Laserfiche WebLink
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes <br />January 11, 1999 <br />Page 3 <br />I Jindra expressed concern with regard to providing a place for rollerbladers so they don't use the <br />2 trail system. Kost stated the hockey area was not a possibility unless the Watershed agreed to <br />3 deal with runoff in another way. Roadfeldt asked whether the lower parking area near the <br />4 wading pool could be used for rollerblading. Kost stated the circuitous trail could be widened to <br />5 10 feet and would then be appropriate for multi -use. <br />7 Kost requested the Commission's consideration of the play area's configuration, carving out <br />8 spaces and using existing trees. Wolff stated the Commission's play equipment subcommittee <br />9 had compiled a list of desirable equipment, and asked whether plans and bids would be provided <br />10 by Kost based on that list. <br />11 <br />12 Kost stated the Commission must define the area, determine restoration of plant material and <br />13 configuration of the trail connection from the community center, and on a performance basis of <br />14 what the subcommittee and Commission have decided, specifications will be issued by the City <br />15 and the Commission will receive bids based on those specifications. <br />16 <br />17 Jindra asked where a swingset would be best situated. Kost stated swings have a physical <br />18 requirement of a 20 feet radius around them, and require a relatively flat surface. Wolff asked <br />19 for a specific timeline based on the July 1, 1999 park opening determined by the City Council. <br />A Kost stated 45 days in May and June are required for construction; bids would be opened in the <br />22 middle of April with 2 weeks to negotiate the contract, and construction to begin on May 1. He <br />23 added the project must be out for bid in the end of March to allow a 3 -week bid time. <br />24 <br />25 Morris asked whether the ornamental fence would be included in the bid, and how much such a <br />26 fence might cost. Kost stated the fence could be bid as an alternate, or priced on a lineal basis to <br />27 determine how much fence is affordable. He added 36" ornamental fencing runs from $40-100 <br />28 per lineal foot. <br />29 <br />30 Wolff asked how much time BRW required to provide the bid specifications. Kost stated two <br />31 months, February and March, will be sufficient. He added the plans must be defined, brought to <br />32 the Commission for comments, then finalized and returned to the Commission and Council for <br />33 approval before going out to bid. <br />34 <br />35 Kost stated he would require the Commission's equipment specifications before its February <br />36 meeting at which the Commission could hold a lengthy workshop to arrive at a final plan. He <br />37 added the final plan would be completed for the Commission's March meeting and taken directly <br />38 to the City Council for approval at their fust March meeting. <br />39 <br />40 Kosciolek asked how playground equipment vendors fit into the process. Kost stated 1) a play <br />' 1 structure design is put out for bid or "approved equal"; or 2) a performance specification is <br />12 presented to the vendor who provides designs based on an agreed price. Kosciolek asked which <br />43 option is more advantageous under time constraints. Kost stated a performance specification <br />44 presents definite time advantages. <br />