My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 10152019
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2019
>
PL PACKET 10152019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2019 3:47:29 PM
Creation date
10/9/2019 4:04:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />As noted below, the Commission’s consensus was to allow an encroachment into the typical 5 <br />foot setback with a 3 foot wide walkway, and a minimum setback requirement of 1 foot. We <br />have cited some of the existing code language for reference, and highlighted the proposed <br />language in redline. <br /> <br />Sidewalks, Walkways, and Patios. <br />As the Planning Commission has observed, and as discussed as part of a Council <br />application issue recently, this item is rooted in lack of definition in the current Zoning <br />Ordinance related to private property improvements that can be confused with other <br />improvements that are both defined and regulated. Specifically, the zoning ordinance <br />defines “Patios” as: <br />PATIO. A courtyard or other finished exterior ground surface open to the sky <br />constructed of rock, brick, concrete, stone, or similar materials and commonly <br />used for relaxation, socializing, or dining. <br />Patios are included in a list of private improvements that are required to meet a <br />minimum 5 foot setback from side and rear property lines. <br />Sidewalks or walkways are not defined, nor are they required to meet any particular <br />setback. As issue in the previous planning application was whether a paved concrete <br />pad was a walkway or a patio. Staff proposed an interpretation for the purposes of <br />dealing with the application in hand, but as noted by the Commission, the City would be <br />well served with better definitions and more complete standards. <br />Since the preparation of the original report materials, an issue has been raised related <br />to the language of the “Sidewalk” definition in its references to “pedestrians” and “non- <br />motorized wheeled traffic”. The comment voiced concern as to whether the definition <br />would create a potential problem for “pedestrians” who rely on adaptive wheeled <br />vehicles for mobility, such as wheelchairs or scooters, whether motorized or non- <br />motorized. <br />To address this concern, staff has updated the previous version of the definition to <br />specify that such vehicles, when used by persons with limited mobility, shall be <br />considered to be included in the term “pedestrian” for purposes of the code. The <br />additional text is italicized below to distinguish it from the original version. <br />For reference, under statutory definitions (Mn Stat Section 169.011), the following <br />definitions relate to this issue in public areas: <br />Subd. 53. Pedestrian. “Pedestrian” means any person afoot or in a wheelchair. <br /> <br />Subd. 93. Wheelchair. For the purposes of this chapter, "wheelchair" is defined to <br />include any manual or motorized wheelchair, scooter, tricycle, or similar device used <br />by a disabled person as a substitute for walking. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.