for anything extreme. Ms. Friend read the definition of a patio and 45