My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 01262021
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2021
>
CC PACKET 01262021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2021 6:06:51 PM
Creation date
1/21/2021 4:43:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Noise Pollution. Where is the analysis of the decibel levels when the <br />proposed carwash is working at full capacity? Specifically, cars idling, all <br />vacuums being used, and the noise of the dryers from the carwash itself. <br />We can only assume there will be car stereo noise. Are the plans <br />compliant with existing city noise ordinances? The planning staff’s duty <br />is to ensure that these noise elements have been studied and submitted <br />and are compliant. (F) <br /> <br />The neighborhood is quiet. (G) This is one of the reasons people enjoy <br />living in this area. We like to walk our dogs and visit with our neighbors. <br />It is impossible to fully capture the negative impact of this project on the <br />overall quality of life and desirability of being a homeowner, a condo <br />owner, an apartment dweller in this neighborhood. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />WATER CONSUMPTION <br />There are millions and millions of dollars in upcoming proposed housing <br />projects that will all need water. At the time of the first iteration of the <br />Lowry-Grove project there was concern that there may need to be added <br />infrastructure to accommodate the water needs of that project. While <br />that project went away, new projects are coming. The projects on this <br />end of the city, Kenzie Terrace and Stinson Parkway development, <br />Development 65, and Trident Redevelopment Bremer site are under <br />consideration for approval. Where is the analysis of water usage for the <br />BLVD Carwash and the expected needs of the area as there is further <br />development been considered? (H) How will this affect R-1 occupancies <br />water volume? Will there be adequate volume for fire suppression? <br />What is the big picture in terms of water needs to the community? <br /> <br />We are a top tier Green City. There are systems for car wash facilities <br />that are Green compliant. As there are few specifics throughout the <br />proposal being brought forth by the Planning Commission, the Council <br />cannot determine if this is a Green compliant project. (I) In fact, it is <br />possible to wash a car with less than 15 gallons of water then recapture <br />and reuse almost 100% of that water. (See Denver, CO – Gleam carwash) <br /> <br />All of the Health/Safety/General Welfare questions are about the impact <br />of the proposed carwash on the health of the neighborhood’s residents. <br />(J) As a Green City it would seems we can do better to protect our <br />citizenry by being diligent and following the law before bringing this <br />submission to the Council. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />NOTE F: Noise is addressed in City’s <br />nuisance code, and this is an ongoing <br />operational condition. Applicant has <br />designed facilities to face exit garage <br />to east, oriented away from <br />Kenzington, approximately 170 feet <br />from that building and 200 feet from <br />single family to the north. Moreover, <br />planning staff has recommended that <br />additional screening, including <br />permanent covered structures be <br />added to mitigate potential noise <br />impacts. <br /> <br />NOTE G: This property is located <br />along a major 4-lane County Road <br />adjacent to, and across from, <br />Commercial development areas. <br /> <br />NOTE H: There is no indication from <br />City Engineering or Public Works staff <br />that there is any reason to be <br />concerned about water quantities or <br />consumption. Moreover, the Comp <br />Plan has identified the various existing <br />and future uses in the area (high <br />density residential and commercial), <br />and utility planning would have <br />identified if there was any water <br />supply issues that would require <br />study prior to approval of any <br />particular use. <br /> <br />NOTE I: The City encourages these <br />policies – the City does not (currently) <br />have regulations that require them. If <br />the City wants to require them, it <br />would have to enact amendments to <br />its codes to do so. <br /> <br />NOTE J: The standards refer to the <br />“vicinity”, the “area”, and the <br />“district” in which the proposed CUP <br />is located, as well as to the “public <br />convenience” and the “general <br />welfare”. Neighbor location and <br />impact is important, but not the only <br />factor. <br /> <br /> <br />106
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.