My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 01082019
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2019
>
CC MINUTES 01082019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2019 10:21:40 AM
Creation date
1/23/2019 10:21:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />January 8, 2019 <br />Page 3 <br />1 and pool mechanical equipment and Sections 152.054 applying to setbacks for building. A <br />2 drawing of the proposed accessory building was shown. Mr. Papatola reviewed the Criteria for <br />3 Variance Approval noting which criteria were met and not met. <br />The Planning Commission recommends denial of the variance request for the swimming pool and <br />swimming pool mechanical equipment and approval of the variance request for an accessory <br />structure. <br />9 Councilmember Stille noted these variances are rather extreme and asked what the Planning <br />10 Commission considered as far as the accessory building. Chair Papatola stated the plans showed <br />11 the building would be obtrusive and similar to another building constructed at Silverwood Park. <br />12 <br />13 Councilmember Jensen noted Silver Lake is a public lake and asked if the DNR has any <br />14 regulations as far as the setback. Planning Chair Papatola stated the 75 feet is a fairly common <br />15 setback requirement. Councilmember Jensen stated the DNR specifications should be considered. <br />16 <br />17 Councilmember Jensen referred to the findings of fact and four of the criteria not met on the <br />18 accessory structure. Mr. Papatola stated in the past, the Planning Commission has recommended <br />19 approval of variances that do not meet all criteria. <br />20 <br />21 Mayor Faust clarified since Silverwood Park was an example, this was a facility to be used by the <br />22 public. A public facility does not fall the same way as a private facility. Mayor Faust recalled the <br />23 75 feet was determined based on the DNR specifications. <br />24 <br />25 Ms. Alisa Bartel, 4021 Silver Lake Terrace, thanked Council for their consideration. They are <br />26 requesting two variances. She stated the accessory building would be on their private property and <br />27 the steep nature of their property makes their distance to their home up three flights of stairs. <br />28 They were recent victims of a home invasion and it is important to them to secure their personal <br />29 property. Ms. Bartel noted their impervious surface would be 29.09 %, which is well under the <br />30 35% in the City Code. All their neighbors are in support of their plans. <br />31 <br />32 Councilmember Gray asked what the DNR requirements are and Mr. Casey stated that would be <br />33 consistent with the 75 feet. <br />34 <br />35 Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve Resolution 19- <br />36 012; a Resolution Adopting Findings of Fact and Reasons for Denial of a Variance Request for a <br />37 Swimming Pool and Pool Mechanical Equipment in the Required Setback by Dan and Alisa <br />38 Bartel at 4021 Silver Lake Terrace. <br />39 <br />40 Councilmember Stille noted there is more that should be brought out in fairness to the applicant <br />41 and to the City. The 75 -foot line is there so the shoreline is not constructed upon. The City needs <br />42 to be consistent. <br />43 <br />44 Mayor Faust stated any time the Council deviated they would be setting a precedence. The <br />45 existing swimming pools were there before the Code change. <br />46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.