My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PK PACKET 04142000
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Parks and Environmental Commission Packets
>
2000
>
PK PACKET 04142000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2019 9:00:18 AM
Creation date
8/7/2019 9:00:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes <br />July 10, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br />1 In response to Chair Jindra's question regarding the difference between the prefabricated <br />2 building as opposed to what was considered before, Mr. Kost stated that difference is that the <br />3 prefabricated building has smaller space requirements and is not custom built. It allows for <br />4 additional flexibility. <br />5 Mr. Kost mentioned that the trails would be constructed so that maintenance vehicles would <br />6 be able to drive on the trail as necessary. Jenson mentioned the importance of vehicles being <br />7 able to have access to the trails for deliveries to the concession stand, among other things. <br />8 In response to some concern regarding the estimated cost of the redevelopment, Mr. Kost <br />9 stated that many items on the cost estimate were optional; however, BRW wished to present <br />10 the Commissioners with the best possible scenario for the Park and allow for reductions from <br />11 that point. <br />12 In response to an inquiry by Hallada regarding the cost of the building considered prior to <br />13 this meeting, Mr. Kost stated that the cost of the custom bathroom/concession stand would <br />14 have been approximately $50,000 once the fixtures were added. The prefabricated <br />15 bathroom/concession stand is estimated at $80,000; however Mr. Kost stated that a goal was <br />16 to have a building that would have an attractive appearance, durability, and easily <br />17 maintained. <br />is Mr. Kost and the Commission reviewed a sketch of a floor plan for the bathroom facility and <br />19 various discussion ensued regarding potential modifications of the floor plan and bathroom. <br />20 Lighting of the park was discussed, and Koehntop mentioned the possibility that lighting <br />21 would not be needed on a regular basis due to Daylight Savings Time. He mentioned the <br />22 potential cost of the lighting as well. Sports Boosters Representative George Zurbey <br />23 mentioned that most parks are utilized until approximately 10:00 p.m., and due to the fact <br />24 that it starts to get dark by 9:00 p.m., lights could be an important feature. Jenson agreed, <br />25 particularly due to the fact that lighting requirements would be needed into the fall as <br />26 Daylight Savings Time decreases. <br />27 The location -- and the amount of lights -- was discussed, bearing in mind the close proximity <br />28 of the surrounding residents. <br />29 Jenson mentioned that he would like to particularly discuss lighting on two fields, which <br />30 would result in a figure of $160,000, as opposed to a figure of $280,000 which was <br />31 mentioned on the redevelopment cost estimate. <br />32 Mr. Kost mentioned that the Commission had previously discussed lighting the hockey rink, <br />33 and additionally inquired of the Commissioners if lighting on the trail would be considered. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.