My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PK PACKET 03072022
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Parks and Environmental Commission Packets
>
2022
>
PK PACKET 03072022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2022 1:40:04 PM
Creation date
3/2/2022 1:39:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks and Environmental Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br />December 20, 2021 <br />Page 4 <br />1 Mr. Yunker indicated that was correct. <br />2 <br />3 Chair Bellinger asked if this would be a revenue producer for the City. <br />4 <br />5 Mr. Yunker indicated it would not. The dynamic in St. Anthony is that Community Services is <br />6 under the School District which handles the facility rentals and collects those fees. Generally <br />7 when cities do fees for utilization of city facilities like that, what the city is doing is just trying <br />8 to recoup staff costs to facilitate that. The fees are not used for upkeep of the Capital <br />9 Improvements. Typically the infrastructure is all funded by tax levy. <br />10 <br />11 Commissioner Niemi asked if there is talk of redoing the boards in the proposal. <br />12 <br />13 Mr. Yunker explained in conversations with Jeremy they did not see, necessarily, there would <br />14 be a need for any work on the boards but if this would move forward there would be more <br />15 details that would be worked out regarding that. <br />16 <br />17 Commissioner Reed asked if the courts would also be open for public use. <br />18 <br />19 Mr. Yunker indicated that was correct. He explained staff is looking for a recommendation <br />20 because this item has been before the Park Commission a number of times and it is getting to <br />21 the point to either move forward or not do this. <br />22 <br />23 Commissioner Reed felt the Commission has received enough information on this topic and <br />24 requests for them and she did see this as a real priority. <br />25 <br />26 Chair Bellinger thought this was a great solution for the demand. <br />27 <br />28 Commissioner Niemi explained he liked the location but parking is still going to be an issue in <br />29 the summertime because there is baseball, softball and soccer there and the parking is always <br />30 full as well as City Hall Parking. He thought this is something to be considered as well. He <br />31 thought the City decided to make dedicated courts at Culver’s Court as well. <br />32 <br />33 Mr. Yunker explained there were concerns about the conditions of the courts, just like at <br />34 Central Park, and that discussion revolved around how far the City would need to take those <br />35 repairs because what the City has is a single tennis court that was put in an open spot without <br />36 really trying to be a destination for an amenity. There are no lights there and no bathrooms <br />37 with minimal parking. Given its condition and the cost to do a full replacement, it does not <br />38 really make sense to try to do that because all they would get is four Pickleball Courts, which <br />39 would not be enough for tournaments and what the club is looking for. <br />40 <br />41 Chair Bellinger thanked Mr. Yunker for the information. <br />42 <br />43 Motion by Commissioner Reed, seconded by Commissioner Guest, to recommend the City <br />44 Council approve the Pickleball Courts as a priority as proposed. <br />45 <br />46 Commissioner Niemi indicated he liked the location but the priority, he was not sure about.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.