Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />July 14, 2020 <br />Page 10 <br />2 Mayor Stille closed the public input. He asked the City Council for discussion or a motion to <br />approve or deny the request. <br />4 <br />5 Councilmember Randle applauded the work that Semhar Solomon has been doing but he did not <br />6 agree with the mural. He has heard many people say that this will bring the community closer <br />7 together, but he did not think so. He thought it would divide the community. He has heard the <br />8 residents and people who have spoken at the meeting but he also represents St. Anthony as a <br />9 whole and he has heard from a lot of other residents who have chosen not to speak in public, <br />10 probably for the same reason that the gentleman spoke of, afraid of repercussions or being <br />11 bashed or whatever on social media. He indicated he is not on social media, so he did not know <br />12 the extent of it, only about what people hear. He did not believe it would bring them together. <br />13 He is open for some type of compromise and was willing to work with the community to do <br />14 something as a community as a whole. He did not believe this is the way to do it and once the <br />15 door is opened there will be unattended consequences behind it and there will be requests for <br />16 other murals and where will the line be drawn so he will not be in favor of the mural and he is <br />17 also not pleased about the location of it. He did not think anyone in that Police Department need <br />18 reminding what happened four years ago. The Police Department has made major strides since <br />19 then. We are quick to pounce on them when something is wrong, but we never give them their <br />20 due diligence for protecting us and making the changes they have made. He stated he just does <br />21 not reach out and talk to white people, he also reaches out and talks to people of color to get their <br />22 opinions on this. Other people need to be able to have open dialogue and open discussion <br />23 without feeling like they are under attack. He was open for suggestions and discussion in the <br />24 future. <br />25 <br />26 Councilmember Walker thought it was good there was diversity on the Council, and he would <br />27 say he would have to disagree to previous comments. They should not get lost in rhetoric. There <br />28 is a term called confirmation bias where the evidence you look for is confirming what you <br />29 already want to believe is the case. There is a lot of rhetoric out there. The comment regarding <br />30 Black Lives Matter is divisive and is dangerous, that is more rhetoric than substance. When <br />31 someone says they do not like the term, that offends him because he is black, and his life does <br />32 matter. It is a matter of logic and it puzzles him that people do not see the importance of the <br />33 distinction made. He was puzzled why people will say All Lives Matter but refuse to say Black <br />34 Lives Matter, it is a matter of pure logic. He indicated they can get together and have meals <br />35 together, but it should not be reactionary, it should be just a given and should not be the result of <br />36 having someone be shot by a Police Officer or a matter or racism. He stated there are Black <br />37 Lives Matter individuals who are in the movement, he is not in the movement but definitely <br />38 stand for the statement and is definitely open to interaction. He explained some believe that <br />39 mural would be divisive and cause division, who is causing the division, those who are the <br />40 creators of the mural or those who are opposing the mural. Restricting smokers from public <br />41 buildings was divisive, wearing seatbelts was divisive. The Civil Rights Movement was often <br />42 called divisive and the leaders were called agitators. He was puzzled that when a mural is being <br />43 proposed that same rhetoric is being used again. On a grand scale, so was slavery divisive and it <br />44 split the Union. No one fighting for justice would suggest that addressing slavery should be <br />45 forbidden or not discussed because it divides the Union. It goes without saying that pretty much <br />46 any call to justice will leave those not interested in justice to oppose it, thus causing division. <br />