Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br />Fence Project & Field Improvements – Wilshire Park & Emerald Park <br />August 2019 <br /> <br />Background: <br />Recent errant batted (and thrown) balls on the Mixed-Use (Baseball & Softball) Fields at Wilshire Park <br />and Emerald Park have led to a revived push to make some field improvements for the enhancement of <br />Player & Spectator Safety, infield integrity & field access (at Wilshire Park), and neighbor-relations <br />(Emerald Park). <br />Comments in the below narrative are the consensus of Field Visits by Boosters Softball (SABSA) <br />President Al Bates, Boosters Softball President Joe Wax, and Boosters Baseball/Softball Fields <br />Coordinator Steve Munson, on August 5, 2019. <br />Inherent in some of the comments regarding ‘Spectator Safety’ are elements of our discussions <br />regarding the makeup of the ‘Spectators’ – which includes siblings younger than the (generally) 10U <br />Players, including toddlers & infants, and non-attentive parents and grandparents. <br />Readers may note that not all items listed below have been in all previous communications to all <br />interested parties, but the field visit afforded an opportunity to bring (almost) all items of interest <br />together in one document. An exception is a potential future enhancement to run electricity to the <br />field(s), to provide for electric pitching machine use during practices -- that has been left for a future <br />discussion. <br />The below desired field improvements are presented in sections, segregated here for presentation into: <br /> (A) Initial items (as initiated by SABSA), <br /> (B) Additional items – Potentially Synergistic (which surfaced in recent discussions, and are <br />likely to prove synergistic to pursue at the same time as the initial items), <br />(C) Additional items - Potentially Different Solutions (resulting from discussions and the field <br />visits, but are perhaps less likely to be addressed by the same materials and/or vendor), <br />(D) Additional items – Unrelated Solutions (resulting from the field visits, and appearing most <br />likely to be able to be addressed independently of the other items). <br /> <br />This sectional segregation has been provided to enable prioritization (if necessary), segmentation into <br />solutions which could be implemented independently of each other (if necessary or desirable), and <br />potentially avoid “scope creep” which could delay implementation of any segment which could be <br />pursued independently of the other segments. <br /> <br /> <br />