Laserfiche WebLink
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY <br />U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ST. PAUL DISTRICT <br />180 FIFTH STREET EAST, SUITE 700 <br />ST. PAUL, MN 55101-1678 <br />Regulatory File No. 2019-01223-MMJ <br />City of St. Anthony Village <br />c/o Mark Casey – City Manager <br />3301 Silver Lake Road <br />St. Anthony, MN 55418 <br />Dear Mr. Casey: <br />This letter is in response to the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) that we <br />received for the Silver Lake Village Multifamily Redevelopment project, which includes a 13-acre <br />parcel located at 3800 Silver Lake Road. This letter contains our initial comments on this project <br />for your consideration. The water resources section of the EAW referenced above indicates <br />that the Silver Lake Redevelopment project site may contain an aquatic resource that could <br />potentially be regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA Section 404). If the <br />project proposes to impact the aquatic resource on the parcel a Department of the Army (DA) <br />permit may be required for your proposed activity, as described below. <br />If the proposal involves discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, <br />it may be subject to the Corps of Engineers’ jurisdiction under CWA Section 404. Waters of the <br />United States include navigable waters, their tributaries, and adjacent wetlands (33 CFR § <br />328.3). CWA Section 301(a) prohibits discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the <br />United States, unless the work has been authorized by a Department of the Army permit under <br />Section 404. Information about the Corps permitting process can be obtained online at <br />http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory. <br />The Corps evaluation of a Section 404 permit application involves multiple analyses, <br />including (1) evaluating the proposal’s impacts in accordance with the National Environmental <br />Policy Act (NEPA) (33 CFR part 325), (2) determining whether the proposal is contrary to the <br />public interest (33 CFR § 320.4), and (3) in the case of a Section 404 permit, determining <br />whether the proposal complies with the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines (Guidelines) (40 CFR part <br />230). <br />If the proposal requires a Section 404 permit application, the Guidelines specifically require <br />that “no discharge of dredged or fill material shall be permitted if there is a practicable <br />alternative to the proposed discharge which would have less adverse impact on the aquatic <br />ecosystem, so long as the alternative does not have other significant adverse environmental <br />consequences” (40 CFR § 230.10(a)). Time and money spent on the proposal prior to applying <br />for a Section 404 permit cannot be factored into the Corps’ decision whether there is a less <br />damaging practicable alternative to the proposal. <br />If an application for a Corps permit has not yet been submitted, the project proposer may <br />request a pre-application consultation meeting with the Corps to obtain information regarding <br />the data, studies or other information that will be necessary for the permit evaluation process. <br />A pre-application consultation meeting is strongly recommended if the proposal has substantial <br />impacts to waters of the United States, or if it is a large or controversial project. <br />July 11, 2019