My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WS PACKET 02222022
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
2022
>
CC WS PACKET 02222022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2022 2:00:56 PM
Creation date
2/17/2022 2:00:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2/17/22, 1:20 PM Leading in a Crisis: Building High-Performance Teams <br />https://www.govtech.com/analysis/leading-in-a-crisis-building-high-performance-teams.html 6/8 <br />(temporal or other) boundaries for arriving at a decision. <br />Challenge 4: Tunnel vision and mental fatigue <br />High performance can operate on the edge of failure. Adrenaline and stress can <br />enhance the ability of individuals to perform and even thrive, but they can also <br />create a false sense of being able to cope if only we keep pushing ourselves. <br />Separation from friends, loved ones and indeed many colleagues can be necessary <br />in order to function, but prolonged insulation demonstrably leads to alienation and <br />clouded judgment. Well-meaning commitments to the group’s work and its key <br />decisions may escalate and succumb to blinkered thinking that any decisions it has <br />taken must have been the right ones. Particularly, in long-running crises (such as <br />COVID-19), sheer fatigue and "bunker syndrome" can be the enemy of good team <br />performance. <br />Recommendation: <br />First, teams should build in regular and short (20 minutes at a time will do) but <br />purposeful "stop, reflect and reconsider" moments into their proceedings. During <br />such "balcony time," members are encouraged to give voice to what they notice <br />about their own and the team’s mindsets and behaviors, and what might be <br />questioned and improved. Second, all team members should have <br />fallbacks/deputies who regularly attend team meetings. This enables the pacing of <br />each individual’s workload and pre-empts any illusion of irreplaceability and <br />misguided sense of duty to gain hold of team members. Third, efforts should be <br />made to ensure team members do not remain locked in bunkers or on executive <br />floors. Force them to see "real people" (frontline staff, citizens, loved ones) regularly <br />to hear and feel different voices and maintain a sense of perspective. Fourth, <br />periodically bring in a respected outsider (senior peers, independent experts, <br />experienced facilitators) to purposefully challenge the shared beliefs, norms and <br />practices that have developed within the team. Such "critical friend" scrutiny may <br />feel like a luxury when in fact it is a necessity. <br />Eric Stern is Professor and 2019-2020 Faculty Chair at the College of Emergency <br />Preparedness, Homeland Security and Cybersecurity, University at Albany (SUNY). <br />Paul 't Hart is a professor of public administration at the Utrecht University School of <br />Governance and the Netherlands School of Public Administration (NSOB) in The
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.