Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />July 14, 2020 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Mayor Stille closed the public input. He asked the City Council for discussion or a motion to 2 <br />approve or deny the request. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Councilmember Randle applauded the work that Semhar Solomon has been doing but he did not 5 <br />agree with the mural. He has heard many people say that this will bring the community closer 6 <br />together, but he did not think so. He thought it would divide the community. He has heard the 7 <br />residents and people who have spoken at the meeting but he also represents St. Anthony as a 8 <br />whole and he has heard from a lot of other residents who have chosen not to speak in public, 9 <br />probably for the same reason that the gentleman spoke of, afraid of repercussions or being 10 <br />bashed or whatever on social media. He indicated he is not on social media, so he did not know 11 <br />the extent of it, only about what people hear. He did not believe it would bring them together. 12 <br />He is open for some type of compromise and was willing to work with the community to do 13 <br />something as a community as a whole. He did not believe this is the way to do it and once the 14 <br />door is opened there will be unattended consequences behind it and there will be requests for 15 <br />other murals and where will the line be drawn so he will not be in favor of the mural and he is 16 <br />also not pleased about the location of it. He did not think anyone in that Police Department need 17 <br />reminding what happened four years ago. The Police Department has made major strides since 18 <br />then. We are quick to pounce on them when something is wrong, but we never give them their 19 <br />due diligence for protecting us and making the changes they have made. He stated he just does 20 <br />not reach out and talk to white people, he also reaches out and talks to people of color to get their 21 <br />opinions on this. Other people need to be able to have open dialogue and open discussion 22 <br />without feeling like they are under attack. He was open for suggestions and discussion in the 23 <br />future. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Councilmember Walker thought it was good there was diversity on the Council, and he would 26 <br />say he would have to disagree to previous comments. They should not get lost in rhetoric. There 27 <br />is a term called confirmation bias where the evidence you look for is confirming what you 28 <br />already want to believe is the case. There is a lot of rhetoric out there. The comment regarding 29 <br />Black Lives Matter is divisive and is dangerous, that is more rhetoric than substance. When 30 <br />someone says they do not like the term, that offends him because he is black, and his life does 31 <br />matter. It is a matter of logic and it puzzles him that people do not see the importance of the 32 <br />distinction made. He was puzzled why people will say All Lives Matter but refuse to say Black 33 <br />Lives Matter, it is a matter of pure logic. He indicated they can get together and have meals 34 <br />together, but it should not be reactionary, it should be just a given and should not be the result of 35 <br />having someone be shot by a Police Officer or a matter or racism. He stated there are Black 36 <br />Lives Matter individuals who are in the movement, he is not in the movement but definitely 37 <br />stand for the statement and is definitely open to interaction. He explained some believe that 38 <br />mural would be divisive and cause division, who is causing the division, those who are the 39 <br />creators of the mural or those who are opposing the mural. Restricting smokers from public 40 <br />buildings was divisive, wearing seatbelts was divisive. The Civil Rights Movement was often 41 <br />called divisive and the leaders were called agitators. He was puzzled that when a mural is being 42 <br />proposed that same rhetoric is being used again. On a grand scale, so was slavery divisive and it 43 <br />split the Union. No one fighting for justice would suggest that addressing slavery should be 44 <br />forbidden or not discussed because it divides the Union. It goes without saying that pretty much 45 <br />any call to justice will leave those not interested in justice to oppose it, thus causing division. 46 <br />10