My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 01262021
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2021
>
CC MINUTES 01262021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2021 3:36:25 PM
Creation date
2/11/2021 3:36:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />January 26, 2021 <br />Page 10 <br />1 planning and zoning customarily are governed by the principle to avoid conflicts of use. Here <br />2 there is about as intense commercial use as could be imagined. A high velocity car wash with <br />3 high vehicle traffic counts immediately contiguous to a multi -family residential condominium <br />4 building and a single-family neighborhood. He stated with all respect to Planner Grittman, it is <br />5 not the burden of the City to establish the compliance with the finding, it is the burden of the <br />6 applicant. The statement by Mr. Grittman that it is very difficult to deny a Conditional Use <br />7 Permit completely flies in the face of Minnesota Land Use Law. The decision of the City <br />8 Council must be based on the facts in the record and the facts are measured against the required <br />9 findings in the City Code. There has been ample testimony from residents contiguous to the <br />10 property regarding adverse noise impacts. There has been testimony regarding air quality <br />11 impacts and concerns, there are concerns with regard to light pollution and impacts directly on <br />12 nearby residents. There are multiple statements of adverse impacts on nearby residential <br />13 property values. A property owner is competent to testify as to impacts to their own property. <br />14 There are also the opinions of real estate professionals and most notably a real estate professional <br />15 that has represented hundreds of clients within the Kenzington Condominium community. <br />16 Given the intensity of the car wash impacts, of vehicle trips, noise and air pollution, and safety <br />17 concerns, this use is simply incompatible with the existing surrounding neighborhood residential <br />18 uses. He stated there are many compatible uses that this property can be reasonably put to <br />19 without imposing the conflicts of land use and can satisfy the requirements of the Conditional <br />20 Use Permit. He respectfully requests, based on the facts and the record and the City's Code that <br />21 the Conditional Use Permit must be denied. <br />22 <br />23 Mr. Casey Scott, 2501 Paul Avenue, St. Anthony, explained he has known Tom Archambault <br />24 and his family for many years, and they have been great neighbors. This particular decision to <br />25 put a car wash so close to the neighbors on 27`x' seems to be very much in contrary to past <br />26 decisions that he and the prior owner have made. He found it kind of strange that the owner <br />27 talked about running the operation from 8am to 5pm and then the City expanded that from lam <br />28 to I Opm., especially when this is right near so many houses and residential areas. He thought the <br />29 hours of operation should be explored, especially on the weekend. Right now, Mr. <br />30 Archambault's business does not operate on the weekend so he wondered if there was a need to <br />31 have this business operate on a weekend. The big difference he sees between the other car <br />32 washes mentioned during this meeting and this car wash is that this one is extremely close in <br />33 proximity to the residential neighbors. He appreciated that City staff recommended there be a <br />34 number of changes to try to mitigate some of this impact, but he also noticed that there has been <br />35 nothing done to measure the current noise, air pollution, current water runoff, etc. so that there <br />36 can be some comparisons to other car washes in the neighborhood that were mentioned to see <br />37 what the difference would be. He thought there are some of those steps that Mr. Keane <br />38 mentioned and others that should be taken before a decision is made. He would recommend that <br />39 at a minimum the decision should be tabled until further study is done to be able to understand <br />40 the impact on the residents in the community. <br />41 <br />42 Mr. Scott asked how big the trees will be because if small trees are planted those trees will not be <br />43 able to mitigate for several years. If large trees are planted there is a risk of them dying in a few <br />44 years and whose responsibility will it be to replant the trees. He thought there were some <br />45 specific details that needed to be worked out about all of these mitigation steps to make sure that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.