CC MINUTES 10262021 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 26, 2021 Page 5 3. The City finds that the proposed parking supply is adequate to serve the residential facility. Staff comment: The City Council approved the parking arrangements proposed by the developer as an aspect of the Preliminary Plan PUD approval. 7 4. Final PUD Plans demonstrate compliance with ADA parking supply requirements (for 8 disabled persons). 9 Staff comment: The applicant has provided adequate accessible parking per state 10 requirements. 11 12 5. As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a fmal signage plan be submitted for review 13 which demonstrates compliance with City requirements. 14 Staff comment: Signage will require final permitting prior to construction. No flexibility 15 from zoning standards is being requested. 16 17 6. Issues related to grading, drainage and utilities shall be subject to comment and 18 recommendation by the City Engineer. 19 Staff comment: The City Engineer will review final construction plans for compliance and 20 adequacy. 21 22 7. The applicant enters into a PUD agreement with the City and post all the necessary 23 securities required by it. 24 Staff comment: This requirement will remain an aspect of the final land transfers and 25 recorded concurrently with the final conditions. 26 27 8. The applicant executes the required land transfers suitable to the City Council. 28 Staff comment: This will occur as a part of final signatures and recording. 29 30 9. Consideration of comments of other City Staff. 31 32 Mr. Grittman stated for the Final Plan PUD Staff recommends approval with the following 33 conditions: 34 1. Final Staff reviews for Engineering, Public Safety, Public Works, and Building Departments. 35 2. Final Approvals from Hennepin County as required 36 3. Subdivision, Easement DedicationsNacations, and Land Transfers as required. 37 4. Execution of Final PUD Agreement and other agreements as necessary. 38 39 This recommendation is based on a finding that the proposal, with final review of construction 40 plans by appropriate staff, will comply with the conditions cited in the Preliminary Plan PUD 41 approval, and is consistent with the long-term objectives of the recommendations and policies of 42 the St. Anthony Comprehensive Plan. 43 44 Councilmember Jenson asked about the conditions for Bremer Bank and asked if all the 45 conditions were agreed to by the developer and Mr. Grittman stated they will be addressed as 46 part of the PUD agreement.