Laserfiche WebLink
2.Other alternative expansions of the driveway create additional conflicts with zoning <br />ordinance requirements and land use policy. <br />3.The applicant has shown unique conditions on the property that interfere with putting the <br />property to a reasonable residential use. <br />4.Circumstances that would lead to variance approval are not the result of the actions of the <br />owner; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings of fact in support of the resolution <br />for denial of the patio setback, the accessory shed setback, and the impervious surface coverage: <br />1.The applicant has not shown that the variance requests are necessary to put the property <br />to reasonable use under the applicant zoning regulations. <br />2.The patio setback, shed setback, and impervious surface amounts can be met while <br />putting the property to reasonable use by modifying the improvements that were <br />constructed prior to required permitting. <br />3.There are no unique conditions present on the property that create practical difficulties in <br />putting the property to reasonable use. <br />4.The applicant could retain the prior shed setbacks by retaining non-conformity rights for <br />the prior sized shed, but not with its expansion. <br />NOW THEREFORE MAY IT BE RESOVLED, that the City Council of the <br />City of St. Anthony Village accepts the findings and recommendations documented in the staff <br />report and denies the requested variances to the required setbacks for patio and shed, and for <br />impervious surface, as shown on the application dated 9/30/2021. <br />Passed in regular session of the City Council on the 9th day of November 2021. <br />CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE <br />By:_________________________________ <br />Randy Stille, Mayor <br />ATTEST:_________________________________ <br />City Clerk <br />Review for Administration: _______________________________________ <br />Charlie Yunker, City Manager