My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PK PACKET 01102000
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Parks and Environmental Commission Packets
>
2000
>
PK PACKET 01102000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2019 8:02:17 AM
Creation date
8/7/2019 8:02:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes <br />December 13, 1999 <br />Page 2 <br />1 then became involved more specifically with park projects when the City began the parks and <br />2 recreation portion of the Comprehensive Plan. As part of that work, City Manager Michael <br />3 Morrison requested that BRW investigate redeveloping Central Park due, in part, to the new <br />4 Community Center and City Hall. BRW began coordinating with an Ad Hoc Committee, of <br />5 which several of the current Parks Commissioners were involved. <br />6 Mr. Kost continued by stating that in 1997 and 1998, the task force began looking at the configu- <br />7 ration of Central Park. Three different plans were developed and one of those plans was ap- <br />8 proved by the City Council. Then, flooding in the City became an issue and all the parks were <br />9 reviewed for ability to accommodate storm water. <br />10 It as at this time, Mr. Kost stated, that the north side of Central Park was designated as a swale to <br />11 hold storm water. He further stated that the Parks Commission was then formed, in part, from <br />12 the Ad Hoc Committee. <br />13 Mr. Kost continued by stating that BRW has coordinated with the Parks Commission in 1999 to <br />14 achieve a series of objectives, goals, and wish lists. The current plan presented reflects im- <br />15 plementation of agreed-upon ideas and opinions, but Mr. Kost reaffirmed that there is work left <br />16 to be done. <br />17 Mr. Kost drew the Commission's attention to the proposed plan of Central Park, which included <br />18 four playfields, a possible trail system, playground area, performance area and other features. <br />19 Jensen clarified that a performance area for Central Park would consist of a place for concerts, <br />20 plays, and outdoor performance activities. <br />21 Council Liaison Marks stated that the City Council had approved the proposed plan because the <br />22 land appeared to be maximally utilized and the plan was the most comprehensive. Mr. Marks <br />23 stated that the City felt that the approved plan was the best option in the long run for the City. <br />24 George Zurbey, 3627 Benjamin St. NE, inquired about the length and width of the proposed soc- <br />25 cer field. Mr. Wong responded that the proposed size is 200 feet x 330 feet. The practice foot - <br />26 ball field, Mr. Wong stated, is 165 feet x 340 feet. Mr. Kost responded by stating that football <br />27 could be played on any of the soccer fields, but that there is a dedicated practice field. <br />28 Management of the activities on the fields was discussed. Jensen stated that he felt the <br />29 scheduling and management of the fields would be primarily the School Board's responsibility. <br />30 He further stated that the real issue at hand is that the Parks Commission needed to pursue <br />31 possibilities to procure additional land for park use. <br />32 Louiselle stated that he felt it was essential that the proposed field accommodate regulation <br />33 games in order to be fully utilized. Mr. Wong responded that a regulation soccer field is 195 feet <br />34 x 330 feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.