My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 02182020
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2020
>
PL PACKET 02182020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2020 8:30:21 AM
Creation date
2/13/2020 12:56:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418-1699 <br />Office: (612) 782-3301 • Fax: (612) 782-3302 • www.savmn.com <br /> <br />Our Mission is to be a progressive and welcoming Village that is walkable, sustainable and safe. <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />TO: St. Anthony Planning Commission <br /> Mark Casey, City Manager <br /> <br />FROM: Stephen Grittman, City Planner <br /> <br />DATE: February 12, 2020 <br /> <br />RE: St. Anthony Village – PC Work Session – February 18, 2020 <br /> Temporary Sign Regulations <br /> <br />NAC FILE: 323.01 <br /> <br /> <br />This memorandum is intended to serve as the basis for reviewing and discussing the <br />City’s sign regulations, particularly those related to temporary and real estate sign <br />displays. The City received a complaint over temporary sign displays at the Urban Grove <br />property. Under current sign regulations, the City has no provision for Temporary signs, <br />although several properties around the community have various displays (some of which <br />are commercial in nature, and some of which are specifically related to real estate s ales <br />or leasing). <br /> <br />The Planning Commission will discuss the material at a work session format during the <br />regular meeting on February 18th. The meeting begins at 7:00pm. <br /> <br />Just to be clear, this discussion will not focus on political campaign signs or non- <br />commercial speech displays. Those aspects of sign communication are addressed <br />separately, with specific provisions for campaign signs emanating from State Statute. <br /> <br />Instead, the intent of this discussion is to determine if the City should consider adopting <br />specific regulations relating to temporary signage, and if so, what types of regulations <br />would be in keeping with the community’s overall character and expectations. It is noted <br />that the City’s general approach to signage displays has been to be more limiting in <br />scope that other communities. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.