Laserfiche WebLink
2. Other alternative expansions of the driveway create additional conflicts with zoning <br />ordinance requirements and land use policy. <br />3. The applicant has shown unique conditions on the property that interfere with putting the <br />property to a reasonable residential use. <br />4. Circumstances that would lead to variance approval are not the result of the actions of the <br />owner; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings of fact in support of the resolution <br />for denial of the patio setback, the accessory shed setback, and the impervious surface coverage: <br />1. The applicant has not shown that the variance requests are necessary to put the property <br />to reasonable use under the applicant zoning regulations. <br />2. The patio setback, shed setback, and impervious surface amounts can be met while <br />putting the property to reasonable use by modifying the improvements that were <br />constructed prior to required permitting. <br />3. There are no unique conditions present on the property that create practical difficulties in <br />putting the property to reasonable use. <br />4. The applicant could retain the prior shed setbacks by retaining non -conformity rights for <br />the prior sized shed, but not with its expansion. <br />NOW THEREFORE MAY IT BE RESOVLED, that the City Council of the <br />City of St. Anthony Village accepts the findings and recommendations documented in the staff <br />report and denies the requested variances to the required setbacks for patio and shed, and for <br />impervious surface, as shown on the application dated 9/30/2021. <br />Passed in regular session of the City Council on the 9th day of November 2021. <br />CITY OF <br />LE <br />ATTEST: <br />City rk <br />�jf <br />Charlie under, City Manager <br />Review for Administration: <br />ANTHONY VILLAGE <br />