My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 04282020
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020
>
CC PACKET 04282020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2020 4:20:39 PM
Creation date
4/23/2020 4:20:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />April 14, 2020 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />State Shelter in Place order how are precautions being taken with COVID-19 and having more 1 <br />traffic and workers on the street during this pandemic. Mr. Messner explained earlier this year 2 <br />City Staff sat down and looked at this project in particular because this is the first time the City 3 <br />broke away from the traditional City style street where there are uniform size lots and more of a 4 <br />grid style pattern seen in Minneapolis. The majority of the lots were relatively the same size. 5 <br />With this improvement, particularly on 32nd and Croft Drive, single family homes that had very 6 <br />extreme assessments because of their front footage, particularly the corner lots. Those lots were 7 <br />paying quite a bit more then the small interior lots. All the homes have the same use of the streets 8 <br />and utilities so staff felt those larger lots should not be penalized and have to pay more. Many 9 <br />Municipalities throughout Minnesota actually use this per unit method and is the preferred 10 <br />method with staff actually goes through and looks at a cost benefit appraisal for a home. Staff did 11 <br />actually compare that to pervious assessments that were ran that looked at the front foot method 12 <br />and that method was relatively consistent with the majority of the homes on the property. 13 <br />Regarding the comment on such a large cost increase, that he was not actually sure about what 14 <br />was presented to Ms. Noyes. The only costs presented to the homeowners was at the March 11, 15 <br />2020 meeting and that was the third public information meeting. Prior to that meeting staff did 16 <br />not have any costs on the project because the project had not been bid yet. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Ms. Noyes indicated at the first or second information meeting a range of six to seven thousand 19 <br />dollars was given and she wondered what the greatest cost per unit staff had up until this year. 20 <br />Mr. Messner indicated he was unsure and would have to research that, but it is not abnormal to 21 <br />have costs in the twelve to thirteen-thousand-dollar range for residential assessments. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Mr. Casey explained the reason for not extending payment in full a year out is the City needs to 24 <br />certify this assessment due to bonding in 2020 because that would make the first payment due in 25 <br />2021 which would be paid by the City and the residents in 2022 through the fifteen years the 26 <br />resident would have on the assessment. The fact that the debt has to be certified to the County in 27 <br />2020, therefore anyone who wishes to pay that off would have to be done in 2020. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Mayor Stille asked what staff has been hearing about COVID-19 and street projects and 30 <br />reactions by contractors so far. Mr. Messner explained contractors, in particular, have indicated 31 <br />this is actually a good environment to do this because the workers are outside and do practice 32 <br />social distancing while doing this type of work. Many of the workers are in their own vehicles or 33 <br />machinery by themselves doing the work. If there are meetings onsite the workers will be 34 <br />practicing social distancing of maintaining six-foot distance as well as with homeowners. From 35 <br />the engineers and staff’s standpoint there will be PPE used at all times. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Ms. Sara Atwood, 4024 Silver Lake Terrace, asked when residents are not able to access their 38 <br />driveways where are they going to be parking as well as how will the families with electric 39 <br />vehicles going to charge them because hookups are inside the garages, as well as, her residence 40 <br />will be affected by the wall that will be put in place and she wondered what the cost of the wall 41 <br />and fence that will be put up be. Mr. Messner explained parking for residents on Silver Lake 42 <br />Terrace will be provide on Silver Lane. The City will mark a portion of the street as parking 43 <br />eligible and the Police Department will make sure people can park in those places. Some 44 <br />additional construction barrels will be put up on Silver Lane to provide limits of where folks can 45 <br />park. With regard to electric vehicles staff has worked with those individuals that they are aware 46 <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.