Laserfiche WebLink
November 9, 2020 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />1. Side Yard Setback Variance for Driveway, reducing the required 5 foot setback to 2 feet. <br />Staff and Planning Commission recommend approval, based on a finding that the current <br />garage and driveway are inadequate to provide reasonable access and parking area on the <br />property, and that further expansion to the interior of the lot would create other zoning issues. <br />The Planning Commission made this recommendation with one negative vote. <br />2. Side Yard Setback Variance for Patio, reducing the required 5 foot setback to 2 feet. Staff <br />and Planning Commission recommend denial, based on a finding that the threshold <br />requirements for unique conditions and definition of reasonable use are not met according to <br />the requirements of the zoning ordinance for variance consideration. A portion of the patio <br />should be removed to meet the 5 foot setback. The Planning Commission made this <br />recommendation unanimously. <br />3. Side and Rear Yard Setback Variance for Shed Expansion from 5 feet to 0 feet. Staff and <br />Planning Commission recommend denial, based on a finding that the threshold requirements <br />for unique conditions and definition of reasonable use are not met according to the <br />requirements of the zoning ordinance for variance consideration. The applicant may choose to <br />remove a portion of the shed to retain the prior non-conformity setbacks for a 10’ by 10’ shed, <br />or relocate the expanded shed to meet the 5 foot setback. The Planning Commission made this <br />recommendation unanimously. <br />4. Impervious Surface Variance from 40% maximum coverage to 43% coverage. Staff and <br />Planning Commission recommend denial, based on a finding that the threshold requirements <br />for unique conditions and definition of reasonable use are not met according to the <br />requirements of the zoning ordinance for variance consideration. The applicant should work <br />with Code Enforcement to remove at least 220 square feet of impervious area (this amount <br />based on staff estimates), or provide a survey that demonstrates a different amount of removal <br />to meet the maximum allowable coverage of 40% (3,715 square feet). The Planning <br />Commission made this recommendation unanimously. <br />Because these improvements were completed prior to permitting or zoning approval, denial of <br />the variances noted would require removal of some of the improvements made to the <br />property. <br /> <br />GENERAL INFORMATION <br />Applicant: Greg Stull <br />Owner: Cynthia Stull <br />Location: 2912 Crestview Drive <br />Existing Land Use Low-Density Residential <br /> <br />Zoning: R-1 Single Family District