Laserfiche WebLink
November 9, 2020 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />impervious surfaces on by approximately 220 square feet. A survey would be necessary <br />to be more precise. <br />The City has been rigorous in enforcing the impervious surface standards due to overall <br />stormwater management issues, including specific areas of flooding in the past, and a <br />number of variances have been denied for similar exceptions, or potential applicants <br />cautioned that variances for future projects are unlikely. The ordinance has been <br />structured to allow a slightly higher percentage for lots such as that of the applicant, <br />increasing the standard allowance from 35% to 40% for smaller existing lots, under <br />9,000 square feet. <br />For a lot of 8,732 square feet, a total impervious surface area – including all paved areas <br />within the boundaries of the parcel, as well as roof coverage of both principal and <br />accessory buildings, the maximum allowable impervious area is 3,493 squar e feet. <br />Measurement taken by staff from aerial photography indicate a total current coverage <br />(including the improvements placed by the applicant prior to permitting) of <br />approximately 3,715 square feet. As noted above, the applicant could have a survey <br />prepared to demonstrate a different number. <br />However, under the current estimates, the applicant must remove 220 square feet of <br />impervious area, or receive a variance to accommodate the current higher square <br />footage. Had the applicant applied for the required building and/or zoning permits for <br />the various improvements, staff would have notified him of the impervious standard, <br />and cautioned him of the need to limit construction to the allowable area. <br />In viewing the projects as if they were being proposed prior to construction, there is no <br />apparent unique condition that supports the need for a variance to make reasonable <br />use of the property. For the driveway discussed above, the expanded area adds about <br />210 square feet of coverage. The shed covers 200 square feet, 100 square feet of which <br />is expanded coverage from the original condition. The patio adds approximately 375 <br />square feet of coverage (again, estimating from aerial photography), about 75 square <br />feet of which appears to be in the required setback. <br />Staff recommends against the impervious surface variance, and further recommends <br />that at least 220 square feet of current impervious surface area is removed from the <br />property. As highlighted previously, the applicant may present a survey that accounts <br />for current conditions, and which may modify that total to match the maximum <br />allowable coverage of 3,715 square feet. <br /> <br />2. Representative Codes Referenced. <br />Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section §152.245 VARIANCES. <br /> <br />3. Criteria for and Consistency with Criteria for Variance Approval. Title XV Land Usage, <br />Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section §152.245, (C) Evidence, lists the criteria the City Council <br />must consider in determining whether to grant or deny a variance. <br />Request: Request for a 5-foot variance from the required side yard setback. The applicable <br />criteria include: