My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 07202021
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2021
>
PL PACKET 07202021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2021 3:51:56 PM
Creation date
7/14/2021 3:51:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Included in the packet is a copy of the current regulations in place, as well as an <br />updated table-form document that lists the series of potential amendments to the <br />district. As part of the table-from document, comments are provided for each proposed <br />change discussing the rationale behind the new language. The revisions from the work <br />session are highlighted for additional clarity <br /> <br />The current district language was established many years ago, and reflects a more <br />moderate density, suburban style of multi-family development. Just in the past few <br />years, the City has considered multi-family projects on four different sites (one of which <br />did not proceed). Each of those were required to utilize the PUD zoning process due to <br />a series of modifications the projects required from typical R-4 regulations, including <br />density, setbacks, parking calculations, height, and other factors. <br /> <br />The current R-4 District restricts density to anywhere from about 13 units per acre up to <br />24 units per acre, depending on the size of the building. Over the past two years, the <br />City considered, and adopted, an updated Comprehensive Plan that directs <br />development in high density zoning districts to between 20 and 40 units per acre. <br /> <br />While PUD is still a viable path for projects that exceed density or other aspects of the <br />R-4 standards, it can be difficult to process when the individual aspects of the project <br />are of borderline quality or push the envelope in some way. Without baseline standards <br />that reflect a reasonable expectation for development in the district, everything is left to <br />negotiation, which can put the City in a difficult position. <br /> <br />The revisions to the district are intended to create a threshold for higher density projects <br />that set an expectation for development. Beyond this, the threshold for PUD <br />consideration would also then be higher, as this becomes the new baseline. <br /> <br />Recommended Action. <br /> <br />Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed amendments, with any additional <br />changes discussed at the public hearing. As noted, these changes will make multi- <br />family development more straightforward in those areas where it is proposed, set <br />specific minimum expectations for such development, and bring the zoning ordinance <br />more closely into conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission’s advisory action will then be forwarded to the City Council <br />for its final action at an upcoming meeting.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.