Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />August 25, 2020 <br />Page 2 <br />1 <br />2 A. 2021 Budget Presentation <br />3 <br />4 Finance Directior Shelly Rueckert presented the 2021 Budget to the City Council. <br />5 <br />6 Councilmember Walker indicated New Brighton discontinued their relationship with St. <br />7 Anthony for refueling their vehicles due to them upgrading their Public Works facility, so he <br />8 wondered how that relationship is established since they are no longer depending on St. Anthony <br />9 for that. He asked if New Brighton originally contacted St. Anthony for that or did St. Anthony <br />10 reach out to them and if so, are there nearby municipalities that could take their spot that have <br />11 been vacated. Ms. Rueckert thought that was on New Brighton's radar for awhile when they <br />12 expanded their maintenance facility. As far as attracting others, the contracting the City gets for <br />13 purchasing lets the City save the eighteen cents Federal tax. The reason why it made sense for <br />14 New Brighton to have that onsite is because they cannot save that eighteen cents a gallon by <br />15 driving a vehicle back and forth for fueling. More time and labor is lost by bringing New <br />16 Brighton vehicles to St. Anthony then gaining in gas savings. City Manager Casey indicated <br />17 New Brighton felt they were getting a good savings by coming to St. Anthony and he was <br />18 surprised this was not done sooner. <br />19 <br />20 Councilmember Webster thanked Ms. Rueckert for the presentation, and she thought it was very <br />21 clear. She noted as a reminder to the residents, the profits from the City's municipal liquor <br />22 stores come back to essentially lower the City's property tax levy. Ms. Rueckert indicated that <br />23 was correct. <br />24 <br />25 B. Ordinance 2020-02 Amending Chapter 91 Animal Control <br />26 <br />27 City Manager Casey reviewed the ordinance with the Council and indicated that this is the <br />28 second of three readings. <br />29 <br />30 Councilmember Walker asked for an example of a proper enclosure because there is some <br />31 objective standard of what it looks like. He assumed the size would vary based on the dog. Mr. <br />32 Casey indicated the City does not have any plans for a proper enclosure but would be able to <br />33 provide some guidance. The Statute did define it as "A securely confined indoors or securely <br />34 enclosed and locked pen or structure. Suitable to prevent an animal from escaping and providing <br />35 protection from the elements of the dog. A proper enclosure does not include a porch, patio or <br />36 any part of the house, garage or other structure that would allow a dog to exit on its own volition <br />37 or any house or structure in which windows are open or in which a door or window screens are <br />38 the only obstacle that prevents a dog from exiting." He thought there was some interpretation in <br />39 the Statute and the Chief of Police of designee would come in and check the property. <br />40 <br />41 Ms. Renee Reed thanked Mr. Casey for answering her questions regarding the proper enclosure <br />42 and who is going to determine the proper enclosure. She indicated she read the information and <br />43 wondered in regard to the signs, how many signs did there need to be and what size of the sign <br />44 would need to be posted on the fence. She also indicated their mail carrier has informed a <br />45 number of the residents on the street that if the dog is out when the mail carrier is coming to the <br />46 street, the mail carrier will not deliver mail that day on their street or will try to come back after <br />