My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PK PACKET 11132000
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Parks and Environmental Commission Packets
>
2000
>
PK PACKET 11132000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2019 9:05:46 AM
Creation date
8/7/2019 9:05:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes <br />September 11, 2000 <br />Page 3 <br />1 Jindra noted to Mr. Kost that the VillageFest celebration is typically held on the blacktop parking <br />2 lot, and spills over into the green area of Central Park. She inquired if Central Park would be <br />3 available at all for VillageFest next year. Mr. Kost noted that Central Park would be closed dur- <br />4 ing that time, but it could be possible for the project to work around a celebration in the parking <br />5 lot. It might be a necessity to relocate the VillageFest celebration for the year 2001, but that is - <br />6 sue would be revisited as the Park's plans are finalized. <br />7 Discussion ensued about the grading that is planned for the Park and the drainage issues once the <br />8 grading is completed. Mr. Kost felt confident that the grading plan he has in mind will be less <br />9 expensive than hauling away the extra dirt, and will in actuality benefit the portions of the Park <br />10 that are not currently draining well. <br />11 Mr. Hartman distributed to the Commissioners the most recent list of construction costs which <br />12 was dated July 12, 2000. However, the aggressive skate park cost was still listed on those fig - <br />13 ures, and Mr. Hartman asked Augie Wong to revise the list of July 12 to delete the skate park and <br />14 any associated lighting. Mr. Wong stated that he would revise the list to accurately reflect all <br />15 costs. <br />6 Mr. Kost reviewed for the Commission possibilities for surfacing of the playground area. Mr. <br />17 Kost suggested that a lighter surface, such as brown, tan or yellow is used because of the heat <br />18 that is generated by a darker surface. Additionally, he suggested that more trees be planted in <br />19 that area to assist in alleviating the heat that could be absorbed by the play surface. <br />20 Gebhardt said that she would consider eliminating the play area of the Park because of the <br />21 significant cost of the equipment. Brian Thuesen noted that the area would be used and the <br />22 question would have to be asked if the play equipment would be an important feature of the Park, <br />23 particularly for use in conjunction with the wading pool. <br />24 Gebhardt stated that she felt the pool area and shelter needed to be re -done, but she was unsure <br />25 about the play area. Mr. Kost pointed out that the play area has been in the plans for several <br />26 years and it would be advisable to contact the neighbors in the area of the play equipment and <br />27 find out their feelings before considering eliminating any play areas. <br />28 Jindra noted that she has heard from many residents that they are excited about the play areas. <br />29 Hartman stated that he remembered the Commission had planned on presenting the entire plan all <br />30 at once, and if phasing needed to be implemented, then the Commission could have a back up <br />31 plan in that respect. Mr. Kost noted that at that time, the Commission would need to come to an <br />32 agreement about a backup plan. <br />33 Mr. Kost suggested to the Commission to ask the Council what the limit is for the Park budget, <br />34 and then, if need be, to return and come up with a different phasing plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.