My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019 Goal Setting Session Packet
StAnthony
>
Administration
>
Annual Reports
>
Annual Goal Setting packets
>
2019 Goal Setting Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/2/2019 10:43:02 AM
Creation date
1/2/2019 10:39:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PRESENTATION TITLE (EDIT ON MASTER)Conclusion•So where do we stand?–Even without the disorderly conduct statute, cities still have the right and the responsibility to maintain “order” in their proceedings–This can include reasonable restrictions on speech, including time limits, restricting discussion to the topic at hand, and preventing repetitive interruptions•It can also include physically removing disruptors from the room, if necessary–Above all, the rules must be enforced uniformly and the council cannot take arbitrary enforcement action–Further, the Henselcase indicates that courts do not look fondly on cases in which cities overreact in an attempt to maintain order (e.g., by filing criminal charges)11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.