Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />September 14, 2021 <br />Page 6 <br />1 1. The applicant participates in a subdivision of the portion of 26544 Kenzie that encroaches <br />2 into the alley and the City retains ownership of that remnant. <br />3 2. Access -related issues shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City <br />4 Engineer, as well as Hennepin County and Minneapolis Park Board. <br />5 3. The proposed bank site plan is modified to increase drive -through lane stacking space. <br />6 4. The applicants modify the landscaping plan for the bank location to retain a portion of the <br />7 existing evergreen plantings. <br />8 5. The proposed monument sign on the bank site is placed and designed to meet city <br />9 ordinances for size and setback. If an electronic display is desired, the applicants will <br />10 need to apply for a separate Conditional Use Permit under the applicable code. <br />11 6. The lighting plan for the proposed bank site is modified to show a zero footcandle light <br />12 intensity at the boundary with the senior residential property to the west. <br />13 7. The applicant adds foundation plantings along the Stinson and Kenzie frontages of the <br />14 residential building. <br />15 8. The City finds that the proposed parking supply is adequate to serve the residential <br />16 facility. <br />17 9. Final PUD Plans demonstrate compliance with ADA parking supply requirements (for <br />18 disabled persons). <br />19 10. As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a final signage plan be submitted for review <br />20 which demonstrates compliance with City requirements. <br />21 11. Issues related to grading, drainage, and utilities shall be subject to comment and <br />22 recommendation by the City Engineer. <br />23 12. The applicant enter into a PUD agreement with the City and post all the necessary <br />24 securities required by it. <br />25 13. The applicant executes the required land transfers suitable to the City Council. <br />26 14. Consideration of comments of other City Staff. <br />27 <br />28 This recommendation is based on a finding that the proposal, with the conditions cited, is <br />29 consistent with the requirements for PUD consideration, with the long-term objectives of the <br />30 recommendations and policies of the St. Anthony Comprehensive Plan. <br />31 <br />32 City Planner Grittman (via Zoom) thanked Commissioner Morita for his presentation. Mr. <br />33 Grittman noted the applicant has made a number of updates to their site plans in response to <br />34 Planning Commission concerns. A number of Sustainability issues have been included in their <br />35 proposal. <br />36 <br />37 Mayor Stille asked about the parking. Mr. Grittman stated the amount of parking proposed meets <br />38 the R-4 standards but the issue arises that the applicants propose to charge separately for the <br />39 underground parking. If more than a few opt not to purchase underground parking, there would <br />40 be use of surface parking and may overflow onto the City streets. The issue raised, is in staff's <br />41 opinion the applicants need to provide the underground parking in their rent structure to the <br />42 tenants. Mayor Stille asked how this issue could be addressed. Mr. Grittman stated there will be <br />43 a PUD that imposes whatever approvals Council places on this. Staff recommends that condition <br />44 be included as part of the PUD Agreement. <br />45 <br />