My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WORKSESSION PACKET 11162021- Joint with Planning Commission
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
2021
>
CC WORKSESSION PACKET 11162021- Joint with Planning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2021 4:27:47 PM
Creation date
11/10/2021 4:26:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The density counts are identified for the entire high density designated areas, and are averaged over <br />that designation. The unit styles listed in the table include row-homes, townhouses, garden apartments, <br />and larger apartment buildings. From a density standpoint, apartment projects will fit the 20-40 units <br />per acre range, depending on the floor count. Row homes and townhouses will usually fall below the <br />range, given the land areas dedicated to each unit. The Plan presumes that some individual projects will <br />fall below the range given the allowable unit styles, but that the overall density in the high-density areas <br />will meet the range specified. <br />With that, the City can consider a variety of project types on the property in question. Because the <br />multiple family areas of the Silver Lake Village PUD are largely built out, or being constructed currently, <br />and at densities well above the 20 unit per acre minimum threshold, a project of any size on this one- <br />acre parcel will barely move the overall average density number for the larger district. <br />The City has been approached by a development interest that proposes a small apartment complex on <br />the property, with a total of 38 units – the development group describes it as the same as that which <br />they are currently constructing at 3725 Stinson, one block south of the gas-station site. As the City may <br />recall, that project is a 38 unit structure with surface parking, and is designed to be a low-amenity <br />building with the goal of providing housing to workforce/affordable markets, but without public <br />subsidies. <br />For most land use decisions, factors to account for include transportation and access, surrounding land <br />use compatibility, utility impacts (if any), and Comprehensive Plan policies. The City’s consideration of <br />land uses on this site would appear to be open to a range of housing, given the land use direction (high <br />density residential), and the Comprehensive Plan’s acceptance of a variety of housing styles. Finally, it is <br />also common that development design and quality routinely become a factor in land use decision- <br />making, and these elements may be important in the City’s consideration of any particular proposal. <br />Staff is seeking feedback from City Council and Planning Commission as to any particular direction to <br />lead interested development parties on the project, as well as direction to the current party. While <br />inquiries are often general in nature, the current proposal has a more specific expectation and a current <br />model to evaluate it against. In any case, direction from public officials will benefit both this developer <br />and any others in the preparation of further plans, particularly given the range of options that the <br />Comprehensive Plan makes available to the City. <br />Elements that may have bearing on the City’s response may include the following: <br />• Density and Unit Count <br />• Project Design and Architecture <br />• Building Massing <br />• Market <br />• Affordability <br />• Sustainability Features <br />• Site Amenities, Features, Landscape <br />• Support Features (parking, etc.)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.