My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PK PACKET 10252001
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Parks and Environmental Commission Packets
>
2001
>
PK PACKET 10252001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2019 9:22:21 AM
Creation date
8/7/2019 9:22:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes <br />October 10, 2001 <br />Page 5 <br />1 Chair Jindra asked what Hubmer recommended. Hubmer recommended a one and a half percent <br />2 slope without drain tile. <br />3 Commissioner Wagner clarified that drain tiles were not a part of the specifics right now. <br />4 Jensen stated he thought that they should stick with the design the way that it is today. <br />5 Hubmer indicated that they could install drain tile in the trails and, if eventually necessary, they could be <br />6 installed in the fields with reasonable ease. <br />7 Wong indicated that they would need at least 1500 feet of drain tile for the entire trail, which would <br />s cost about $60,000. <br />9 Hubmer stated that the Commission could determine a price that they were willing to spend on the drain <br />10 tile for the trail, then see what a contractor comes up with for a bid. <br />1 t Zurbey asked who would be at fault if the field were soggy after rain. Anderson indicated that <br />12 extremely heavy rains are going to produce soggy fields. He added that if an inspector gets the base <br />13 graded properly, they unlikely would have a problem. <br />14 Chair Jindra re -asked who was responsible for soggy fields after $2,300,000 was spent on the project. <br />15 She received the same answer that did not determine blame, but, instead, importance that the inspector <br />16 does his job well. <br />17 Anderson indicated that a one and a half percent grade should be sufficient. <br />18 Jenson indicated that the suggestion from the contractor to add drain tile was a way to up -sell them <br />19 unnecessarily. <br />20 Commissioner Gebhardt stated that she felt that they have gone to the City Council too many times <br />21 asking for money, and that they should not go back when the project is finished and ask for money for <br />22 drain tile. She added that they either needed to determine that the drain tile was necessary now, and <br />23 come up with the money, or have the confidence that the grading will be done properly. . <br />24 Hartman indicated that they could not go back to the City Council for more money. <br />25 Chair Jindra asked Commissioner Gebhardt if she thought that they needed to find a way to pay for the <br />26 drain tile now. Commissioner Gebhardt indicated she was concerned about the issue arising and that <br />27 they needed to get it right the first time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.