My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 03152022
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2022
>
PL PACKET 03152022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2022 10:35:28 AM
Creation date
3/14/2022 10:35:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br />February 15, 2022 <br />Page 2 <br />1 Comprehensive Plan. The parcel (2501 Lowry Avenue NE – Urban Grove) is shown on the <br />2 zoning map provided and the 2040 Future Land Use map, also provided. The property <br />3 consists of approximately 11 acres after the subdivision of the westerly 4+ acres for <br />4 development of a senior housing project. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan describes High <br />5 Density Residential as a land use category that would expect to be developed at densities <br />6 between 20 and 40 units per acre. The Low-Density Residential category is expected to be <br />7 developed at densities between 2 and 4 units per acre. The plan includes a “Medium-Density” <br />8 category with a range from 4 to 20 units per acre. <br />9 <br />10 The applicant seeks a Low-Density designation as being consistent with the long-standing <br />11 zoning of the property as R-1, Single Family Residential. Land Use refers to the general type <br />12 and intensity of use. Zoning is a specific designation that manages the use, and extent of <br />13 developed land. <br />14 <br />15 For Zoning Map amendments (rezoning), the City conducts a public hearing by the Planning <br />16 Commission, after which the zoning amendment is considered by the City Council as an <br />17 ordinance. If approved, it is adopted and the map is amended. <br />18 <br />19 Mr. Grittman stated for Comprehensive Plan amendments, the process is more complex. The <br />20 Planning Commission holds the public hearing, and the City Council then is asked to approve <br />21 the amendment for the purposes of notifying adjoining or affected jurisdictions (neighboring <br />22 cities, watershed districts, school districts, affected state agencies, etc.). The jurisdictions have <br />23 up to 6 months to comment on the proposed amendment. Once comments are received, the <br />24 City decides how to respond to the comments, and then sends the proposed amendment (with <br />25 the comments and responses) to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment. The Met <br />26 Council is responsible for reviewing the document for its consistency with regional plans <br />27 adopted by the Council. The Met Council will review the proposed impacts on several factors, <br />28 including population projections, road and traffic considerations, impacts on regional parks, <br />29 housing (and affordable housing impact), and sanitary sewer impacts – among others. <br />30 <br />31 The process parallels the original adoption of the 2040 plan, which was prepared under the <br />32 requirements of the Met Council as well. For the 2040 plan to be approved, the City was <br />33 required to show how its future land use plan provided adequate land areas for the population <br />34 and housing projections made by Met Council, along with the City’s required allocation of <br />35 affordable housing units, also assigned by Met Council. <br />36 <br />37 At the time the Comprehensive Plan was being prepared, there were no specific <br />38 redevelopment plans for the subject property. The property owner had removed most of the <br />39 buildings in the manufactured home park, but for a few retained homes and a few <br />40 common/maintenance buildings. The City adopted its new land use plan with newly revised <br />41 density allowances (between 20 and 40 units per acre) while at the same time, the property <br />42 owner was preparing the site for redevelopment. Planning staff is unaware of any specific <br />43 redevelopment plans provided to the City in the form of redevelopment or zoning applications <br />44 or site plan requests during this period, and no formal applications were made. <br />45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.