PK PACKET 01292001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Parks Commission Meeting Minutes January 8, 2001 Page 6 1 Skrivseth questioned if storage areas were noted within this plan. Mr. Druger indicated he 2 designed storage areas throughout the pavilion and that doors and locks could be added to the 3 storage for safety and security. 4 Jindra asked if the restrooms would have access from the indoors and outdoors. Mr. Druger 5 indicated indoor and outdoor access would add to the number of square feet within the structure 6 but could be accomplished. He indicated he wasn't certain of the Commission's wishes when 7 designing the proposed pavilion. 8 Koehntop asked if the positioning of the restrooms would be a concern. Mr. Hartman noted there 9 would be a concern with the restrooms in the rear of the building as far as vandalism. He 10 explained that they would not be attractive in the front either. 1 I Jindra asked if the windows were standard windows or vandal proof. Mr. Druger indicated the 12 windows were placed relatively high on the structure to avoid easy access and provide 13 ventilation. He noted the siding would be painted concrete block which would be easy to remove 14 any graffiti from vandals. 15 Mr. Hartman asked for a sketch on the concession stand. Mr. Druger indicated he did not have a 6 sketch of the building at this time, but indicated it would have a similar structure as the pavilion 17 but scaled down to a 20 foot by 20 foot building with restrooms and a concession stand. 18 Jenson asked if the height of each structure would be the same. Mr. Druger indicated the height 19 of the pavilion and picnic area would be within one foot of each other. 20 Mr. Hartman asked for the elevation of the building. Mr. Druger stated the eave was at nine feet 21 which should be high enough to remove the temptation of climbing on the roof from vandals. 22 Zurbey asked if the copula would look appropriate on the 20 foot by 20 foot concession stand. 23 Mr. Druger stated it could be placed on the concession stand as is, or altered and used only for 24 ventilation. 25 Koehntop indicated he would like the pavilion and concession stand to remain a more recessed 26 part of the park and not have the Commission make a bold statement with the structures. 27 Mr. Hartman thanked Mr. Druger for the presentation and indicated the Park Commission would 28 now be forming several subcommittees to greater define the uses within each structure. Jindra 29 concurred. 30 Jindra indicated the Commission would be forming a subcommittee for purposes of discussing 31 the ball fields, landscaping plan and the pavilion/concession stand design. A.